jump to navigation

Radiation Network November 30, 2011

Posted by healthyself in Cell phone safety.
Tags:
add a comment

It appears that some people are reacting to Fukushima. You might want to check these sites.

http://radiationnetwork.com/

Find where the antennas and towers are near your home or office November 22, 2011

Posted by healthyself in Antennas, Cell phone safety, Cell phone towers, Towers.
add a comment

http://www.antennasearch.com/

Cell Phones Do Cause Brain Tumors October 28, 2011

Posted by healthyself in airplane mode, Auditory Nerve, Bluetooth, Brain, Brain Cancer, Cancer, Cell phone safety, Children, Children's health, Energy, Glioma, Heavy Use, non-ionizing radiation, Parotid Gland, Sperm Counts, Text, Tumors.
Tags: , , , , , , ,
2 comments

Cell Phones Do Cause Brain Tumors
Magda Havas, PhD, Cell Phones Do Cause Brain Tumors
Trent University, September 15, 2011

“About nine out of 10 US households now have at least one cell phone — and that doesn’t include other wireless devices, such as cordless phones, iPads, baby monitors and computers.”

“Result: The average adult (and child) is flooded with nonionizing radiation, a form of energy that — for the first time — has been officially linked to ­cancer. In May, a panel of the World Health Organization (WHO) listed cell phones as a class 2b carcinogen, which means that it’s “possible” that cell phones, like some industrial chemicals, increase the risk for cancer.”

“This conclusion has been disputed by many scientists. But careful analysis of the best studies to date indicate that people who log the most cell-phone minutes are more likely to develop ­tumors on the same side of the head that they hold the cell phone, compared with those who use cell phones less often.”

Disturbing Research

“The largest study of cell-phone use, known as INTERPHONE, was conducted in 13 countries over a 10-year period. The study, published in International Journal of Epidemiology, found that people who used cell phones for at least 1,640 hours over the 10-year period — that comes to about 30 minutes a day — had a 40% higher risk of developing a glioma, a deadly type of brain tumor.”

“Disturbing: The development of a brain tumor to the point that it can be detected often takes 20 to 30 years. The fact that these tumors are showing up after 10 years of exposure is disturbing because it is much faster than expected.”

“Previous studies have linked frequent or prolonged cell-phone use to an increase in parotid (salivary gland) and auditory nerve tumors.”

“The actual risk probably is ­higher than the studies indicate. The INTERPHONE study defined “heavy use” as using a cell phone for about 30 minutes a day. That’s a fraction of the time that many people currently spend on their cell phones.”

“Also, the study looked only at adults, even though young people are frequent users of cell phones and the ones who face the highest cancer risks from decades of radiation exposure.”

“In addition, the study “diluted” the data by identifying people as regular cell-phone users who may have used their phones only once a week for at least six months. These light users were obviously exposed to far less radiation than heavy users. Including them in the study caused the cancer percentages to appear artificially low. For example, we would not expect someone who smoked one cigarette a week for at least six months to develop lung cancer.”

Safer Use

“Skeptics of cell-phone dangers argue that nonionizing radiation is too weak to heat tissues or break chemical bonds, factors that are known to increase cancer risks. But recent studies indicate damage to DNA in rat brains exposed to cell-phone radiation, and this type of damage can lead to cancer.”

Ways to stay safe…

“The fine print in cell-phone manuals usually advises users to hold the phone at least 7/8 of an inch away from the ear. Farther is better. Use speakerphone mode.”

“Wait for good reception. Cell phones emit much higher levels of radiation when the antenna is sending out signals to search for a tower or ­satellite. These signals can travel hundreds of miles — and the poorer the reception, the greater the radiation emitted by your cell phone.”

Use a hollow-tube headset. This is the safest type of headset because the last few inches, those closest to the ear, consist of a hollow tube. This hollow tube transmits sound like a stethoscope. Wired headsets need to be kept away from the body because the continuous wire that runs from the phone to the earpiece will expose you to some unnecessary radiation. Hollow-tube headsets can be purchased at www.Mercola.com or www.WaveShield.com/products.”

Use “airplane mode.” Even when you’re not talking on a cell phone, the phone is sending out signals every few minutes to search for the nearest tower. Turn off the phone when you’re not using it. Or switch it to airplane mode so that it can’t send or receive signals, but you still can use the phone to listen to music, watch videos and check your calendar.”

“Keep the phone on your desk when working. When the phone is switched on, don’t keep it in your pocket or attached to your belt. This is particularly important for men. Preliminary research indicates that men who keep their phones close to their bodies (often in holsters or pockets) have lower sperm counts and poorer sperm quality than those without this exposure. We do not know the effects on egg cells because they are more difficult to harvest.”

“Caution: The worst way to use a Bluetooth wireless headset is to place it on your ear with the cell phone in your pocket. This way, your head and lower body are both being irradiated. A better way to use a Bluetooth is to keep the cell phone on a table several feet away from all body parts and to periodically move the earpiece from one ear to the other to minimize one-side radiation exposure.”

Text instead of talk. There’s a burst of radiation when you send or receive a text message, but the intensity and duration of the radiation are lower than when you talk. Texting is a better alternative to talking on your cell phone, but keep the phone as far away from your body as possible. Normal clothing, including leather, will not reduce your exposure.”

Don’t use your phone in a car, train or bus. Using a cell phone inside a metal vehicle can increase levels of radiation due to reflection and the fact that your cell-phone signal has to be higher to exit the vehicle. The best practice is to keep the phone off or in airplane mode and to check it periodically for messages. Then return messages by text or use a landline phone later.”

http://www.bottomlinesecrets.com/article.html?article_id=100005078&l=2

Steps You Can Take to Protect Yourself and Your Family March 12, 2011

Posted by healthyself in "Cellular" Relay Antennas, Adolescents, Alarming, Amplified Signals, Antennas, Biological Effects, Biologically Signficant, Blogroll, Brain Cancer, Cell phone safety, Cell Phone Transmissions, Cell Phones, Cellular Damage, Childhood Cancer, Children, Children's health, Cordless Telephone Base Units, Danger, Dangerous, Denial of Risk, Electromagnetic Radiation, Electrosensitivity, Electrosmog meter, EMF Exposure, EMF Research, EMF-induced effects, Exposure, Health Deterioratrion, Health Risk, Health Risks, Human Populations, Kids, Landline, Lifestyle, Lifetime, Long Term Health Effects, Long Term Health Risks, Medical Research, radiation, RF Meters, Risk of Cancer, Risk of Disease, Smart Meter, Tweenies, Unsafe, Who is Affected?, Wireless Microphones, Wireless Phones, Wireless Revolution, Wireless router.
1 comment so far

“Unless you’re willing to give up your wireless conveniences, you need to at least make accommodations to minimize the inherent health risks to yourself and especially your children. Kids growing up today are exposed to an unprecedented amount of radiation and dirty electricity, and we already KNOW that some people simply cannot handle these levels of exposure.

It’s also only a matter of time before this generation of children reaches the age where health deterioration becomes evident. If it’s 30 years, then many of us older folk will die before the health effects become apparent. But 30 years for today’s children is another story—the health effects may hit them before they’ve even entered middle-age!

I also urge you to help spread awareness on this issue. People must be made aware. So please, help educate others, especially those in government responsible for setting exposure guidelines. We recommend you sign the EMF Petition to Congress and support local, national and international advocacy groups in this field.

