jump to navigation

Did you know…………… January 11, 2008

Posted by healthyself in Absorption, Accelerated Aging, Addiction, Adolescents, Aging, airports, Alzheimer's, Anger, angst, Antioxidants, Anxiety, arteriosclerosis, Attention Deficit, Autism / Asperger's, Biofield, Biological Activity, Biological Dentistry, Birth Defects, Birth Rate, Blogroll, Blood Brain Barrier, Bluetooth, Brain Cancer, Brain Damage, Brain Tumors, Brainwave Interference, Breast Cancer, Bronchial Spasms, Buzzing, Canaries, Cancer, Cancer Protection, Captive Animals, Cell changes, Cell death, Cell Masts, cell membrane, Cell phone industry, Cell Phone Pulses, Cell phone safety, Cell phone towers, Cell Phone Transmissions, Cell Phones, Cellular Damage, Cellular Destruction, cellular functions, Cellular Phone Frequencies, Central Nervous System, Childhood Cancer, Children's health, Chromosomal damage, Chronic Exhaustion, Chronic Fatigue, Chronic Illness, Circulation, Computer Rooms, Consciousness, Control Group, Conversations, Cordless Phones, Cytotoxic Effects, Dangerous, Death Rates, Definitions, Denial of Risk, Dental Fillings, Detoxification, Digestion, Diseases, Disruption of cellular, DNA, DNA breakage, DNA Damage, Dolphins, Double Strand DNA breakage, Ear Tumors, EEG, EHF, Elderly, Electric Field, Electrical Components, Electrical Pulses, Electrical Wiring, Electrochemical Communications, electromagnetic, Electromagnetic Communications, Electromagnetic Field, Electromagnetic Interference, Electromagnetic Radiation, Electromagnetic Signals, Electrophysiology, Electrosensitivity, Electrosmog, ELF, Emergency Medicine, EMF Exposure, EMF Research, EMF Shielding, EMF's, EMF-induced effects, EMR, Endocrine, Endogenous Fields, Entrainment, Entropy, Environment, Epidemiologists, Epidemiology, Extremely Low Frequency, Eye Cancer, Family, Fatigue, Federal Communication Commission, Forgetfulness, Free Radicals, Frequencies, Games and Gaming, Gamma Rays, Generations, genes, genetic damage, GHz, Global Health Disaster, Ground Currents, Grounding Conductors, GSM, Hand Portables, Handheld Units, Handsets, Harmonics, Hazard, headaches, Headsets, Healing, Health, Health and Safety Officer, Health related, Health Risk, Health Risks, Health warnings, Hearing, Heart Attacks, Heart Disease, heat, Heavy Metals, Heightened Risk, HF, Hidden, High Voltage Power Line, Homes, Hormones, Hospitals, HOuseholds, HRD, Human Biological Experiment, Human Populations, Human Resources, Hz, Illness, immune and nervous funtions, Immune system, Immunity, Infant Death Syndrome, Infectious Disease, Inflammation, Infrared, Inherited, Inner Agitation, Insects, Insomnia, Interdisciplinary, International, Intuition, Investigate, Lab Tested, Lack of Concentration, Laptops, Learning, Leukemia, LF, Lifestyle, Lifetime, Light, Long Term Health Effects, Long Term Health Risks, Low Birth Weight, Low Frequencies, Lung Disorders, Lymphoma, Mad Wave Disease, Magnetic Field Exposure, Malignant, masts, Medical Research, Medicine, Melatonin, Memory, Memory Loss, Men's Health, Menstrual Cycle, Metabolic Changes, Metabolism, MHz, microchips, Microwave exposure, Microwave Ovens, Microwave Sickness, microwaves, Migraines, Military, miscarriages, Mitigation, Mitochondria, Mobile Phone Transmissions, mobile telephones, Mold, Moods, Motivation, Motor Activity, nausea, nerves, Nervous System, Neural Electrophysiology, Neurasthenia, neurological, Neurologist, neuroma, neurons, neurosurgeons, Neurotransmitters, Noise, Non-Thermal Levels, Nutrition, Occupation, Ocular, oncogenes, Optical, Oscillate, Ovaries, Pain, Pain Perception, Panic Attacks, Paralysis, Parotid Gland, Patients, Peak Absorption, Penetration, People in Laboratories, Perinatal Depressio, Permanent Brain Damage, Pesticides, Pets, PH, Phone mast, Photosensitive, Pineal Gland, plasma membrane, Poisons, Police Officers, Politics, Pollution, Potential Hydrogen, Power Densities, Power poles, Pregnant Women, Preventive Caution, Prolonged calls, Prolonged Periods, Public areas, Public Hearings, Public Policy, Quantum Physics, Questionnaires, QV, radiation, Radio Field Sickness, Radio Frequency Microwaves, Radio Frequency Radiation, Radio Transmitters, Radio Waves, Rapidly pulsing, Recommendations, Recovery, Research, Research Needed, Resonance, Resonant Frequency, Resources, Right Side of the Head, ringing, ringtones, Risk Factor, Risk of Cancer, Risk of Disease, Safe Levels, Safety, Safety Barrier, SAR, Scalar Wave, School administrators, School Boards, Schools, Seizure, Sensitivity, Serotonin, Shielding, Shields, Sick People, signaling enzymes, signaling systems, Signals, Skull, Sleep, Sleep Disorders, Sleep disturbances, Solutions, Sound, Sparrows, Speakerphones, Species-Limiting, Spine, Staph, Stress, Stroke, Studies, subcellular structures, Subtle Energies, Suffering, Suicide, Susceptibility to Infection, Switched On, Symptoms, T3-T4, Teachers, teeth grinding, Telecommunications, telemetry interference, Terrain, terrorism, Tinnitus, Tissues, Toxic Interactions, toxic particles, toxicity, Toxin, Traffic Pollution, Transmitter Towers, TSH, tumorigenesis, Tumors, Tweenies, University, University Research, Unsafe, VDT, Violence, Well-Being, Whales, Who is Affected?, WiFi, Wireless, Wireless Phones, Wireless Revolution, Wireless Transmitter, Withdrawal, Women's Health, Workplace, X bearing sperm, X-Rays, zinging/crackling.
2 comments

