jump to navigation

Cell Towers Moved Out of Schools! May 30, 2008

Posted by healthyself in "Cellular" Relay Antennas, Adolescents, Bioeffects, Biological Effects, Blogroll, Broadcast Antennas, Cancer Protection, Cell Masts, Cell phone industry, Cell phone safety, Cell phone towers, Cell Phone Transmissions, Cellular Phone Frequencies, Children's health, Cordless Phones, Danger, Dangerous, Decision Making, Denial of Risk, Electromagnetic pollution, Electromagnetic Radiation, Electromagnetic Signals, Electromagnetic waves, Electrosensitivity, Electrosmog, ELF, EMF Exposure, EMF Research, EMF's, EMF-induced effects, Environment, Generations, Government's role, Guidelines, Health related, Health Risk, Health Risks, Health warnings, Heightened Risk, Human Populations, Kids, Lifestyle, Lifetime, Long Term Health Effects, Long Term Health Risks, masts, Men's Health, microwaves, Mobile Music, Mobile Phone Transmissions, mobile telephones, Monitoring, Monitoring Authorities, Parenting, Phone mast, Public areas, Public Policy, Pulsed Radiation, radiation, Recommendations, Research Needed, Risk, Risk Factor, Risk of Disease, School administrators, School Boards, School yards, Schools, Sufficient Evidence, Teachers, Teenagers, Transmitter Towers, Tweenies, Unsafe, Who is Affected?, Wireless, Wireless Phones, Wireless Revolution, Wireless Technologies, Women's Health, Workplace.
Tags: ,
1 comment so far

27 May 2008, 0545 hrs IST,Somdatta Basu,TNN


“KOLKATA: Cellphone towers could soon have to steer clear of schools and hospitals in Kolkata as the state environment department perceives them as a potential health and safety hazard.”

“A list of guidelines issued by the department has decreed that installation of base station antennas on the premises of schools and hospitals “may be avoided because children and patients are more susceptible to electromagnetic fields.”The order”…..”mentions that antennas be avoided in narrow lanes to reduce the risks caused by an earthquake or wind-related disaster.”…..”the antennas should be at least 3 metre from the nearest building and should not directly face it, and that the lower end of the towers should be at least 3 metres above the ground or roof. Barbed-wire fences should keep antenna sites barred to the public, it has said. And access to towers, the government has suggested, be kept to the minimum, even for maintenance personnel.”

“Cellphone firms have asked to put up warning signs and ensure that these are “clearly visible and identifiable”. A warning sign has been prescribed at the entrance of such zone. Such signs should carry cautionary notes discouraging people — even maintenance personnel — from staying too long in the zone. The environment department has suggested that the sign boards may contain the following text: Danger! RF radiation, Do not enter!

“Operators and maintenance personnel…should be protected from electromagnetic radiation, the state says. It has advised cellphone firms to educate personnel on the possible hazards from these devices.”

“Cellphone service providers were guarded in their response”….”researchers felt it was still too early to reach a conclusion ….You need to study an entire generation to come to a definite conclusion. But precautions are always welcome”…”There were complaints from several districts. Many schools said mobile towers were being erected on their roofs and in nearby areas….”

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Kolkata_/Cell_towers_moved_out_of_schools/articleshow/3075285.cms