Also, take as many of these proactive steps as you can to minimize your and your family’s exposure:

  1. Have your child avoid  wireless technology: Barring an emergency, children should not use a cell phone, or a wireless device of any type. Children are far more vulnerable to cell phone radiation than adults, because of their thinner skull bones. One alarming 2008 study indicated that that children and teenagers raise their risk of brain cancer by 500 percent if they use cell phones!
  2. Reduce your cell phone use: Turn your cell phone off more often. Reserve it for emergencies or important matters. As long as your cell phone is on, it emits radiation intermittently, even when you are not actually making a call.
  3. Use a land line at home and at work: Although more and more people are switching to using cell phones as their exclusive phone contact, it is a dangerous trend and you can choose to opt out of the madness.
  4. Reduce or eliminate your use of other wireless devices: You would be wise to cut down your use of wireless and electronic devices. Just as with cell phones, it is important to ask yourself whether or not you really need to use them, how often, and for how long. In your home it is usually a very simple matter to run multiple Ethernet cords to avoid the need for wireless internet and to replace wireless routers and wireless/hard-wire ‘combination’ routers with ‘wired-only routers’.
    Camilla Rees of ElectromagneticHealth.org cautions that in testing many homes she finds the ‘combination’ wireless/wired routers often still emit microwave radiation even if you have a hard-wired Ethernet cord plugged into it and believe you’re not using the wireless part of it! 

    “Sometimes when I visit people’s homes they are concerned because of a new Smart Meter, wondering if that is causing their symptoms, but commonly it turns out very high levels of radiation are coming from a ‘combination’ wired/wireless router, both store-bought routers or those provided by the utility. Naturally, this can be dumbfounding, as all along they assumed they were using a safe router and didn’t know that they were being continually exposed to radiation,” she says.

    “This is not to say that smart meters are not  a problem, but very basic home electronics issues need to be ruled out first and the only way to do that is by measuring with a meter.”

    As for portable phones, if you must use a portable home phone, use the older kind that operates at 900 MHz. They are no safer during calls, but at least many of them do not broadcast constantly even when no call is being made.

    Note that the only way to truly be sure if there is an exposure from your cordless phone is to measure with an electrosmog meter, and it must be one that goes up to the frequency of your portable phone (so old meters won’t help much). Many people buy a meter and go searching for older model portable phones at thrift stores, where there is no packaging and one can actually test the phone.

    As many portable phones are 5.8 Gigahertz, we recommend you look for RF meters that go up to 8 Gigahertz, the highest range now available in a meter suitable for consumers. You can find RF meters at www.emfsafetystore.com. But you can pretty much be sure your portable phone is a problem if the technology is DECT, or digitally enhanced cordless technology.

    Alternatively you can be very careful with the base station placement as that causes the bulk of the problem since it transmits signals 24/7, even when you aren’t talking. So if you can keep the base station at least three rooms away from where you spend most of your time, and especially your bedroom, they may not be as damaging to your health.

    Ideally it would be helpful to turn off your base station every night before you go to bed.

    Obviously, apartment living poses special problems, where you could conceivably be exposed to multiple portable phones and multiple wireless routers from multiple neighbors. In cases like this, not only is it important to minimize exposures from your own personal communications devices, but inevitably, you must learn about measuring/detecting and RF shielding or face the consequences of potentially excessive exposures.

  5. Use your cell phone only where reception is good: The weaker the reception, the more power your phone must use to transmit, and the more power it uses, the more heating it generates (SAR), and the deeper the dangerous radio waves penetrate into your body. Ideally, you should only use your phone with full bars and good reception.
    Also avoid carrying your phone on your body as that merely maximizes any potential exposure. Ideally put it in your purse or carrying bag. Placing a cell phone in a shirt pocket over the heart is asking for trouble, as is placing it in a man’s pocket if he seeks to preserve his fertility.
  6. Don’t assume one cell phone is safer than another.There’s no such thing as a “safe” cell phone. They all create biological effects, and a low SAR phone, depending on the angle with which you use it, or the duration of use, or the location of use, can be more damaging that a higher SAR phone. Consider all cell phones inappropriate in a truly health conscious lifestyle.
  7. Keep your cell phone away from your body when it’s on: The most dangerous place to be, in terms of radiation exposure, is within about six inches of the emitting antenna. You do not want any part of your body within that area.
  8. Respect others who are more sensitive: Some people who have become sensitive can feel the effects of others’ cell phones in the same room, even when it is on but not being used. If you are in a meeting, on public transportation, in a courtroom or other public places, such as a doctor’s office, keep your cell phone turned off out of consideration for the ‘second hand radiation’ effects. Children are also more vulnerable, so please avoid using your cell phone near children.
  9. Use safer headset technology: Wired headsets will certainly allow you to keep the cell phone farther away from your body. However, if a wired headset is not well-shielded — and most of them are not — the wire itself acts as an antenna attracting ambient information carrying radio waves and transmitting radiation directly to your brain.
    Make sure that the wire used to transmit the signal to your ear is shielded. The best kind of headset to use is a combination shielded wire and air-tube headset. These operate like a stethoscope, transmitting the information to your head as an actual sound wave; although there are wires that still must be shielded, there is no metal wire that goes all the way up to your head.”

http://emf.mercola.com/sites/emf/archive/2011/03/12/will-microwaves-kill-more-than-cigarettes-and-asbestos-combined.aspx

Disappearing Bees – Mystery Solved! February 1, 2011

Posted by healthyself in Bees, Cell phone safety, Death, Death Rates, Government's role.
Tags:
add a comment
 

Dear      

This report should have been published more than two years ago, but our governmental protection agencies have been covering it up for more than two years. Now that the true cause has been discovered, the question here is how long will they be allowed to continue to kill the remaining few bees before any legislation will go in to stop the action

 

Bee

Report: USDA also knew about bee-killing pesticide

www.naturalnews.com/031091_USDA_pesticide.html

Monday, January 24, 2011 by: Ethan A. Huff, staff writer

(NaturalNews) Neonicotinoids, a class of insecticides that attack insects’ central nervous systems, are increasingly being linked to killing off bees, bats and other pollinators that are essential for growing food. And a two-year-old report just now being released by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) adds to the growing body of evidence that these toxic insecticides are a serious threat to not only bees, but also to humans.

It is now widely known that neonicotinoids are a highly-dangerous neurotoxin that absorbs systemically into plants, meaning it makes its way throughout the entire plant, including into the pollen and nectar that bees eat. And these neurotoxins are also a threat to mammals, which includes humans.

Last month, a leaked document revealed that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) knowingly approved, and continued to allow approval for, neonicotinoids, despite the fact that they knew the chemicals killed bees. The agency even knew that Bayer CropScience, the purveyor of most of the neonicotinoids used today, had falsified safety data to get them approved in the first place www.naturalnews.com/030921_EPA_pesticides.html

And now it has been revealed that USDA scientists also knew about the dangers associated with neonicotinoids. So why did it take two years for the USDA report to see the light of day? Dr. Jeffrey Pettis and researchers from the U.S. government bee laboratory in Maryland, authors of the USDA study, did not provide an answer to this question. They did admit to the U.K. Independent, however, that their study “has been too long in getting out,” and that it would soon be published in a journal.

Bee Covered With Pollen

Pettis and his team found that neonicotinoids were directly responsible for increasing bees’ susceptibility to infectious diseases, even at levels so low that they are practically undetected. This fact alone debunks the myth perpetuated by Bayer and other neonicotinoid producers that the chemicals are safe when used “properly”, because there, in fact, seems to be no proper or safe level.