The largest study ever done on wireless safety, which involved over 220 scientists around the world, demonstrated clinical evidence of double strand DNA breakage caused by cell phone radiation…..proved double strand DNA breakage along with altered gene mutation as well. … Swedish neurologist … who has been doing research studies for over 15 years, has verbalized about cell phone radiation, “This is the largest human biological experiment in the history of civilization”.

….a highly respected scientist, found shocking penetration rates of radiation in children as compared to adults. These differences in exposure signify potentially serious health risks for children in the area of cancer, genetic damage, disruptions of cellular, immune and nervous system functions. Scientists say that the thickness of the skull in children makes a difference. It is quite thin compared with adults, and there is more brain fluid – which means that the radio frequencies can travel through the brain more easily .


The BEFORE photo: Only 15 minutes use of a cell phone can create significant heating of tissues in the head. The orange, red and pink colors indicate the areas being heated.

The AFTER photo was taken after 15 minutes of using the same cell phone NOW protected with BIOPRO harmonization technology! Tissue temperatures remained normal! (Blue and green indicate coolness!)

Testing Details: The testing Protocol followed the IACT… guidelines….digital infrared imaging was performed …. The thermal window used was 10 degrees Celcius with each color on the color bar representing 1 degree Celcius. The ambient room temperature remained at 20 degrees Celcius throughout the test. A 15 minute equilibration period was used. The purpose of the testing was to determine if there is a change in infrared emission of the body part near a cellular phone with and without the BIOPRO EMF-Harmonization Chips in place.

Live Blood Analysis


Control blood test of human Blood test of human subject exposed to Blood test of human subject exposed to cell phone
subject not exposed to cell cell phone radiation without any protection radiation with Cell Chip protection
phone radiation

Live Blood Analysis, EEG Brainwave and other tests prove conclusively the new revolutionary Cell Chip with the breakthrough patented Noise-field Technology and ERT effectively neutralizes the harmful effects of radiation from your cell phone.

HOW WILL YOU PROTECT YOUR FAMILY FROM ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION?

There is a simple, cost-effective, scientifically-validated way to make all of our wonderful electronic conveniences safe for you, your family, and your pets.

Unprotected exposure to EMF radiation has been shown to interfere with sleep, make you irritable, effect your concentration while driving, prematurely age and wrinkle your skin, make your children jittery and restless, make you gain weight, make you tired during the day, and decrease focus and attention, among other things.

BioPro Products energize you, keep you looking great, relieve stress, help you sleep better, and make you smile all day long. You will look younger, feel better, and smile more!

Get yours at: http://mybiopro.com/Products.aspx?ID=vibrantenergy



Cell chip Universal chip Bio Life Pendant Home Harmonizer SMART card iWater Energitically charged “ingestibles”

KEEP YOUR VISION

40 studies and proof at http://www.bioenergeticsinstitute.com

Many national and international organizations have recognized the need to define the true risk of low intensity, non-thermal RF/MW radiation exposure, calling for intensive scientific investigation to answer the open questions. These include:

  • The World Health Organization, noting reports of “cancer, reduced fertility, memory loss, and adverse changes in the behavior and development of children.”
  • Journal of American Medical Association, “talking 500 minutes per month increases the probability of brain cancer by 140%”
  • Reproductive Research Center at Cleveland Clinic, “men who carry their mobiles near the groin on a belt or in a pocket could potentially have their sperm count reduced by as much as 30 %”, also citing that less than 20 % of the sperm looked normal under the microscope.
  • Stewart Inquiry U.K. “Young people under the age of 16 are strongly advised to use mobile phones for essential purposes only and to keep those calls short”

Day in and day out, you may be exposing yourself to more stress than you thought by simply using your Cell Phone, PDA or Bluetooth headset, computers, laptops, and other devices. Electromagnetic radiation (EMR) emitted from these devices has been linked to various stress-induced problems and illnesses and could very well be compromising your health and well being. As a leader in the field of bioenergetics, BIOPRO’s suite of products are the most advanced dual action technology designed to significantly address this newest source of stress in our daily lives.

BIOPRO’s suite of products combine the benefits of two powerful, innovative and scientifically substantiated technologies: BIOPRO’s patented noise field nano-technology MRET (Molecular Resonance Effect Technology), and its proprietary subtle energy innovation ERT (Energy Resonance Technology). Individually and collectively, these cutting-edge technologies offer a groundbreaking and effective way to deal with the cumulative stress associated with living in today’s electronic environment.

Put stress on hold today and enjoy the conveniences of modern life with the one-and-only suite of synergistic products.

HOW DO THEY WORK?

Everyone who uses wireless devices or spends time in areas where other people use wireless technology needs intervention. Radio waves coming from these devices trigger responses that lead to effects ranging from anxiety disorders, learning problems, and electrosensitivity to immunological deficiencies and cancer.

