WiFi Emits Microwave Radiation September 2, 2006
Posted by healthyself in 50 Hz, 60 Hz Magnetic Fields, Animal Research, Bioeffects, Biological Effects, Blogroll, Brain, Cell changes, Cell phone industry, Cell phone safety, Cell phone towers, Cell Phones, Cells, Central Nervous System, Children's health, Chromosomal damage, Decision Making, Digital, Electromagnetic pollution, Electromagnetic waves, Electrosensitivity, Electrosmog, ELF, Emergency Medicine, EMF Research, EMF's, Employees, EMR, Environment, Epidemiologists, Funding, Games and Gaming, genes, GHz, grams of tissue, Grants, Hand Portables, Health related, High Frequencies, high voltage transmission lines, Hormones, HOuseholds, Hz, Inflammation, Lethargy, Lifestyle, Long Term Health Risks, Low Frequencies, MCS, Men's Health, MHz, Microwave exposure, miscarriages, mobile telephones, neurological, Noise, Parenting, Penetration, Pineal Gland, Public Policy, Pulsed Radiation, Quantum Physics, radiation, Research, Risk of Disease, Safe Levels, signaling enzymes, Sleep disturbances, Stress, Symptoms, Tumors, Tweenies, VDT, W/Kg, watts, Who is Affected?, WiFi, Women's Health, Workplace.trackback
“The most basic fact about cell phones and cell towers is that they emit microwave radiation; so do Wi-Fi (wireless Internet) antennas, wireless computers, cordless (portable) phones and their base units, and all other wireless devices. If it’s a communication device and it’s not attached to the wall by a wire, it’s emitting radiation. Most Wi-Fi systems and some cordless phones operate at the exact same frequency as a microwave oven, while other devices use a different frequency. Wi-Fi is always on and always radiating. The base units of most cordless phones are always radiating, even when no one is using the phone. A cell phone that is on but not in use is also radiating. And, needless to say, cell towers are always radiating.”
“Why is this a problem, you might ask? Scientists usually divide the electromagnetic spectrum into “ionizing” and “non-ionizing.” Ionizing radiation, which includes x-rays and atomic radiation, causes cancer. Non-ionizing radiation, which includes microwave radiation, is supposed to be safe. This distinction always reminded me of the propaganda in George Orwell’s Animal Farm: “Four legs good, two legs bad.” “Non-ionizing good, ionizing bad” is as little to be trusted.”
“An astronomer once quipped that if Neil Armstrong had taken a cell phone to the Moon in 1969, it would have appeared to be the third most powerful source of microwave radiation in the universe, next only to the Sun and the Milky Way. He was right. Life evolved with negligible levels of microwave radiation. An increasing number of scientists speculate that our own cells, in fact, use the microwave spectrum to communicate with one another, like children whispering in the dark, and that cell phones, like jackhammers, interfere with their signaling. In any case, it is a fact that we are all being bombarded, day in and day out, whether we use a cell phone or not, by an amount of microwave radiation that is some ten million times as strong as the average natural background. And it is also a fact that most of this radiation is due to technology that has been developed since the 1970s.”
from “The Largest Biological Experiment Ever”
ARTHUR FIRSTENBERG / Sun Monthly 1 jan2006
Arthur Firstenberg is founder and director of the Cellular Phone Taskforce, a nonprofit organization that disseminates information about electromagnetic radiation and advocates for electrically sensitive people. He is editor of the Taskforce’s publication, No Place to Hide, and the author of Microwaving Our Planet: The Environmental Impact of the Wireless Revolution. [Also see Killing Fields – Arthur Firstenberg / The Ecologist v.34, n.5, 1jun04]
http://www.mindfully.org/Technology/2006/Firstenberg-EMF-Experiment1jan06.htm
Although it would be great to have more knowledge and scientific research that is agreed upon about this, it is even better to have a solution.
There is one!
Every piece of electronic equipment should have a universal chip on them…your cell phone, computer, printer, scanner, gameboys, ipods, and anything wifi…
It’s easy, inexpensive and works by harmonizing the frequency to one that is healthy for you instead of harmful.
Please check out this website and order a sixpack of chips for your equipment. Then you don’t have to worry about it.
If you have kids, and they have a nintendo or whatever, please invest the extra few dollars to protect their bodies. It’s just not worth the risk.
http://www.mybiopro.com/jeannine
If you want more info, please watch these short videos:
http://emfhealthsolutions.com
I agree with you Jeannine. BioPro chips make a big difference. And for anyone who loves animals, a home harmonizer is the way to go!”
http://www.mybiopro.com/ericlaurence
Can walking in front a wifi antenna be dangerous.That is if you only do once in a while.
Thanks
lodine
news
I don’t know if walking in front of a wifi antenna can be dangerous. But you can protect yourself by wearing a BIOLife pendant. I wear one all the time, and feel much safer than if I didn’t wear it. Of course, I also have my home protected with Biopro products.
How can I acquire a BIOLife pendant?
This problem is huge, but there is a solution.
Hi. We have recently moved our home office downstairs in our home. Our two children are now sleeping in the former office. We have not yet moved our wifi antenna. My eldest son sleeps above the device and has been having dreadful nightmares. I have not considered it a cause until now. What do you think? Here I was wondering if it was his favourite cartoon, trouble at school, something we were eating at dinner…Thoughts anyone?
KASTA,
Your son having nightmares. I was thinking the same thing of my 5 year daughter. I will turn off the wi-fi next to her room.
How old is your son?
I dont like that word “The Largest Biological Experiment Ever”
Scares me
Are you guys for real?
please read a few pages of a textbook first before buying things like biolife pendants
I don’t have any BioPro products. I’ve looked into it today. The only way I see the pendants working is if they convert the EMF radiation to a less harmful form/frequency energy. I’m not saying it does or doesn’t do that. The thing is that in order for it to be affective, it would have to cover the whole body. The pendant could, in theory, convert radiation passing through it, but not attract all energy, convert, then transmit. That doesn’t make sense. The pendant would only effect its very close surrounding area. Maybe a few millimetres around it.
The cell chip is the same. It would have to be positioned between the cell phone and your head or body for it to stop any radiation effects to your body. Changing the radiation coming from cell phones would just effect how it communicates with the outside world.
A Tech Geeks opinion.
[…] telefonski tornjevi i svi mogući primo-predajnici naročito routeri kućnih bežičnih mreža ili Wi-Fi antene za bežični Internet, kompjutori s bežičnim primopredajnicima, i svi drugi bežični […]