“This new research from America confirms that at very, very low concentrations, neonicotinoid chemicals can make a honeybee vulnerable to fatal disease,” said Matt Shardlow, director of the charity Buglife, to the Independent. “If these pesticides are causing large numbers of honeybees, bumblebees, solitary bees, hoverflies and moths to get sick and die from diseases they would otherwise have survived, then neonicotinoid chemicals could be the main cause of both colony collapse disorder and the loss of wild pollinator populations.”

“The weight of evidence against neonicotinoids is becoming irresistible — government should act now to ban the risky use of these toxins.”

http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/nature/exclusive-bees-facing-a-poisoned-spring-2189267.html

Check the safety of your cell phone–lower is better October 21, 2009

Posted by healthyself in Cell phone safety.
add a comment
Samsung Impression (SGH-a877) Yes AT&T 0.15 - 0.35 W/kg
Motorola RAZR V8 Yes CellularONE 0.36 W/kg
Samsung SGH-t229 Yes T-Mobile 0.38 W/kg
Samsung Rugby (SGH-a837) Yes AT&T 0.22 - 0.46 W/kg
Samsung Propel Pro (SGH-i627) Yes AT&T 0.14 - 0.47 W/kg
Samsung Gravity (SGH-t459) Yes CellularONE, T-Mobile 0.49 W/kg
T-Mobile Sidekick Yes T-Mobile 0.50 W/kg
LG Xenon (GR500) Yes AT&T 0.52 W/kg
Motorola Karma QA1 Yes AT&T 0.55 W/kg
Sanyo Katana II Yes Kajeet 0.22 - 0.55 W/kg
Motorola W260g Yes TracFone 0.57 W/kg
Blackberry Storm 9530 Yes Verizon Wireless 0.57 W/kg
Motorola Stature i9 Yes Boost Mobile, Sprint 0.61 W/kg
Samsung Magnet (SGH-A257) Yes AT&T 0.62 - 0.64 W/kg
Motorola Renegade V950 Yes Sprint 0.66 W/kg
LG CF360 Yes AT&T 0.68 W/kg
Samsung Saga (SCH-i770) Yes Verizon Wireless 0.69 W/kg
Helio Ocean Yes Virgin Mobile 0.72 W/kg
Sony Ericsson W518a Walkman Yes AT&T 0.73 W/kg
Samsung SCH-i760 Yes Verizon Wireless 0.73 W/kg
Samsung SGH-t339 Yes T-Mobile 0.73 W/kg
Samsung SGH-a137 Yes AT&T GoPhone, AT&T 0.20 - 0.76 W/kg
LG LX400 Yes Sprint 0.36 - 0.77 W/kg
LG Voyager (VX10000) Yes Verizon Wireless 0.77 W/kg
Samsung MyShot (SCH-r430) Yes Cricket, MetroPCS 0.78 W/kg
Samsung Exclaim (SPH-m550) Yes Sprint 0.29 - 0.78 W/kg
Samsung Access (SGH-a827) Yes AT&T 0.24 - 0.78 W/kg
Sanyo KATANA LX (SCP-3800) Yes Sprint, CREDO 0.53 - 0.78 W/kg
Motorola W175 Yes TracFone 0.79 W/kg
LG Rhythm (UX585) Yes U.S. Cellular 0.80 W/kg
Motorola MOTO W755 Yes Verizon Wireless 0.80 W/kg
Samsung SGH-t109 Yes T-Mobile 0.80 W/kg
Sony Ericsson W760a Yes AT&T 0.81 W/kg
Nokia 5610 Yes T-Mobile 0.81 W/kg
Samsung Eternity(SGH-a867) Yes AT&T 0.11 - 0.82 W/kg
Nokia 7510 Yes T-Mobile 0.84 W/kg
LG 225 Yes TracFone 0.85 W/kg
HTC Touch Diamond (DIAM400) Yes Verizon Wireless 0.85 W/kg
HTC Touch Diamond Yes Verizon Wireless 0.85 - 0.86 W/kg
HTC Touch Diamond (DIAM500) Yes Sprint, Alltel 0.86 W/kg
ZTE C79 Yes MetroPCS 0.87 W/kg
Nokia 6301 Yes T-Mobile 0.71 - 0.87 W/kg
Sony Ericsson W200a Yes CellularONE 0.87 W/kg
Samsung Slash (SPH-m310) Yes Virgin Mobile 0.87 W/kg
Samsung Gleam (SCH-u700) Yes Verizon Wireless 0.87 W/kg
LG CU405 Yes AT&T GoPhone 0.88 W/kg
Motorola Rapture VU30 Yes Verizon Wireless 0.88 W/kg
Sanyo Katana Yes Kajeet 0.68 - 0.88 W/kg
Motorola RAZR V3 Yes AT&T GoPhone, AT&T, T-Mobile 0.89 W/kg
T-Mobile Sidekick LX Yes T-Mobile 0.89 W/kg
LG Tritan (UX840) Yes U.S. Cellular 0.89 W/kg
HTC Touch PRO Yes Sprint, U.S. Cellular, Verizon Wireless, CREDO 0.91 W/kg
Sanyo KATANA Eclipse X Yes Sprint 0.60 - 0.91 W/kg
Palm Pre Yes Sprint, Verizon Wireless 0.92 W/kg
Samsung SGH-t439 Yes CellularONE, T-Mobile 0.92 W/kg
Nokia 6650 Yes AT&T 0.92 W/kg
Samsung Mantra Yes Virgin Mobile 0.93 W/kg
LG VX5500 Yes Verizon Wireless 0.95 W/kg
LG 600G Yes TracFone 0.96 W/kg
Samsung Renown (SCH-u810) Yes Verizon Wireless 0.96 W/kg
Nokia 6205 Yes Verizon Wireless 0.96 W/kg
Sony Ericsson Z310a Yes AT&T, AT&T GoPhone 0.96 W/kg
LG LX150 Yes Kajeet 0.76 - 0.96 W/kg
Samsung Propel (SGH-a767) Yes AT&T 0.26 - 0.97 W/kg
Samsung Behold (SGH-t919) Yes T-Mobile 0.99 W/kg
ZTE C78 Yes MetroPCS 0.99 W/kg
LG Neon Yes AT&T, CellularONE 1.00 W/kg
Samsung SGH-T101G Yes TracFone 1.00 W/kg
Nokia 6085 Yes AT&T, AT&T GoPhone 1.00 W/kg
Nokia 2600 Yes AT&T, AT&T GoPhone 1.00 W/kg
Samsung MyShot II Yes Cricket 1.00 W/kg
Blackberry Curve 8900 Yes AT&T, T-Mobile 1.01 W/kg
Nokia 3220 Yes CellularONE, T-Mobile 0.71 - 1.01 W/kg
Nokia 3600 Slide Yes CellularONE 1.01 W/kg