Doctors have told us that the MRET and ERT technologies are a very effective combined intervention because MRET emits a field that prevents biological tissue from reacting. ERT minimizes the symptoms by restoring cellular communication. This combined intervention represents the most efficient means of controlling this radio wave damage available anywhere in the world.

HOW DO YOU KNOW THEY WORK?

This patented, nano-technology has been scientifically tested and proven in laboratories at leading medical centers and universities around the world! Here is a list of some of them:

Cedar-Sinai Medical Center (Los Angeles)

University of Washington (Seattle)

Catholic University of America

University of Western Ontario (Canada)

Columbus University

Aarhus University (Denmark)

Elixir Health Ltd., Singapore

SI Biomedical Instrumentation Co., San Diego

University of Toronto, Canada

Tex Chu Corp. Laboratory, Taipei, Taiwan

Research Institute of Bioenergetics, USA

RF Exposure Laboratory, USA

Elys Scientific Corp., St. Petersburg, Russia

Advertisements

How Long Does it Take Us to Learn….or Believe? January 11, 2008

Posted by healthyself in Accelerated Aging, Addiction, Adolescents, Aging, airports, Anxiety, Attention Deficit, Autism, Bioeffects, Biological Activity, Biological Effects, Biologically Signficant, Birth Defects, Birth Rate, Blogroll, Brainwave Interference, Cell phone industry, Cell phone safety, Cell Phones, Cellular Damage, Cellular Phone Frequencies, cellular signal transduction pathways, Central Nervous System, Childhood Cancer, Children's health, Chromosomal damage, Chronic Exhaustion, Chronic Fatigue, Chronic Illness, Clear Link, Conversations, Cordless Phones, Dangerous, Denial of Risk, Diabetes, Diseases, DNA Damage, Electrical Components, Electrical Pulses, Electrical Surges, Electromagnetic Communications, Electromagnetic Field, Electromagnetic Forces, Electromagnetic Interference, Electromagnetic pollution, Electromagnetic Radiation, Electromagnetic Signals, Electromagnetic Spectrum, Electrosensitivity, Electrosmog, ELF, EMF Exposure, EMF Research, EMF-induced effects, Environment, Epidemiologists, Epidemiology, Fatigue, Financial Considerations, Frequencies, Global Health Disaster, Hand Portables, Handheld Units, Handsets, headaches, Healing, Health, Health and Safety Officer, Health related, Health Risk, Health Risks, Health warnings, High Frequencies, High Voltage Power Line, high voltage transmission lines, Hospitals, HOuseholds, HRD, Human Populations, Human Resources, Immune system, Infant Death Syndrome, Infectious Disease, Inflammation, Inner Agitation, Interdisciplinary, Kids, Legal Issues, Lifestyle, Lifetime, Long Term Health Effects, Long Term Health Risks, Low Frequencies, Medical Research, Memory Loss, Men's Health, Metabolic Changes, MHz, Microwave exposure, Migraines, Mobile Phone Transmissions, mobile telephones, Nervous System, Neural Electrophysiology, neurological, Neurotransmitters, Pain Perception, Panic Attacks, Peak Absorption, Penetration, Pets, Pollution, Pregnant Women, Public areas, Public Policy, Research, Research Needed, Risk, Risk Factor, Risk of Cancer, Risk of Disease, Rooflines, Safe Levels, Safety, SAR, Sleep Disorders, Sleep disturbances, Speakerphones, Stand-by Mode, Stress, Stroke, Studies, Susceptibility to Infection, Symptoms, Tinnitus, Toxic Interactions, Traffic Pollution, Transmitter Towers, Tweenies, University, University Research, Violence, Well-Being, Who is Affected?, WiFi, Wireless, Wireless Phones, Wireless Revolution, Women's Health, Workplace, X bearing sperm.
4 comments
Yesterday.


A November 20th 1960 ad from the New York Mirror magazine.

Today.

                                              

What is Non-Ionizing Radiation? April 6, 2007

Posted by healthyself in 0 Hz-3kHz, 000 Hz, 1 GHz- 300 GHz, 1 mm, 100 nm - 400 nm, 3 kHz-300 GHz, 300 GHz, 400 nm - 700 nm, 700 nm, Amplified Signals, Amplitude, Analog, Antennas, Atmospheric Pressure, Blogroll, Bytes, Cable, Cell Masts, Cell Phones, Coherence, Computer Rooms, Cordless Phones, DECT, Distribution, Earth, EEG, EHF, Electrical Components, Electrical Pulses, Electrical Surges, Electrical Wiring, electromagnetic, Electromagnetic Communications, Electromagnetic Field, Electromagnetic Interference, Electromagnetic pollution, Electromagnetic Radiation, Electromagnetic Spectrum, Electromagnetic waves, Electrosensitivity, Electrosmog, ELF, EMF Research, EMF's, EMR, Entropy, Environment, Exposure, Fiber Optic, Frequencies, Hand Portables, Handheld Units, HF, High Frequencies, high voltage transmission lines, Internet, ionizing radiation, Landline, Laptops, LF, Lifestyle, Light, light beam, Long Term Health Risks, Low Frequencies, Magnetic, MCS, MF, MHz, Microwave exposure, Mobile Music, mobile telephones, Non-Thermal Levels, Penetration, Photons, Photosensitive, Pulsed Radiation, Pulses, Pure Tone, QV, Radar, Radians, radiation, Radio Frequency Radiation, Radio Waves, radioprotector, Radios, Research Needed, Resonance, Resonant Frequency, ringing, ringtones, Risk of Disease, Safe Levels, Safety, SAR, Schuman Resonance, SHF, Speakerphones, Spectrum, Telecommunications, Telephony, Transducer, Transfer, transmission, UHF, Ultraviolet, VDT, Visible Light, VLF, W/Kg, W/m2, watts, Wave Front, Waves, Who is Affected?, WiFi, Wired, Wired Phone, Wireless, Wireless Phones, X-Rays.
add a comment

Definitions

The properties and effects of non-ionising radiations are very diverse. For the purpose of this Policy non-ionising radiations include:

Extremely low frequency (ELF) radiation

Electromagnetic radiation with frequencies in the range 0 Hz (static fields) to 3 kHz, including the 50 Hz electric and magnetic fields associated with the domestic mains electricity supply such as in domestic electrical appliances, electricity supply substations and overhead power lines.