Advertisements

Information about EMF’s on Larry King Live May 29, 2008

Posted by healthyself in Accelerated Aging, Bioeffects, Biological Activity, Biological Effects, Biologically Signficant, Blogroll, Brain Damage, Brain Stress, Cancer, Cancer Protection, Cell Cultures, Cell phone safety, Cell Phone Transmissions, Cell Phones, Children's health, Cognitive Function, Conversations, Cordless Phones, Cordless Telephone Base Units, Dangerous, Death, earphones, Electromagetic pollution, Electromagnetic Communications, Electromagnetic Field, Electromagnetic Forces, Electromagnetic Interference, Electromagnetic pollution, Electromagnetic Radiation, Electromagnetic Signals, Electromagnetic Spectrum, Electromagnetic waves, Electrophysiology, Electrosensitive, Electrosensitivity, ELF, EMF Exposure, EMF Research, EMF's, Environment, Epidemiology, Exposure, Extra-Sensory Perception, Frequencies, Guidelines, Health, Health related, Health Risk, Health Risks, Health warnings, HOuseholds, HRD, Human Populations, Immune system, Infectious Disease, Interdisciplinary, Legal Issues, Lifestyle, Long Term Health Effects, Long Term Health Risks, Medical Research, Men', Men's Health, Parenting, Pulsed Radiation, radiation, Research, Research Needed, Right Side of the Head, Risk, Risk Factor, Risk of Cancer, Risk of Disease, Safe Levels, Safety Barrier, sensations, Sufficient Evidence, Symptoms, Teenagers, Who is Affected?, Wireless, Wireless Phones, Women's Health.
add a comment

http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/bestoftv/2008/05/28/lkl.cell.cancer.cnn

Medical Devices and Electromagnetic Interference January 24, 2008

Posted by healthyself in Blogroll, Blow Dryers, Electromagnetic Communications, Electromagnetic Forces, Electromagnetic Interference, Electromagnetic pollution, Electromagnetic Radiation, Electromagnetic Signals, Electromagnetic waves, Electrophysiology, Electrosmog, Elevators, ELF, Emergency Medicine, EMF Exposure, EMF Research, EMF's, EMF-induced effects, EMI, Emissions, EMR, Florescent Light Balasts, Health Care, Health Care Facilities, Medical Devices, Noisy Electric Motors, Walkie Talkies, Wireless Technologies.
6 comments

cell-phones“The delivery of health care is an inherently mobile activity, with patients moving though the care delivery process and almost all health care workers in constant motion. So it’s no wonder that wireless technologies have been adopted with gusto.”

“Electromagnetic interference (EMI) has been a concern with medical devices since their inception. This EMI can be divided into intentional and unintentional interference. Intentional interference typically comes from radio frequency (RF) radiators like walkie-talkies, wireless phones, WiFi radios, and cell phones that use frequencies and specified power levels that may interfere with the operation of other radios or electronic devices. Unintentional interference is caused by things like paper shredders, bad florescent light ballasts, and noisy electric motors (from blow dryers to elevators). ”

“Any electronic device can be affected by EMI, including medical devices. The wireless features of medical devices (or any other wireless device, for that matter) can also be affected. The larger medical device vendors have dedicated engineers and techs who do EMI testing and troubleshoot interference problems at customer sites.”

“In an effort to promote best practices regarding the use of mobile wireless communications and computing technologies in health care facilities, standards committees TC 215 and ISO 35.240.80 have created recommendations for electromagnetic compatibility (management of unintentional electromagnetic interference) with medical devices.”

“Here’s the abstract:

“ISO/TR 21730:2007 provides guidance for the deployment, use and management of mobile wireless communication and computing equipment in healthcare facilities in a way that promotes effective electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) among the wireless technology and active medical devices through mitigation of potential hazards due to electromagnetic interference (EMI). The recommendations given recognize the different resources, needs, concerns and environments of healthcare organizations around the world, and provide detailed management guidelines for healthcare organizations that desire full deployment of mobile wireless communication and computing technology throughout their facilities. In addition, suggestions are included for selective restrictions in cases where healthcare organizations have decided that comprehensive management procedures are not feasible, practical or desirable at the present time. The recommendations herein distinguish between wireless technology controlled by the facility and used by doctors and staff for healthcare-specific communication and health informatics transport versus non-controlled (personal) mobile wireless equipment randomly brought into the facility by visitors, patients or the healthcare organization workforce.”