Samsung Rant (SPH-m540) Yes Sprint 0.70 - 1.01 W/kg
Motorola MOTOROKR E8 Yes CellularONE, T-Mobile 1.02 W/kg
Motorola i580 Yes Sprint 1.02 W/kg
Helio Ocean2 Yes Virgin Mobile 1.02 W/kg
Samsung Delve (SCH-r800) Yes U.S. Cellular, Alltel 0.80 - 1.04 W/kg
Samsung JACK (i637) Yes AT&T 0.42 - 1.04 W/kg
Samsung JetSet (SCH-r550) Yes Cricket 1.05 W/kg
Samsung Byline (SCH-r310) Yes MetroPCS 0.63 - 1.05 W/kg
Samsung SGH-T349 Yes T-Mobile 1.05 W/kg
Nokia 1680 Yes T-Mobile 1.06 W/kg
Samsung SCH-R311 Yes U.S. Cellular 1.06 W/kg
Samsung SCH-u430 Yes Verizon Wireless 1.07 W/kg
Nokia 7205 Intrigue Yes Verizon Wireless 1.08 W/kg
Motorola Hint QA30 Yes Cricket, U.S. Cellular, MetroPCS 1.08 W/kg
Samsung Glyde (SCH-u940) Yes Verizon Wireless 1.08 W/kg
Motorola W490 Yes CellularONE, T-Mobile 1.08 W/kg
Samsung SPH-m220 Yes Sprint, CREDO 0.75 - 1.08 W/kg
Blackberry Curve 8320 Yes AT&T 1.08 W/kg
Motorola i365 Yes Sprint 1.09 W/kg
Samsung SPH-m300 Yes Kajeet, CREDO, Sprint 0.79 - 1.09 W/kg
Blackberry Curve 8310 Yes AT&T 1.09 W/kg
Samsung Smooth (SCH-u350) Yes Verizon Wireless 1.09 W/kg
LG Dare (VX9700) Yes Verizon Wireless 1.09 W/kg
Blackberry Curve 8350i Yes Sprint 1.10 W/kg
Nokia 2610 Yes AT&T GoPhone, CellularONE, T-Mobile, AT&T 1.10 W/kg
Nokia 2760 Yes CellularONE, T-Mobile 0.74 - 1.10 W/kg
UTStarcom GTX75 (aka AT&T Quickfire) Yes AT&T 0.36 - 1.10 W/kg
T-Mobile G1 with Google Yes T-Mobile 1.11 W/kg
Samsung SPH-M320 Yes Sprint, CREDO 0.81 - 1.11 W/kg
Samsung SGH-a437 Yes AT&T GoPhone, AT&T 0.72 - 1.11 W/kg
Samsung Step (SCH-r470 Two) Yes U.S. Cellular 1.00 - 1.11 W/kg
Nokia 2605 Mirage Yes Verizon Wireless 1.12 W/kg
UTStarcom CDM7126 Yes Cricket, MetroPCS 1.13 W/kg
Motorola Evoke QA4 Yes Cricket 1.13 W/kg
LG 3280 Yes TracFone 1.13 W/kg
HTC Fuze (RAPH110) Yes AT&T 1.13 W/kg
HTC Fuze Yes AT&T 1.13 W/kg
Samsung Knack (SCH-u310) Yes Verizon Wireless 1.14 W/kg
Samsung SGH-a237 Yes AT&T, AT&T GoPhone 1.07 - 1.14 W/kg
LG VX8360 Yes Verizon Wireless 1.14 W/kg
LG Lotus (LX600) Yes Sprint 0.90 - 1.15 W/kg
Blackberry Pearl Flip 8220 Yes T-Mobile 1.15 W/kg
Motorola Krave ZN4 Yes Verizon Wireless 1.16 W/kg
Samsung Tint (SCH-R420 Yes MetroPCS 0.68 - 1.17 W/kg
Motorola Clutch i465 Yes Boost Mobile, Sprint 1.17 W/kg
LG CP150 Yes AT&T GoPhone 1.18 W/kg
LG 410G Yes TracFone 1.18 W/kg
LG LX160 Yes Kajeet, Sprint 1.19 W/kg
Apple iPhone 3G S Yes AT&T 0.52 - 1.19 W/kg
Samsung SGH-t819 Yes T-Mobile 1.19 W/kg
Samsung BlackJack II (SGH-i617) Yes AT&T 0.61 - 1.20 W/kg
Samsung SCH-U440 Yes U.S. Cellular 1.13 - 1.21 W/kg
Sanyo PRO-200 Yes Sprint 0.41 - 1.21 W/kg
Samsung Finesse (SCH-r810) Yes MetroPCS 1.22 W/kg
LG CE110 Yes AT&T, AT&T GoPhone 1.22 W/kg
Motorola MOTOACTV W450 Yes T-Mobile 1.23 W/kg
Motorola MOTORAKR Z6m Yes MetroPCS 1.23 W/kg
Samsung Solstice (SGH-A877) Yes AT&T 0.67 - 1.23 W/kg
Sony Ericsson C905a Cyber-shot Yes AT&T, CellularONE 0.67 - 1.23 W/kg
Motorola The Buzz ic502 Yes Sprint 1.24 W/kg
Blackberry Pearl 8110 Yes AT&T 1.24 W/kg
Samsung SGH-t219 Yes T-Mobile 1.24 W/kg
Sanyo PRO-700 Yes Sprint 0.54 - 1.24 W/kg
Nokia 5310 Yes T-Mobile 1.11 - 1.25 W/kg
Nokia 5310 Xpress Music Yes CellularONE 1.25 W/kg
Sanyo SCP-2700 Yes Sprint, CREDO 1.16 - 1.25 W/kg
Motorola RAZR V3i Yes CellularONE, AT&T, T-Mobile 1.26 W/kg
Samsung SCH-r211 Yes Cricket 1.26 W/kg
LG VU (CU915) Yes AT&T 1.26 W/kg
LG Chocolate 3 (VX8560) Yes Verizon Wireless 1.26 W/kg
Helio Fin Yes Virgin Mobile 0.53 - 1.27 W/kg
Nokia 3606 Yes Cricket 1.27 W/kg
Samsung Sway (SCH-u650) Yes Verizon Wireless 1.28 W/kg
Blackberry 8820 Yes AT&T, T-Mobile, Verizon Wireless 1.28 W/kg
LG enV Touch (VX11000,Voyager 2) Yes Verizon Wireless 1.28 W/kg
Samsung SGH-a637 Yes AT&T 0.45 - 1.28 W/kg
Samsung SGH-a737 Yes AT&T 0.43 - 1.28 W/kg
Nokia 5800 XpressMusic Yes CellularONE 1.29 W/kg
Motorola Moto Q Global Yes AT&T 1.29 W/kg
Verizon Wireless CDM8975PTT Yes Verizon Wireless 1.30 W/kg
LG INCITE (CT810) Yes AT&T 1.30 W/kg
Samsung Epix (SGH-i907) Yes AT&T 0.52 - 1.30 W/kg
LG LX290 Yes Sprint 1.04 - 1.30 W/kg
Motorola i880 Yes Sprint 1.30 W/kg
LG 200C Yes TracFone 1.30 W/kg
Motorola MOTO Q 9m Yes Verizon Wireless 1.30 W/kg
Cricket TXTM8 Yes Cricket 1.30 W/kg
Verizon Wireless CDM8975 Yes Verizon Wireless 1.30 W/kg
Samsung SCH-u410 Yes Verizon Wireless 1.31 W/kg
LG enV 3 (VX9200) Yes Verizon Wireless 1.31 W/kg
Samsung Juke (SCH-u470) Yes Verizon Wireless 1.31 W/kg