Radiofrequency (RF) radiation

Electromagnetic radiation with frequencies in the range 3 kHz to 300 GHz, which is produced by artificial sources such as visual display units and mobile phones.

Microwave (MW) radiation

Electromagnetic radiation with frequencies in the range 1 GHz to 300 GHz, which is produced by artificial sources such as in microwave ovens and by microwave communication devices. (This radiation is now considered part of Radiofrequency radiation.)

Infrared (IR) radiation

Electromagnetic radiation with wavelengths between 700 nm and 1 mm, which is present in sunlight and produced by artificial sources such as electric radiator heaters.

Visible light

Electromagnetic radiation with wavelengths between 400 nm (blue) and 700 nm (red), which is present in sunlight and produced by numerous artificial sources, including lasers.

Ultraviolet (UV) radiation

Electromagnetic radiation with wavelengths between 100 nm and 400 nm, which is present in sunlight as well as produced by artificial sources such as arc welding and sterilization lamps.

http://www.unisa.edu.au/policies/policies/hr/HR30.asp

What are Electric and Magnetic Fields? April 6, 2007

Posted by healthyself in Blogroll, Definitions, Earth, Electrical Components, Electrical Pulses, Electrical Surges, Electrical Wiring, electromagnetic, Electromagnetic Field, Electromagnetic Radiation, Electromagnetic waves, EMF's, EMR, Environment, Frequencies, High Frequencies, high voltage transmission lines, Hz, LF, Light, light beam, Low Frequencies, Magnetic, MCS, MF, MHz, Microwave exposure, Pulsed Radiation, Pulses, Radar, Radians, radiation, Radio Frequency Radiation, Radio Waves, Resonant Frequency, Safe Levels, Transducer, transmission, UHF, VDT, VLF, W/Kg, W/m2, watts, Wave Front, Waves.
add a comment

Electric fields

Magnetic fields

  1. Electric fields arise from voltage.
  2. Their strength is measured in Volts per metre (V/m)
  3. An electric field can be present even when a device is switched off.
  4. Field strength decreases with distance from the source.
  5. Most building materials shield electric fields to some extent.
  1. Magnetic fields arise from current flows.
  2. Their strength is measured in amperes per meter (A/m). Commonly, EMF investigators use a related measure, flux density (in microtesla (µT) or millitesla (mT) instead.
  3. Magnetic fields exist as soon as a device is switched on and current flows.
  4. Field strength decreases with distance from the source.
  5. Magnetic fields are not attenuated by most mat

http://www.who.int/peh-emf/about/WhatisEMF/en/

Protection Against Ionizing Radiation April 5, 2007

Posted by healthyself in Animal Research, Antioxidants, Bioeffects, Biological Activity, Biological Effects, Blogroll, Brain Cancer, Breast Cancer, Cancer Protection, Cell changes, cell membrane, Cells, Children's health, Chromosomal damage, Cordless Phones, Cytotoxic Effects, Electrical Pulses, Electrical Surges, Electrical Wiring, Electromagnetic Communications, Electromagnetic Field, Electromagnetic pollution, Electromagnetic Radiation, Electromagnetic waves, Electrosensitivity, Electrosmog, ELF, Emergency Medicine, EMF Research, EMF's, EMR, Endocrine, Environment, Epidemiology, Free Radicals, Frequencies, genetic damage, Health related, HF, High Frequencies, high voltage transmission lines, Homes, HOuseholds, Hz, Immune system, Insomnia, Interdisciplinary, ionizing radiation, Long Term Health Risks, Low Frequencies, Lymphoma, Medical Research, Melatonin, Metabolic Changes, MF, MHz, Microwave exposure, Networks, Non-Thermal Levels, Oscillate, Penetration, Pineal Gland, Pulsed Radiation, Pulses, radiation, Radio Waves, radioprotector, Research, Research Needed, ringtones, Risk of Disease, Safe Levels, scavenger, Sick People, Sleep disturbances, Solutions, Stress, subcellular structures, Symptoms, Telecommunications, terrorism, toxicity, Who is Affected?, Workplace, X-Rays.
add a comment