http://medicalconnectivity.com/2007/04/11.html

A Rationale for a Biologically-based Public Exposure Standard December 7, 2007

Posted by healthyself in "Cellular" Relay Antennas, Cell phone safety, Cell phone towers, Cell Phone Transmissions, Cell Phones, Cellular Damage, Cellular Destruction, cellular functions, Children's health, Chronic Fatigue, Chronic Illness, Computer Rooms, Cordless Phones, Cytotoxic Effects, Dangerous, Data, Denial of Risk, Depression, Diseases, EEG, EHF, Electric Field, Electrical Components, Electrical Pulses, Electrical Surges, Electrical Wiring, Electricity, Electrochemical, Electrochemical Communications, Electromagetic pollution, electromagnetic, Electromagnetic Communications, Electromagnetic Interference, Electromagnetic pollution, Electromagnetic Radiation, Electromagnetic waves, Electrophysiology, Electrosensitivity, Electrosmog, ELF, Emergency Medicine, EMF Exposure, EMF Research, EMF's, EMF-induced effects, EMR, Environment, Frequencies, Global Health Disaster, Handheld Units, Hazard, Health and Safety Officer, Health related, Health Risks, Health warnings, Heavy Metals, Hospitals, HOuseholds, Human Populations, Human Resources, Immune system, Internet, Lifestyle, Lifetime, Long Term Health Effects, Magnetic Field Exposure, Men's Health, Metabolic Changes, Microwave exposure, Migraines, mobile telephones, Neural Electrophysiology, Pain Perception, Penetration, Pulsed Radiation, Pulses, Radio Frequency Microwaves, Rapidly pulsing, Recommendations, Research, Research Needed, Resonant Frequency, Risk Factor, Risk of Disease, Sleep Disorders, Sleep disturbances, Stress, Switched On, Transmitter Towers, Who is Affected?, WiFi, Wireless, Wireless Phones, Women's Health.
1 comment so far

                                                                                                  BioInitiative Report:

A Rationale for a Biologically-based Public Exposure Standard
for Electromagnetic Fields (ELF and RF)


Each of the links below opens a PDF file in a new browser window. When done with a particluar file, closing the window will bring you back to this page.

August 31, 2007 UPDATE: This site was officially launched 8/31 at 1 a.m. EDT. If you downloaded, saved and/or printed any of the report files prior to this, please refer to all updated files after this launch date and time.

September 18, 2007BioInitiative Report / Complete – We have had requests for a copy of the Report in a single file format. Please note that the pagination in this single format retains the distinct section pagination used in each separate Section below and will print accordingly.

SECTION i.  Preface

SECTION ii: Table of Contents

SECTION 1: Summary for the Public (Conclusions, Table 1-1)
Ms. Sage

SECTION 2: Statement of the Problem
Ms. Sage

SECTION 3: The Existing Public Exposure Standards
Ms. Sage

SECTION 4: Evidence for Inadequacy of the Standards
Ms. Sage

SECTION 5: Evidence for Effects on Gene and Protein Expression (Transcriptomic and Proteomic Research)
Dr. Xu and Dr. Chen

SECTION 6: Evidence for Genotoxic Effects – RFR and ELF DNA Damage
Dr. Lai

SECTION 7: Evidence for Stress Response (Stress Proteins)
Dr. Blank

SECTION 8: Evidence for Effects on Immune Function
Dr. Johansson

SECTION 9: Evidence for Effects on Neurology and Behavior
Dr. Lai

SECTION 10: Evidence for Brain Tumors and Acoustic Neuromas
Dr. Hardell, Dr.Mild and Dr. Kundi

SECTION 11: Evidence for Childhood Cancers (Leukemia)
Dr. Kundi

SECTION 12: Magnetic Field Exposure: Melatonin Production; Alzheimer’s Disease; Breast Cancer
Dr. Davanipour and Dr. Sobel

SECTION 13: Evidence for Breast Cancer Promotion (Melatonin links in laboratory and cell studies)
Ms. Sage

SECTION 14: Evidence for Disruption by the Modulating Signal
Dr. Blackman

SECTION 15: Evidence Based on EMF Medical Therapeutics
Ms. Sage

SECTION 16: The Precautionary Principle
Mr. Gee

SECTION 17: Key Scientific Evidence and Public Health Policy Recommendations
Dr. Carpenter and Ms. Sage