Nokia Surge 6790 Yes AT&T 1.31 W/kg
Samsung Omnia (SCH-i910) Yes Verizon Wireless 1.31 W/kg
Motorola W376g Yes TracFone 1.32 W/kg
Motorola Tundra VA76r Yes AT&T 1.32 W/kg
Samsung Instinct s30 Yes Sprint 1.05 - 1.33 W/kg
Nokia 6555 Yes AT&T 0.93 - 1.33 W/kg
Motorola V176 Yes TracFone 1.33 W/kg
Motorola MOTORAZR VE20 Yes Sprint, U.S. Cellular 1.34 W/kg
LG Invision (CB630) Yes AT&T 1.34 W/kg
Samsung Trance (SCH-u490) Yes Verizon Wireless 1.34 W/kg
Samsung SCH-u540 Yes Verizon Wireless 1.34 W/kg
Verizon Wireless G’zOne Type S Yes Verizon Wireless 1.34 W/kg
Verizon Wireless G’zOne Type S PTT Yes Verizon Wireless 1.34 W/kg
LG enV 2 (VX9100) Yes Verizon Wireless 1.34 W/kg
Motorola MotoEM330 Yes AT&T 1.35 W/kg
Palm Centro Yes AT&T, CellularONE, Sprint, Verizon Wireless 1.09 - 1.35 W/kg
Samsung SPH-z400 Yes Sprint 0.72 - 1.36 W/kg
Motorola MOTOROKR U9 Yes CellularONE 1.36 W/kg
LG LX370 Yes Sprint 0.90 - 1.36 W/kg
Samsung ACE (SPH-i325) Yes Sprint 1.00 - 1.36 W/kg
Motorola C261 Yes TracFone 1.38 W/kg
LG Versa (VX9600) Yes Verizon Wireless 1.38 W/kg
Verizon Wireless CDM8950 Yes Verizon Wireless 1.38 W/kg
Nokia 1606 Yes Cricket, MetroPCS 1.38 W/kg
Samsung SCH-u340 Yes Cricket, U.S. Cellular, Verizon Wireless 1.38 W/kg
Apple iPhone 3G Yes AT&T 0.24 - 1.39 W/kg
Samsung SCH-u550 Yes Verizon Wireless 1.39 W/kg
Helio Mysto Yes Virgin Mobile 1.21 - 1.39 W/kg
Motorola W370 Yes TracFone 1.40 W/kg
Samsung FlipShot (SCH-u900) Yes Verizon Wireless 1.40 W/kg
Motorola RAZR V3s Yes MetroPCS 1.40 W/kg
Nokia E71 Yes CellularONE 1.23 - 1.40 W/kg
Palm Treo PRO (T850EWW) Yes Sprint 1.40 W/kg
Nokia E71x Yes AT&T 1.41 W/kg
Sony Ericsson Z750a Yes AT&T 1.42 W/kg
Samsung Messager, Mister Cartoon (SCH-r450) Yes Cricket, MetroPCS 1.42 W/kg
Motorola C139 Yes TracFone 1.43 W/kg
Blackberry 8703e Yes Verizon Wireless 1.44 W/kg
Samsung Highnote (SPH-m630) Yes Sprint 0.74 - 1.45 W/kg
Motorola i576 Yes Sprint 1.45 W/kg
Motorola i776 Yes Sprint 1.45 W/kg
Motorola Adventure V750 Yes Verizon Wireless 1.45 W/kg
Motorola Boost i776 Yes Boost Mobile 1.45 W/kg
Samsung SGH-a777 Yes AT&T 0.63 - 1.46 W/kg
Samsung Instinct (SPH-m800) Yes Sprint 1.16 - 1.46 W/kg
Firefly GlowPhone Yes CellularONE 1.46 W/kg
Samsung Spex (SCH-r210) Yes Cricket, U.S. Cellular 1.46 W/kg
Blackberry 8700g Yes T-Mobile 1.46 W/kg
Kyocera Neo E1100 Yes U.S. Cellular, MetroPCS 1.46 W/kg
Helio Heat Yes Virgin Mobile 0.85 - 1.46 W/kg
Sony Ericsson TM506 Yes T-Mobile 1.46 W/kg
Blackberry 8830 World Edition Yes U.S. Cellular, Verizon Wireless, Sprint 1.46 W/kg
Blackberry Pearl 8120 Yes T-Mobile, AT&T 1.48 W/kg
Sanyo S1 Yes Sprint 1.46 - 1.48 W/kg
Blackberry Pearl 8130 Yes Sprint, U.S. Cellular, Verizon Wireless 1.48 W/kg
Motorola MOTOSLVR L9 Yes CellularONE 1.48 W/kg
HTC SMT 5800 Yes Verizon Wireless 1.49 W/kg
Kyocera Melo S1300 Yes MetroPCS 1.11 - 1.50 W/kg
Kyocera S1300 Yes Cricket 1.11 - 1.50 W/kg
Nokia 1006 Yes MetroPCS 1.50 W/kg
Motorola V365 Yes AT&T 1.51 W/kg
Blackberry Curve 8300 Yes T-Mobile, AT&T 1.51 W/kg
Blackberry Bold 9000 Yes AT&T 1.51 W/kg
LG Rumor2 (LX265) Yes Sprint 1.04 - 1.51 W/kg
Motorola MOTO VE240 Yes Cricket, MetroPCS 1.52 W/kg
Motorola i335 Yes Sprint 1.53 W/kg
Motorola C290 Yes Kajeet, Sprint 1.53 W/kg
T-Mobile Shadow Yes T-Mobile 1.53 W/kg
Blackberry Curve 8330 Yes Sprint, U.S. Cellular, Verizon Wireless, MetroPCS, CREDO 1.54 W/kg
Motorola W385 Yes U.S. Cellular, Verizon Wireless 1.54 W/kg
Motorola MOTO VU204 Yes Verizon Wireless 1.55 W/kg
Kyocera Jax S1300 Yes Virgin Mobile 1.55 W/kg
T-Mobile myTouch 3G Yes T-Mobile 1.55 W/kg
Kyocera K132 Yes Cricket N/A
Kyocera TNT! S2400 Yes Virgin Mobile N/A
Cricket EZ Yes Cricket N/A
HTC Touch Yes CellularONE N/A
Motorola Boost i776w Yes Boost Mobile N/A
Blackberry Tour 9630 Smartphone Yes Sprint N/A
Motorola W315 Yes Verizon Wireless N/A
Pantech C630 Yes AT&T N/A
Kyocera Marbl K127 Yes Virgin Mobile N/A
LG Wine (UX280) Yes U.S. Cellular N/A
Motorola Multimedia RAZR Yes Verizon Wireless N/A
Pantech Matrix Pro Yes AT&T N/A
LG Shine (CU720) Yes AT&T N/A
HTC Touch Diamond XV6950 Yes Verizon Wireless N/A
Motorola Q9 Yes CellularONE N/A
Kyocera K126C Yes TracFone N/A
Blackberry Pearl Flip 8230 Yes U.S. Cellular N/A
Pantech Matrix Yes AT&T N/A
Motorola RAZR Yes Verizon Wireless N/A
Sierra Wireless 598U Yes Sprint N/A
Pantech C610 Yes AT&T N/A
Kyocera X-tc M2000 Yes Virgin Mobile N/A