“Melatonin (N-acetyl-5-methoxytryptamine), the chief secretory product of the pineal gland in the brain, is well known for its functional versatility. In hundreds of investigations, melatonin has been documented as a direct free radical scavenger and an indirect antioxidant, as well as an important immunomodulatory agent. The radical scavenging ability of melatonin is believed to work via electron donation to detoxify a variety of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species, including the highly toxic hydroxyl radical. It has long been recognized that the damaging effects of ionizing radiation are brought about by both direct and indirect mechanisms. The direct action produces disruption of sensitive molecules in the cells, whereas the indirect effects ( approximately 70%) result from its interaction with water molecules, which results in the production of highly reactive free radicals such as *OH, *H, and e(aq)- and their subsequent action on subcellular structures. The hydroxyl radical scavenging ability of melatonin was used as a rationale to determine its radioprotective efficiency. Indeed, the results from many in vitro and in vivo investigations have confirmed that melatonin protects mammalian cells from the toxic effects of ionizing radiation. Furthermore, several clinical reports indicate that melatonin administration, either alone or in combination with traditional radiotherapy, results in a favorable efficacy:toxicity ratio during the treatment of human cancers. This article reviews the literature from laboratory investigations that document the ability of melatonin to scavenge a variety of free radicals (including the hydroxyl radical induced by ionizing radiation) and summarizes the evidence that should be used to design larger translational research-based clinical trials using melatonin as a radioprotector and also in cancer radiotherapy. The potential use of melatonin for protecting individuals from radiation terrorism is also considered.”

Melatonin as a radioprotective agent: a review.

Vijayalaxmi, Reiter RJ, Tan DX, Herman TS, Thomas CR Jr.

Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, 78229, USA. vijay@uthscsa.edu

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=15183467

High Frequency Electromagnetic Fields April 5, 2007

Posted by healthyself in Amplified Signals, Amplitude, Antennas, Blogroll, Cable, Cell Masts, Cell phone industry, Cell phone safety, Cell Phones, Computer Rooms, Cordless Phones, Definitions, Digital, Distribution, Electrical Components, Electrical Pulses, Electrical Wiring, Electromagnetic Communications, Electromagnetic Field, Electromagnetic Interference, Electromagnetic pollution, Electromagnetic Radiation, Electromagnetic Spectrum, Electromagnetic waves, Electrosensitivity, Electrosmog, ELF, Emergency Medicine, EMF Research, EMF's, EMR, Energy, Environment, Epidemiology, Exposure, Frequencies, GHz, Government's role, HF, High Frequencies, high voltage transmission lines, Homes, HOuseholds, HRD, Human Resources, Hz, Infrared, Interdisciplinary, Landline, Laptops, Legal Issues, Lifestyle, Low Frequencies, MCS, MF, MHz, Microwave exposure, Mitigation, mobile telephones, Oscillate, Pulsed Radiation, Pulses, Radar, radiation, Radio Frequency Radiation, Radio Waves, Radios, Research Needed, Resonant Frequency, Risk of Disease, Sound, Speakerphones, Telecommunications, Telephony, Transducer, Transfer, transmission, UHF, VDT, VLF, W/Kg, W/m2, watts, Wave Front, Waves, Who is Affected?, WiFi, Wired, Wired Phone, Wireless, Wireless Phones, Workplace, X-Rays.
add a comment

“Mobile telephones, television and radio transmitters and radar produce RF fields. These fields are used to transmit information over long distances and form the basis of telecommunications as well as radio and television broadcasting all over the world. Microwaves are RF fields at high frequencies in the GHz range. In microwaves ovens, we use them to quickly heat food.””At radio frequencies, electric and magnetic fields are closely interrelated and we typically measure their levels as power densities in watts per square metre (W/m2).”

“Key points:

  • The electromagnetic spectrum encompasses both natural and human-made sources of electromagnetic fields.
  • Frequency and wavelength characterise an electromagnetic field. In an electromagnetic wave, these two characteristics are directly related to each other: the higher the frequency the shorter the wavelength.
  • Ionizing radiation such as X-ray and gamma-rays consists of photons which carry sufficient energy to break molecular bonds. Photons of electromagnetic waves at power and radio frequencies have much lower energy that do not have this ability.
  • Electric fields exist whenever charge is present and are measured in volts per metre (V/m). Magnetic fields arise from current flow. Their flux densities are measured in microtesla (µT) or millitesla (mT).
  • At radio and microwave frequencies, electric and magnetic fields are considered together as the two components of an electromagnetic wave. Power density, measured in watts per square metre (W/m2), describes the intensity of these fields.
  • Low frequency and high frequency electromagnetic waves affect the human body in different ways.
  • Electrical power supplies and appliances are the most common sources of low frequency electric and magnetic fields in our living environment. Everyday sources of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields are telecommunications, broadcasting antennas and microwave ovens.”

http://www.who.int/peh-emf/about/WhatisEMF/en/

Sleep Problems, the use of CPAP and BIPAP machines, and Electromagnetic Concerns April 2, 2007

Posted by healthyself in Bioeffects, Biological Activity, Biological Dentistry, Biological Effects, BIPAP, Blogroll, Brainwave Interference, Buzzing, Central Nervous System, Chronic Exhaustion, Chronic Fatigue, Consciousness, CPAP, Cytotoxic Effects, Decision Making, Definitions, Electrical Components, Electrical Pulses, Electrical Surges, Electrical Wiring, Electromagetic pollution, Electromagnetic Interference, Electromagnetic pollution, Electromagnetic Radiation, Electromagnetic waves, Electrosensitivity, Electrosmog, ELF, Emergency Medicine, EMF's, Employees, EMR, Energy Centers, Environment, Epidemiologists, Epidemiology, Exposure, Frequencies, grams of tissue, Health, Health and Safety Officer, Health related, Homes, Hospitals, HOuseholds, HRD, Human Resources, Hz, Inflammation, Insomnia, Interdisciplinary, Lifestyle, Long Term Health Risks, Low Frequencies, Medical Research, Melatonin, Men's Health, Metabolic Changes, MF, MHz, Microwave exposure, Mitigation, Neural Electrophysiology, neurological, Neurotransmitters, Non Profit Organizations, Parenting, Pulsed Radiation, Pulses, radiation, Radio Frequency Radiation, Research, Research Needed, Resonance, Resonant Frequency, Risk Factor, Risk of Disease, Sick People, signaling enzymes, Skull, Sleep, Sleep Centers, Sleep disturbances, Solutions, Stress, Symptoms, Toxic Interactions, University, Vibration, VLF, watts, Waves, Who is Affected?, Wired, Women's Health, yawning.
5 comments

Do you use a machine to help you sleep?