SECTION 18: List of Participants and Affiliations

SECTION 19: Glossary of Terms and Abbreviations

SECTION 20: APPENDIX – Ambient ELF and RF levels
Average residential and occupational exposures

SECTION 21: Acknowledgements
http://www.bioinitiative.org/report/index.htm

Electromagnetic Forces Are Making Women Fat! December 3, 2007

Posted by healthyself in Biological Activity, Biological Effects, Biologically Signficant, Blogroll, Blood Sugar, Cell changes, cell membrane, Cell Phone Pulses, Cell phone safety, Cellular Damage, Cellular Phone Frequencies, Chronic Exhaustion, Chronic Fatigue, Chronic Illness, Cordless Phones, Cytotoxic Effects, Danger, Denial of Risk, Diabetes, Digestion, Edginess, electromagnetic, Electromagnetic Forces, Electromagnetic Interference, Electromagnetic pollution, Electromagnetic Radiation, Electromagnetic Signals, Electromagnetic waves, Electrosensitivity, Electrosmog, ELF, EMF Exposure, EMF's, EMF-induced effects, Entrainment, Environment, genetic damage, Hand Portables, Handheld Units, Handsets, headaches, Health and Wellness Products, Health related, Health Risks, Health warnings, Heavy Metals, HOuseholds, Human Populations, Inner Agitation, Lack of Concentration, Laptops, Leakage, LF, Lifestyle, Long Term Health Effects, Long Term Health Risks, Men's Health, Metabolic Changes, Metabolism, microchips, Microwave exposure, microwaves, Migraines, Minerals, Mobile Phone Transmissions, mobile telephones, Mobius Coil, Panic Attacks, Penetration, Pregnant Women, Public, Radio Frequency Microwaves, Radio Frequency Radiation, Radio Waves, Research, Research Needed, Safe Levels, Safety, Safety Barrier, SAR, sensations, signaling enzymes, signaling systems, Skull, Sleep, Sleep Disorders, Sleep disturbances, Solutions, Stress, Toxic Interactions, Who is Affected?, WiFi, Wireless Phones, Wireless Transmitter, Women's Health, Workplace.
1 comment so far

Growing research reveals that electromagnetic emissions from cell phones, computers and other modern-day gadgets can hinder the body’s weight-regulating mechanisms…..” Researchers worldwide are discovering an unwanted side effect of modern-day conveniences like cell phones, computers, microwaves, TVs, power lines and wireless network: The electromagnetic fields (EMFs) they emit are creating an “electromagnetic smog” called electropollution that’s making women sick—and fat!

“Despite the fact that electropollution has been largely ignored in the United States, research indicates that roughly 35 percent of people in developed countries suffer from a chronic sensitivity to electromagnetic waves, which causes unwanted health effects like fat retention, extreme fatigue, insomnia and depression.”

“The concern is so strong that laws are being put into place in several European countries to limit or ban the use of cell phones among children under age 16 and pregnant women. “For years we’ve heard the ongoing debate about whether or not EMFs raise cancer risk,” … “Though the jury is still out on that, experts worldwide agree that EMFs can damage health in other ways.”

How electropollution hurts

Each of our body’s cells contain special structures called microtubules that are able to sense invisible frequencies like EMFs. “These receptors interpret EMFs from sources like cell phones, wireless towers and even hair dryers as something foreign and dangerous, triggering cell membranes to instantly go into a protective ‘lockdown mode’,” …”What’s more, the constant bombardment from EMFs that most women in this country experience means that the cells stay blocked off indefinitely. “This extended lockdown hinders the vital cell-to-cell communication that underlies all of the body’s functions, including maintaining energy and natural slimming mechanisms like detoxing, balancing blood sugar and regulating appetite,” …”The result: chronic tiredness and stubborn extra weight.”