LG Rumor Yes Kajeet N/A
Motorola MOTO Q 9c Yes CREDO, Sprint N/A
Sony z555a Yes CellularONE N/A
Pantech Breeze Yes AT&T N/A
Pantech Slate (C530) Yes AT&T, AT&T GoPhone N/A
HTC Touch (ELF0100) Yes CellularONE, U.S. Cellular N/A
Motorola Boost i290 Yes Boost Mobile N/A
HTC Snap Yes Sprint N/A
Motorola i920 Yes Sprint N/A
Motorola Renew W233 Yes T-Mobile N/A
Sony Ericsson F305 Yes CellularONE N/A
LG Flare (LX165) Yes Virgin Mobile N/A
Blackberry Curve 8830 Yes Sprint N/A
Motorola Boost i335 Yes Boost Mobile N/A
Motorola KRZR Yes CellularONE N/A
Motorola V170 Yes TracFone N/A
Sony Ericsson W350 Yes AT&T, AT&T GoPhone N/A
Kyocera Mako S4000 Yes MetroPCS N/A
Cricket A100 Yes Cricket N/A
Motorola V195s Yes T-Mobile N/A
Samsung t636 Yes CellularONE N/A
Verizon Wireless G’zOne Boulder Yes Verizon Wireless N/A
Verizon Wireless Blitz Yes Verizon Wireless N/A
Verizon Wireless XV6900 Yes Verizon Wireless N/A
UTStarcom Shuttle Yes Virgin Mobile N/A
UTStarcom Arc Yes Virgin Mobile N/A
Palm Treo 755p Yes Sprint N/A
Samsung Impression (SGH-a877) Yes AT&T 0.15 - 0.35 W/kg
Motorola RAZR V8 Yes CellularONE 0.36 W/kg
Samsung SGH-t229 Yes T-Mobile 0.38 W/kg
Samsung Rugby (SGH-a837) Yes AT&T 0.22 - 0.46 W/kg
Samsung Propel Pro (SGH-i627) Yes AT&T 0.14 - 0.47 W/kg
Samsung Gravity (SGH-t459) Yes CellularONE, T-Mobile 0.49 W/kg
T-Mobile Sidekick Yes T-Mobile 0.50 W/kg
LG Xenon (GR500) Yes AT&T 0.52 W/kg
Motorola Karma QA1 Yes AT&T 0.55 W/kg
Sanyo Katana II Yes Kajeet 0.22 - 0.55 W/kg
Motorola W260g Yes TracFone 0.57 W/kg
Blackberry Storm 9530 Yes Verizon Wireless 0.57 W/kg
Motorola Stature i9 Yes Boost Mobile, Sprint 0.61 W/kg
Samsung Magnet (SGH-A257) Yes AT&T 0.62 - 0.64 W/kg
Motorola Renegade V950 Yes Sprint 0.66 W/kg
LG CF360 Yes AT&T 0.68 W/kg
Samsung Saga (SCH-i770) Yes Verizon Wireless 0.69 W/kg
Helio Ocean Yes Virgin Mobile 0.72 W/kg
Sony Ericsson W518a Walkman Yes AT&T 0.73 W/kg
Samsung SCH-i760 Yes Verizon Wireless 0.73 W/kg
Samsung SGH-t339 Yes T-Mobile 0.73 W/kg
Samsung SGH-a137 Yes AT&T GoPhone, AT&T 0.20 - 0.76 W/kg
LG LX400 Yes Sprint 0.36 - 0.77 W/kg
LG Voyager (VX10000) Yes Verizon Wireless 0.77 W/kg
Samsung MyShot (SCH-r430) Yes Cricket, MetroPCS 0.78 W/kg
Samsung Exclaim (SPH-m550) Yes Sprint 0.29 - 0.78 W/kg
Samsung Access (SGH-a827) Yes AT&T 0.24 - 0.78 W/kg
Sanyo KATANA LX (SCP-3800) Yes Sprint, CREDO 0.53 - 0.78 W/kg
Motorola W175 Yes TracFone 0.79 W/kg
LG Rhythm (UX585) Yes U.S. Cellular 0.80 W/kg
Motorola MOTO W755 Yes Verizon Wireless 0.80 W/kg
Samsung SGH-t109 Yes T-Mobile 0.80 W/kg
Sony Ericsson W760a Yes AT&T 0.81 W/kg
Nokia 5610 Yes T-Mobile 0.81 W/kg
Samsung Eternity(SGH-a867) Yes AT&T 0.11 - 0.82 W/kg
Nokia 7510 Yes T-Mobile 0.84 W/kg
LG 225 Yes TracFone 0.85 W/kg
HTC Touch Diamond (DIAM400) Yes Verizon Wireless 0.85 W/kg
HTC Touch Diamond Yes Verizon Wireless 0.85 - 0.86 W/kg
HTC Touch Diamond (DIAM500) Yes Sprint, Alltel 0.86 W/kg
ZTE C79 Yes MetroPCS 0.87 W/kg
Nokia 6301 Yes T-Mobile 0.71 - 0.87 W/kg
Sony Ericsson W200a Yes CellularONE 0.87 W/kg
Samsung Slash (SPH-m310) Yes Virgin Mobile 0.87 W/kg
Samsung Gleam (SCH-u700) Yes Verizon Wireless 0.87 W/kg
LG CU405 Yes AT&T GoPhone 0.88 W/kg
Motorola Rapture VU30 Yes Verizon Wireless 0.88 W/kg
Sanyo Katana Yes Kajeet 0.68 - 0.88 W/kg
Motorola RAZR V3 Yes AT&T GoPhone, AT&T, T-Mobile 0.89 W/kg
T-Mobile Sidekick LX Yes T-Mobile 0.89 W/kg
LG Tritan (UX840) Yes U.S. Cellular 0.89 W/kg
HTC Touch PRO Yes Sprint, U.S. Cellular, Verizon Wireless, CREDO 0.91 W/kg
Sanyo KATANA Eclipse X Yes Sprint 0.60 - 0.91 W/kg
Palm Pre Yes Sprint, Verizon Wireless 0.92 W/kg
Samsung SGH-t439 Yes CellularONE, T-Mobile 0.92 W/kg
Nokia 6650 Yes AT&T 0.92 W/kg
Samsung Mantra Yes Virgin Mobile 0.93 W/kg
LG VX5500 Yes Verizon Wireless 0.95 W/kg
LG 600G Yes TracFone 0.96 W/kg
Samsung Renown (SCH-u810) Yes Verizon Wireless 0.96 W/kg
Nokia 6205 Yes Verizon Wireless 0.96 W/kg
Sony Ericsson Z310a Yes AT&T, AT&T GoPhone 0.96 W/kg
LG LX150 Yes Kajeet 0.76 - 0.96 W/kg
Samsung Propel (SGH-a767) Yes AT&T 0.26 - 0.97 W/kg
Samsung Behold (SGH-t919) Yes T-Mobile 0.99 W/kg
ZTE C78 Yes MetroPCS 0.99 W/kg
LG Neon Yes AT&T, CellularONE 1.00 W/kg
Samsung SGH-T101G Yes TracFone 1.00 W/kg
Nokia 6085 Yes AT&T, AT&T GoPhone 1.00 W/kg
Nokia 2600 Yes AT&T, AT&T GoPhone 1.00 W/kg
Samsung MyShot II Yes Cricket 1.00 W/kg