You may be exposing yourself to increased pulsed radiation.

“…any machine that is operational will be putting forth a magnetic field. Considering the fact that both the cpap and bipap are strictly to insure respiration makes them a higher priority for health than the EMFs. Thus the only consideration is to convert the MF to a less invasive form. There are several devices that can be applied to these and any other electrical devices to decrease the effects of the EMFs. If that suggestion does not fall completely within your level of acceptability you might try to convince the manufacturers to come with a longer hose in order to create a greater distance from the actual pump.”

Dr. Howard Fisher

Watch for Dr. Fisher’s upcoming book: “The Invisible Threat: The Risks sssociated ith EMFs,” which will be released soon.

Danger for Children and Staff in Schools April 2, 2007

Posted by healthyself in .1W/m2, 10 W/m2, 23000 uWatt/mw, Bioeffects, Biological Activity, Biological Effects, Blogroll, Bluetooth, Cable, Children's health, Chromosomal damage, Communication, Community, Computer Rooms, Cytotoxic Effects, Decision Making, DECT, Distribution, Electrical Components, Electrical Pulses, Electrical Surges, Electrical Wiring, Electromagnetic Communications, Electromagnetic Field, Electromagnetic pollution, Electromagnetic Radiation, Electromagnetic waves, Electrosensitivity, Electrosmog, ELF, Emergency Medicine, EMF Research, EMF's, Employees, EMR, Environment, Epidemiologists, Epidemiology, Exposure, Financial Considerations, Frequencies, genetic damage, Government's role, grams of tissue, Hand Portables, Handheld Units, Health and Safety Officer, Health related, High Frequencies, HRD, Human Resources, Hz, Interdisciplinary, Kids, Landline, Laptops, Lifestyle, Long Term Health Risks, Low Frequencies, Men's Health, Metabolic Changes, MHz, Music, Networks, Non Profit Organizations, Parenting, Public Policy, radiation, Radio Frequency Radiation, Research, Research Needed, Risk Factor, Risk of Disease, Safe Levels, Safety, SAR, School administrators, School Boards, Schools, Solutions, Symptoms, Teenagers, Toxic Interactions, transmission, Tweenies, watts, Who is Affected?, WiFi, Wired, Wireless, Women's Health, Workplace.
add a comment

Health Dangers From Wireless Laptops Danger from high frequency fields

“Under the motto of ‘increasing efficiency’, things are happening in many schools in an almost unnoticed and uncritical manner, which would have lead to animated discussions and actions in the past. Without informing or consulting staff, the federal state of Hessen has equipped around 100 schools with laptops in the name of ‘increased media competence’, ’new learning culture’ and ‘better education’. “…”By installing these new student workstations, the government and education authorities are introducing a new technology, against which there are strong concerns about potential health effects. According to the initiative ‘Schools and Future’, in which the government and local education authorities co-operate, ‘only WLAN is to be considered’, when it comes to laptops in schools. This WLAN technology (Wireless Local Area Networks) currently pushed by the authorities, consists of a transmitter installed in the classroom or school via which the students communicate with each other, with the periphery hardware and with the internet. In this case, each laptop is a sender and a receiver. …each workstation emits high frequency electromagnetic fields, which are generally acknowledged to have harmful effects on health. …the ‘large number of studies lead to the conclusion that living organisms react to this radiation’. Precautionary health protection is therefore urgently recommended, especially if we consider the experiences from the past, when the careless use of substances like wood preservatives, asbestos and CFCs lead to devastating health hazards and financial losses, also in schools.”

High frequency radiation

“With a network within one room it is still mostly an individual decision whether the students are linked with each other via cable or wireless. If the network extends through the entire school, the staff has no possibility to decide whether they agree to be exposed to the additional radiation or not. Similar to the situation in the waiting areas in airports and large train stations, they are exposed all working day long to the electromagnetic fields from the WLAN transmitters. Exposures within a building can vary to a large degree. Overlaps and reflections can create radiation hotspots which go completely unnoticed.”

The magazine Eco-Test [Translator’s note: an ecological equivalent of the UK Which magazine] tested workstations in the juristic library in Göttingen and found a peak value of 23,000 µWatt/m2. The current official guideline in Germany [and in the UK] is 10 W/m2. Without cable connections, a WLAN-installation must also be switched on at night and linked via radio link to the network, since it is then that the remote maintenance of the school transmitter with the docked-on laptops is done. In November 2002, Eco-Test magazine found in a large study that particularly laptops which are sending information and their WLAN cards emit considerable amounts of radiation. This radiation is often considerable higher than the recommended precautionary values and in hotspots even exceeds the official guidelines. Likewise, the Nova-Institute had previously found in its study regarding the installation of a WLAN network at the University of Bremen that persons working on notebook workstations had to ‘count on the precautionary values being exceeded’.