THE LITTLE CHIP THAT KEEPS YOU SAFE FROM CELL-PHONE AND COMPUTER EMFS

“International research has established that cell phones emit radiation that directly impacts the brain and triggers headaches, tiredness, swelling and more. And even a short call can lead to ill effects: Scientists have found that it takes the body approximately 30 minutes to recover from the harmful effects of being exposed to cell-phone EMFs for just 5 minutes….scientists have developed special chips that reduce the effects of EMF emissions by creating positive frequencies that counteract, or harmonize with, the negative frequencies.

http://mybiopro.com/ericlaurence

THREE MORE EASY EMP-PROTECTIVE STATEGIES

“1. Step away from the microwave—Microwave ovens are a major source of electropollution, but simply leaving the kitchen when nuking greatly cuts exposure.

2. Keep your phone at least 5 feet from the bed—Cordless phones are a source of EMFs as well, and nighttime exposure can really add up. Also key: Be sure the computer in your bedroom is turned off before you go to be and that any bedroom TV is at least 10 feet away from your bed.

3. Trade in that electric blanket for a comforter—Electric blankets are a well-documented EMF source—one that most experts recommend avoiding altogether.”

First for Women Magazine – 10/1/2007, The Happy Healthy Sexy You” Column

Laptop Radio-video August 28, 2007

Posted by healthyself in 1000 mG, 6000 microwaves, airports, Amplified Signals, Blogroll, Cancer, Cell Phone Transmissions, Cell Phones, Cellular Phone Frequencies, Computer Rooms, Cordless Phones, Danger, Dangerous, Decision Making, Electrochemical Communications, Electromagetic pollution, Electromagnetic Communications, Electromagnetic Field, Electromagnetic pollution, Electromagnetic Radiation, Electromagnetic Signals, Electromagnetic waves, Electrosmog, ELF, EMF Exposure, EMF Research, EMF Shielding, EMF's, EMF-induced effects, EMR, EMR meter, Environment, Financial Considerations, Health related, Health Risks, High Frequencies, HOuseholds, HRD, Laptops, Lifestyle, Maximum Output Level, Microwave exposure, microwaves, Mobile Phone Transmissions, Penetration, Radio Transmitters, Radios, Research Needed, Risk Factor, Risk of Disease, Safe Levels, School administrators, School Boards, Schools, WiFi, Wired, Wired Phone, Wireless, Wireless Phones, Wireless Revolution.
1 comment so far

Please go to this site to learn about the radiation coming from laptops.

http://alternativecomplementarymedicine.com/article.php/LaptopRadioFrequencyRadiationTestVI

Do Not Put Your Laptop in Your Lap-video August 28, 2007

Posted by healthyself in AC Magnetic Field, Amplified Signals, Blogroll, Computer Rooms, Danger, Dangerous, Decision Making, Electric Field, Electrical Components, Electrical Pulses, Electrical Surges, electromagnetic, Electromagnetic Field, Electromagnetic pollution, Electromagnetic Radiation, Electromagnetic waves, Electrosensitivity, EMF Exposure, EMF Research, EMF Shielding, EMF's, EMF-induced effects, Emissions, Environment, Frequencies, HOuseholds, Laptops, Lifestyle, Long Term Health Risks, Research Needed, Safety, Safety Barrier, Shielding, Switched On, Unsafe.
add a comment

Please go to this site:

http://alternativecomplementarymedicine.com/article.php/20070818165419735

Universal chips to protect yourself from your laptop are available.

http://www.mybiopro.com/vibrantenergy

Please click on subjects on the right for more information about the effects of electromagnetic frequencies on the human body.

Microwaves Leak–dramatic video August 28, 2007

Posted by healthyself in Amplified Signals, Blogroll, Danger, Dangerous, Decision Making, Denial of Risk, Electrical Pulses, Electrical Surges, electromagnetic, Electromagnetic pollution, Electromagnetic Radiation, Electromagnetic waves, EMF Exposure, EMF's, Emissions, Environment, Exposure, Health related, Health warnings, High Frequencies, HOuseholds, Leakage, Lifestyle, Risk of Disease, Shielding, transmission, Unsafe.
add a comment

http://alternativecomplementarymedicine.com/article.php/MicrowaveOverRadiation-LeakageTest

If you must use a microwave, you can purchase chips to put on it to reduce the effect.

http://www.mybiopro.com/vibrantenergy

Click on the right side of this blog to learn more about some of the potential effects of electromagnetic frequencies at various ranges.