Blackberry Curve 8900 Yes AT&T, T-Mobile 1.01 W/kg
Nokia 3220 Yes CellularONE, T-Mobile 0.71 - 1.01 W/kg
Nokia 3600 Slide Yes CellularONE 1.01 W/kg
Samsung Rant (SPH-m540) Yes Sprint 0.70 - 1.01 W/kg
Motorola MOTOROKR E8 Yes CellularONE, T-Mobile 1.02 W/kg
Motorola i580 Yes Sprint 1.02 W/kg
Helio Ocean2 Yes Virgin Mobile 1.02 W/kg
Samsung Delve (SCH-r800) Yes U.S. Cellular, Alltel 0.80 - 1.04 W/kg
Samsung JACK (i637) Yes AT&T 0.42 - 1.04 W/kg
Samsung JetSet (SCH-r550) Yes Cricket 1.05 W/kg
Samsung Byline (SCH-r310) Yes MetroPCS 0.63 - 1.05 W/kg
Samsung SGH-T349 Yes T-Mobile 1.05 W/kg
Nokia 1680 Yes T-Mobile 1.06 W/kg
Samsung SCH-R311 Yes U.S. Cellular 1.06 W/kg
Samsung SCH-u430 Yes Verizon Wireless 1.07 W/kg
Nokia 7205 Intrigue Yes Verizon Wireless 1.08 W/kg
Motorola Hint QA30 Yes Cricket, U.S. Cellular, MetroPCS 1.08 W/kg
Samsung Glyde (SCH-u940) Yes Verizon Wireless 1.08 W/kg
Motorola W490 Yes CellularONE, T-Mobile 1.08 W/kg
Samsung SPH-m220 Yes Sprint, CREDO 0.75 - 1.08 W/kg
Blackberry Curve 8320 Yes AT&T 1.08 W/kg
Motorola i365 Yes Sprint 1.09 W/kg
Samsung SPH-m300 Yes Kajeet, CREDO, Sprint 0.79 - 1.09 W/kg
Blackberry Curve 8310 Yes AT&T 1.09 W/kg
Samsung Smooth (SCH-u350) Yes Verizon Wireless 1.09 W/kg
LG Dare (VX9700) Yes Verizon Wireless 1.09 W/kg
Blackberry Curve 8350i Yes Sprint 1.10 W/kg
Nokia 2610 Yes AT&T GoPhone, CellularONE, T-Mobile, AT&T 1.10 W/kg
Nokia 2760 Yes CellularONE, T-Mobile 0.74 - 1.10 W/kg
UTStarcom GTX75 (aka AT&T Quickfire) Yes AT&T 0.36 - 1.10 W/kg
T-Mobile G1 with Google Yes T-Mobile 1.11 W/kg
Samsung SPH-M320 Yes Sprint, CREDO 0.81 - 1.11 W/kg
Samsung SGH-a437 Yes AT&T GoPhone, AT&T 0.72 - 1.11 W/kg
Samsung Step (SCH-r470 Two) Yes U.S. Cellular 1.00 - 1.11 W/kg
Nokia 2605 Mirage Yes Verizon Wireless 1.12 W/kg
UTStarcom CDM7126 Yes Cricket, MetroPCS 1.13 W/kg
Motorola Evoke QA4 Yes Cricket 1.13 W/kg
LG 3280 Yes TracFone 1.13 W/kg
HTC Fuze (RAPH110) Yes AT&T 1.13 W/kg
HTC Fuze Yes AT&T 1.13 W/kg
Samsung Knack (SCH-u310) Yes Verizon Wireless 1.14 W/kg
Samsung SGH-a237 Yes AT&T, AT&T GoPhone 1.07 - 1.14 W/kg
LG VX8360 Yes Verizon Wireless 1.14 W/kg
LG Lotus (LX600) Yes Sprint 0.90 - 1.15 W/kg
Blackberry Pearl Flip 8220 Yes T-Mobile 1.15 W/kg
Motorola Krave ZN4 Yes Verizon Wireless 1.16 W/kg
Samsung Tint (SCH-R420 Yes MetroPCS 0.68 - 1.17 W/kg
Motorola Clutch i465 Yes Boost Mobile, Sprint 1.17 W/kg
LG CP150 Yes AT&T GoPhone 1.18 W/kg
LG 410G Yes TracFone 1.18 W/kg
LG LX160 Yes Kajeet, Sprint 1.19 W/kg
Apple iPhone 3G S Yes AT&T 0.52 - 1.19 W/kg
Samsung SGH-t819 Yes T-Mobile 1.19 W/kg
Samsung BlackJack II (SGH-i617) Yes AT&T 0.61 - 1.20 W/kg
Samsung SCH-U440 Yes U.S. Cellular 1.13 - 1.21 W/kg
Sanyo PRO-200 Yes Sprint 0.41 - 1.21 W/kg
Samsung Finesse (SCH-r810) Yes MetroPCS 1.22 W/kg
LG CE110 Yes AT&T, AT&T GoPhone 1.22 W/kg
Motorola MOTOACTV W450 Yes T-Mobile 1.23 W/kg
Motorola MOTORAKR Z6m Yes MetroPCS 1.23 W/kg
Samsung Solstice (SGH-A877) Yes AT&T 0.67 - 1.23 W/kg
Sony Ericsson C905a Cyber-shot Yes AT&T, CellularONE 0.67 - 1.23 W/kg
Motorola The Buzz ic502 Yes Sprint 1.24 W/kg
Blackberry Pearl 8110 Yes AT&T 1.24 W/kg
Samsung SGH-t219 Yes T-Mobile 1.24 W/kg
Sanyo PRO-700 Yes Sprint 0.54 - 1.24 W/kg
Nokia 5310 Yes T-Mobile 1.11 - 1.25 W/kg
Nokia 5310 Xpress Music Yes CellularONE 1.25 W/kg
Sanyo SCP-2700 Yes Sprint, CREDO 1.16 - 1.25 W/kg
Motorola RAZR V3i Yes CellularONE, AT&T, T-Mobile 1.26 W/kg
Samsung SCH-r211 Yes Cricket 1.26 W/kg
LG VU (CU915) Yes AT&T 1.26 W/kg
LG Chocolate 3 (VX8560) Yes Verizon Wireless 1.26 W/kg
Helio Fin Yes Virgin Mobile 0.53 - 1.27 W/kg
Nokia 3606 Yes Cricket 1.27 W/kg
Samsung Sway (SCH-u650) Yes Verizon Wireless 1.28 W/kg
Blackberry 8820 Yes AT&T, T-Mobile, Verizon Wireless 1.28 W/kg
LG enV Touch (VX11000,Voyager 2) Yes Verizon Wireless 1.28 W/kg
Samsung SGH-a637 Yes AT&T 0.45 - 1.28 W/kg
Samsung SGH-a737 Yes AT&T 0.43 - 1.28 W/kg
Nokia 5800 XpressMusic Yes CellularONE 1.29 W/kg
Motorola Moto Q Global Yes AT&T 1.29 W/kg
Verizon Wireless CDM8975PTT Yes Verizon Wireless 1.30 W/kg
LG INCITE (CT810) Yes AT&T 1.30 W/kg
Samsung Epix (SGH-i907) Yes AT&T 0.52 - 1.30 W/kg
LG LX290 Yes Sprint 1.04 - 1.30 W/kg
Motorola i880 Yes Sprint 1.30 W/kg
LG 200C Yes TracFone 1.30 W/kg
Motorola MOTO Q 9m Yes Verizon Wireless 1.30 W/kg
Cricket TXTM8 Yes Cricket 1.30 W/kg
Verizon Wireless CDM8975 Yes Verizon Wireless 1.30 W/kg