“In addition to the already existing massive interference from unnatural electromagnetic fields from sources such as mobile phones, DECT (cordless) phones, microwave ovens and computer screens, children, adolescents and staff are now exposed to additional health hazards which would be easily avoidable. It is possible without any quantitative or qualitative sacrifice, to use any laptop with a cable and hence to avoid the additional radiation load created by a WLAN installation. Only a cable is needed to link the laptop with the network, and the peripheral hardware such as a central printer can be connected via plug-ins as well.”

Almost all arguments go against WLAN!

“In addition to the precautionary aspect, it would be cheaper for schools and local education authorities to equip schools with wired networks, since they do not incur cost for the radio (wireless). Further arguments against WLAN technology are its susceptibility to exterior influences on data transmission, its slower operational speed when compared to wired networks, its lower capacity, its limited suitability for the use in exams and its higher rate of disruption in everyday use. Exterior pressures and industry interest however, seem to outweigh all the health, technical, financial and pedagogical objections. Doubts and objections are probably not least ignored in order to further the quick implementation and testing of this new technology which promises much profit in a large-scale experiment. In some school districts, the technology is even ‘trialled’ in primary schools. Children are degraded to become test subjects.”

“There are hardly any ways to legally raise objections: ‘WLAN equipment works within the legal guidelines’ is the official justification. However, the legal basis for this, the Electromagnetic Fields Ordinance of 1996 (!) set the guidelines only based on the thermal effects of this radiation. Yet, pulsed high frequency fields are proven to have effects at power flux densities much lower than the thermal threshold. They cause headaches, high blood pressure and lack of concentration and can lead to permanent health damage. The ECOLOG Institute in Hanover has produced a science review of more than 220 peer reviewed and published studies of the various health effects of electromagnetic fields [Translator’s note: commissioned by T-Mobile, Germany] and confirmed them on a scientific basis.”

“To protect public health it is therefore no longer sufficient to apply the old, inadequate guidelines, but to introduce a new precautionary guideline, which will take all influences on health known so far into account, and which would need to be categorically adhered to with regards to the assessment of all radiation exposure. Switzerland has already implemented this. There, the precautionary upper limit for power flux density is 0.1 W/m².This is 1/100 of the current guideline value in Germany [Translator’s note: and 1/100 of the current guideline value of the UK]. ”

Based on their comprehensive science review, the ECOLOG-Institute recommends

0.01 W//m² as the precautionary upper limit. Even at this value, studies found negative influences on brain function – EEC, capacity to react, blood-brain-barrier permeability.”

Eco-Test found exposures higher than these precautionary values in the vicinity of several laptops during their on-site studies. ”

Almost criminal assault

“The uncritical IT equipment of schools with transmitters and radiation emitting laptops does not take into account that the main users are children and adolescents who will be exposed for many hours every day.”

“In the UK, the Independent Expert Group commissioned by the government in 2000 came to the conclusion that children – due to their not yet fully developed nervous system and a circa 60% higher susceptibility to energetic radiation – were far more vulnerable than adults. Hence, there should be even stricter precautionary guidelines for children. To expose children knowingly to this danger is bordering criminal assault.”

“Also often ignored is the fact that it is not just one device emitting the pulsed high frequency radiation, but that there are usually 20 or more workstations per classroom. And this in an environment which is already riddled with further sources of unnatural radiation such as fluorescent lighting halogen lamps, mobile phones and transformers. It can therefore not be excluded that an overlap of these fields will cause the electromagnetic exposure at individual workstations to greatly exceed the precautionary guidelines. ”

“Admittedly, the electromagnetic radiation of a single laptop is below that of a mobile phone. The effect of electromagnetic radiation being accumulative, it will however, increase the intensity of ‘electro-smog’. The duration of use also plays an important role: it can be many hours per day, especially for IT teachers and students. Particular protection must be provided for electrosensitive people, for whom electromagnetic radiation triggers allergic reactions. They account for 3 – 5 % of the population.” …..”The summary of the arguments presented in this article should be sufficient to object to the WLAN project of the federal state government and the education authorities with a loud and clear ‘NO, no transmitters in schools and other public institutions!’ In addition to WLAN, this also includes wireless Bluetooth equipment, DECT and mobile phones. Cabled equipment results in higher data speeds and better results. Protection and precaution against health damage should be more important than the slightly ore convenient use of wireless equipment.”

“The Union for Education and Science and all the Union representatives on the federal state, town, council and school level must exert their influence to have policies in favour of wireless equipment revised and ensure that children and staff in schools are not knowingly exposed to additional health hazards from electromagnetic fields.”…” the precautionary principle should prevail and human health should be in the centre of interest. Further research results can be expected from the REFLEX study, which was commissioned by the EU and is currently being conducted in participating countries across Europe. It examines amongst other things the effect of electromagnetic radiation on human tissue. …”
From the Union Magazine „GEW Hessen“, Nr I2/2003

http://omega.twoday.net/stories/1755556/

Do You Feel Bioeffects from Electromagnetic Radiation? October 28, 2006

Posted by healthyself in Alzheimer's, Anxiety, Attention Deficit, Biochemical, Bioeffects, Biological Activity, Biological Dentistry, Biological Effects, Blogroll, Buzzing, Cardiac Problems, Cell Phones, Children's health, Chronic Exhaustion, Chronic Fatigue, Chronic Illness, Circulation, Clicks, Cordless Phones, Diagnostic marker, Digestion, Dizziness, Ear, ear ache, Electrical Pulses, electromagnetic, Electromagnetic Communications, Electromagnetic Field, Electromagnetic Interference, Electromagnetic pollution, Electromagnetic Radiation, Electromagnetic waves, Electrosensitivity, Electrosmog, ELF, Emergency Medicine, EMF Research, EMF's, Environment, Exposure, Fatigue, Frequencies, Health related, Hearing, Heart Disease, HOuseholds, HRD, Inner Agitation, Insomnia, Integrative Medicine, Interdisciplinary, Lack of Concentration, Lifestyle, Long Term Health Risks, MCS, Memory Loss, MHz, Microwave exposure, mobile telephones, nausea, Pain, Pain Perception, Panic Attacks, Paralysis, Pulsed Radiation, Pulses, Research Needed, ringing, Risk Factor, Risk of Disease, Seizure, sensations, Sick People, Sleep disturbances, Stress, Tinnitus, Toxic Interactions, Vibration, Vibrational Medicine, zinging/crackling.
4 comments