EMF’ May 10, 2007

Posted by healthyself in "Cellular" Relay Antennas, Bioeffects, Biological Effects, Blogroll, Cars, Cell Masts, Cell Phone Pulses, Cell phone safety, Cell Phone Transmissions, Cell Phones, Children's health, Conversations, Cordless Phones, Decision Making, Electrical Pulses, Electrical Surges, Electromagnetic Communications, Electromagnetic Field, Electromagnetic Interference, Electromagnetic pollution, Electromagnetic Radiation, Electromagnetic waves, Electrosensitivity, Electrosmog, ELF, EMF Exposure, EMF Research, EMF Shielding, EMF's, EMF-induced effects, EMI, EMR, Environment, Exposure, FCC, Federal Communication Commission, Frequencies, Government's role, Hand Portables, Handheld Units, Health, Health related, Health Risks, High Frequencies, High Voltage Power Line, high voltage transmission lines, Human Populations, Hybrids, Internet, Legal Issues, Lifestyle, Long Term Health Effects, Long Term Health Risks, Magnetic Field Exposure, masts, Medicine, Men's Health, Metal Roofs, Microwave exposure, Microwave Ovens, microwaves, Mobile Phone Transmissions, mobile telephones, Monitoring Authorities, Penetration, Power Densities, Power poles, Prolonged calls, Public, Public Policy, Radio Frequency Microwaves, Radio Frequency Radiation, Radio Transmitters, Radio Waves, Research Needed, Risk Factor, Risk of Disease, Rooflines, Safe Levels, SAR, Stress, Wireless Phones, Wireless Revolution, Women's Health.
add a comment

“Does my hybrid have elevated electromagnetic fields? If so, will they hurt my family or me?”

“To date, neither an exhaustive web search nor the services of a crack librarian …have been able to unearth precise measurements of electromagnetic fields, or EMF, in hybrids. What you do with this knowledge, or lack thereof, depends largely upon your personality. Currently, the public can only be sure that the electronics contained in the vehicles meet FCC standards for electromagnetic interference (EMI) with other electronic devices.”
“EMFs come from power lines, televisions, microwave ovens, and (hybrid and conventional) cars.”

http://www.hybridcars.com/safety/electromagnetic-fields-in-hybrids.html

Guidelines That Were Ignored May 2, 2007

Posted by healthyself in "Cellular" Relay Antennas, Absorption, beam, Bioeffects, Biological Activity, Biological Effects, Blogroll, Cell Phone Transmissions, Cell Phones, Cellular Phone Frequencies, Children, Children's health, Customers, Electromagetic pollution, Electromagnetic Communications, Electromagnetic Radiation, Electromagnetic Signals, Electromagnetic waves, Electrosensitivity, Electrosmog, ELF, EMF Exposure, EMF Research, EMF Shielding, EMF's, EMF-induced effects, EMR, Government's role, Guidelines, Hand Portables, Handheld Units, Handsets, Health, Health related, Health Risks, Health warnings, Implement, Intensity, Kids, masts, Mobile Phone Transmissions, mobile telephones, Parenting, Publicizing, radiation, Recommendations, Risk of Cancer, Risk of Disease, Teenagers, Tweenies.
add a comment

“The first Stewart Report, published in May 2000, produced a series of sensible recommendations. They included: discouraging children from using mobiles, and stopping the industry from promoting them to the young; publicising the radiation levels of different handsets so that customers could choose the lowest; making the erection of phone masts subject to democratic control through the planning system; and stopping the building of masts where the radiation “beam of greatest intensity” fell on schools, unless the school and parents agreed.””The Government accepted most of these recommendations, but then… failed to implement them. Probably, it has lost any chance to curb the use of mobiles by children and teenagers. Since the first report, mobile use by the young has doubled.”

http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/health_medical/article2472140.ece