“In a recent ES survey, the five most common symptoms experienced when exposed to electromagnetic fields (EMFs) which are present wherever electric current is running, and which should be considered warning signs, were:
skin itch/rash/flushing/burning and/or tingling,
confusion/poor concentration and/or memory loss,
fatigue/weakness,
headache, brain fog, ‘insects crawling’
and chest pain/heart problems.

“Skin problems and memory difficulties tied for first place among the overall symptoms.”
“Research by Professor Olle Johansson at the Karolinska Health Institute in Sweden has objectively confirmed the skin bioeffects using typical mobile phone frequencies. Less commonly reported symptoms included nausea, panic attacks, insomnia, seizures, ear pain/ringing in the ears, feeling a vibration, paralysis, and dizziness. Some ES patients experience only one symptom when EMF exposed, or afterwards, but more often more than one symptom is apparent.””We believe ES results in a special kind of tinnitus, zinging/crackling/clicking rather than whistling/singing. With cardiac effects it is the rhythm that is disturbed, resulting in racing, but also brachycardia, or slowing down.”

“There are many more details all over this website [link below], including personal accounts of what it is like, it frequently is associated with multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS), there is an unfortunate synergy between the two reactions both contributing to worsening the other.”

“In Sweden ES, or EHS (Electrically Hyper-Sensitive), is an officially recognised condition with 285,000 registered sufferers….”

http://www.electrosensitivity.org.uk/

EMF’s and Cordless Phones October 22, 2006

Posted by healthyself in 1800 MHz, 1800-2000 MHz, 800-1800 MHz, Biochemical, Bioeffects, Biological Activity, Biological Dentistry, Biological Effects, Blogroll, Blood, Blood Cells, Cell changes, Cells, Childhood Leukemia, Children's health, Chronic Illness, cognition, Communication, Conversations, Cordless Phones, Cytotoxic Effects, Decision Making, DECT, Electrical Components, Electrical Pulses, Electrical Surges, Electrical Wiring, Electromagnetic Communications, Electromagnetic Field, Electromagnetic Interference, Electromagnetic pollution, Electromagnetic Radiation, Electromagnetic Spectrum, Electromagnetic waves, Electrosensitivity, Electrosmog, ELF, Emergency Medicine, EMF Research, EMF's, EMR, Environment, Exposure, Frequencies, genes, genetic damage, Government's role, GSM, Health related, HF, High Frequencies, high voltage transmission lines, HOuseholds, Hz, Interdisciplinary, Landline, Legal Issues, Leukemia, LF, Lifestyle, Long Term Health Risks, Lymphoma, Medical Research, Meditation, Men's Health, MF, MHz, Microwave exposure, mobile telephones, Monitoring, Parenting, PCN, Public Policy, Pulsed Radiation, Pulses, radiation, Radio Frequency Radiation, Radio Waves, Radios, Research, Research Needed, Risk Factor, Risk of Disease, Stress, Waves, Who is Affected?, Wired Phone, Women's Health.
3 comments

What About The Cordless Phones I Use In My House?

“Digital cordless phones and their base units emit pulsed microwaves and these can exceed the levels from an actual mobile phone in areas where the mobile phone service has good signal strengths. Holding a digital cordless (DECT) phone to their head will always expose the user to higher levels of microwave fields than they will ever experience (in public access areas) from a mobile phone base-station. Most DECT base units continuously emit pulsed microwave radiation even when no call is in progress. The level is typically still over 3 V/m half a meter away from the base unit and can be over 1 V/m in rooms directly above. These are higher field levels than those measured from a typical mobile phone mast. If you are concerned about the potential adverse health effects from microwave radiation, you might want to think carefully about whether you want a DECT phone in your house. If you want it to monitor incoming calls when you are, for instance, at the bottom of the garden, then answer the call briefly, and have the main conversation on a normal wired phone when you go back inside. All types of microwave exposure at the levels received from handset use have been shown to produce genetic damage inside blood cells. Radio frequency radiation has been used for a variety of covert purposes for some :considerable time. It was used to deter the women at Greenham Common, some of whom still suffer ongoing health problems. The Soviet’s irradiation of the US embassy in Moscow produced serous adverse health effects, including Ieukaemias and lymphomas, was the conclusion reached by a relatively recent re-analysis of the Lilienfeld report (Refs) based on information from USA Defense Intelligence Agency papers that only became fully available following the Freedom Information Act. Over 23 years ago the US was well aware of both cognitive and biochemical changes in the brains of adults exposed to pulsed microwave radiation. It is also interesting to note that the microwave frequencies the Russians used in many of their microwave weapon experiments were around 1800 MHz the same as is now used in Europe for GSMI800 / PCN and for DECT cordless phones.”

http://www.foresight-preconception.org.uk/booklet_geopathicstress.htm