Samsung SCH-u410 Yes Verizon Wireless 1.31 W/kg
LG enV 3 (VX9200) Yes Verizon Wireless 1.31 W/kg
Samsung Juke (SCH-u470) Yes Verizon Wireless 1.31 W/kg
Nokia Surge 6790 Yes AT&T 1.31 W/kg
Samsung Omnia (SCH-i910) Yes Verizon Wireless 1.31 W/kg
Motorola W376g Yes TracFone 1.32 W/kg
Motorola Tundra VA76r Yes AT&T 1.32 W/kg
Samsung Instinct s30 Yes Sprint 1.05 - 1.33 W/kg
Nokia 6555 Yes AT&T 0.93 - 1.33 W/kg
Motorola V176 Yes TracFone 1.33 W/kg
Motorola MOTORAZR VE20 Yes Sprint, U.S. Cellular 1.34 W/kg
LG Invision (CB630) Yes AT&T 1.34 W/kg
Samsung Trance (SCH-u490) Yes Verizon Wireless 1.34 W/kg
Samsung SCH-u540 Yes Verizon Wireless 1.34 W/kg
Verizon Wireless G’zOne Type S Yes Verizon Wireless 1.34 W/kg
Verizon Wireless G’zOne Type S PTT Yes Verizon Wireless 1.34 W/kg
LG enV 2 (VX9100) Yes Verizon Wireless 1.34 W/kg
Motorola MotoEM330 Yes AT&T 1.35 W/kg
Palm Centro Yes AT&T, CellularONE, Sprint, Verizon Wireless 1.09 - 1.35 W/kg
Samsung SPH-z400 Yes Sprint 0.72 - 1.36 W/kg
Motorola MOTOROKR U9 Yes CellularONE 1.36 W/kg
LG LX370 Yes Sprint 0.90 - 1.36 W/kg
Samsung ACE (SPH-i325) Yes Sprint 1.00 - 1.36 W/kg
Motorola C261 Yes TracFone 1.38 W/kg
LG Versa (VX9600) Yes Verizon Wireless 1.38 W/kg
Verizon Wireless CDM8950 Yes Verizon Wireless 1.38 W/kg
Nokia 1606 Yes Cricket, MetroPCS 1.38 W/kg
Samsung SCH-u340 Yes Cricket, U.S. Cellular, Verizon Wireless 1.38 W/kg
Apple iPhone 3G Yes AT&T 0.24 - 1.39 W/kg
Samsung SCH-u550 Yes Verizon Wireless 1.39 W/kg
Helio Mysto Yes Virgin Mobile 1.21 - 1.39 W/kg
Motorola W370 Yes TracFone 1.40 W/kg
Samsung FlipShot (SCH-u900) Yes Verizon Wireless 1.40 W/kg
Motorola RAZR V3s Yes MetroPCS 1.40 W/kg
Nokia E71 Yes CellularONE 1.23 - 1.40 W/kg
Palm Treo PRO (T850EWW) Yes Sprint 1.40 W/kg
Nokia E71x Yes AT&T 1.41 W/kg
Sony Ericsson Z750a Yes AT&T 1.42 W/kg
Samsung Messager, Mister Cartoon (SCH-r450) Yes Cricket, MetroPCS 1.42 W/kg
Motorola C139 Yes TracFone 1.43 W/kg
Blackberry 8703e Yes Verizon Wireless 1.44 W/kg
Samsung Highnote (SPH-m630) Yes Sprint 0.74 - 1.45 W/kg
Motorola i576 Yes Sprint 1.45 W/kg
Motorola i776 Yes Sprint 1.45 W/kg
Motorola Adventure V750 Yes Verizon Wireless 1.45 W/kg
Motorola Boost i776 Yes Boost Mobile 1.45 W/kg
Samsung SGH-a777 Yes AT&T 0.63 - 1.46 W/kg
Samsung Instinct (SPH-m800) Yes Sprint 1.16 - 1.46 W/kg
Firefly GlowPhone Yes CellularONE 1.46 W/kg
Samsung Spex (SCH-r210) Yes Cricket, U.S. Cellular 1.46 W/kg
Blackberry 8700g Yes T-Mobile 1.46 W/kg
Kyocera Neo E1100 Yes U.S. Cellular, MetroPCS 1.46 W/kg
Helio Heat Yes Virgin Mobile 0.85 - 1.46 W/kg
Sony Ericsson TM506 Yes T-Mobile 1.46 W/kg
Blackberry 8830 World Edition Yes U.S. Cellular, Verizon Wireless, Sprint 1.46 W/kg
Blackberry Pearl 8120 Yes T-Mobile, AT&T 1.48 W/kg
Sanyo S1 Yes Sprint 1.46 - 1.48 W/kg
Blackberry Pearl 8130 Yes Sprint, U.S. Cellular, Verizon Wireless 1.48 W/kg
Motorola MOTOSLVR L9 Yes CellularONE 1.48 W/kg
HTC SMT 5800 Yes Verizon Wireless 1.49 W/kg
Kyocera Melo S1300 Yes MetroPCS 1.11 - 1.50 W/kg
Kyocera S1300 Yes Cricket 1.11 - 1.50 W/kg
Nokia 1006 Yes MetroPCS 1.50 W/kg
Motorola V365 Yes AT&T 1.51 W/kg
Blackberry Curve 8300 Yes T-Mobile, AT&T 1.51 W/kg
Blackberry Bold 9000 Yes AT&T 1.51 W/kg
LG Rumor2 (LX265) Yes Sprint 1.04 - 1.51 W/kg
Motorola MOTO VE240 Yes Cricket, MetroPCS 1.52 W/kg
Motorola i335 Yes Sprint 1.53 W/kg
Motorola C290 Yes Kajeet, Sprint 1.53 W/kg
T-Mobile Shadow Yes T-Mobile 1.53 W/kg
Blackberry Curve 8330 Yes Sprint, U.S. Cellular, Verizon Wireless, MetroPCS, CREDO 1.54 W/kg
Motorola W385 Yes U.S. Cellular, Verizon Wireless 1.54 W/kg
Motorola MOTO VU204 Yes Verizon Wireless 1.55 W/kg
Kyocera Jax S1300 Yes Virgin Mobile 1.55 W/kg
T-Mobile myTouch 3G Yes T-Mobile 1.55 W/kg
Kyocera K132 Yes Cricket N/A
Kyocera TNT! S2400 Yes Virgin Mobile N/A
Cricket EZ Yes Cricket N/A
HTC Touch Yes CellularONE N/A
Motorola Boost i776w Yes Boost Mobile N/A
Blackberry Tour 9630 Smartphone Yes Sprint N/A
Motorola W315 Yes Verizon Wireless N/A
Pantech C630 Yes AT&T N/A
Kyocera Marbl K127 Yes Virgin Mobile N/A
LG Wine (UX280) Yes U.S. Cellular N/A
Motorola Multimedia RAZR Yes Verizon Wireless N/A
Pantech Matrix Pro Yes AT&T N/A
LG Shine (CU720) Yes AT&T N/A
HTC Touch Diamond XV6950 Yes Verizon Wireless N/A
Motorola Q9 Yes CellularONE N/A
Kyocera K126C Yes TracFone N/A
Blackberry Pearl Flip 8230 Yes U.S. Cellular N/A
Pantech Matrix Yes AT&T N/A
Motorola RAZR Yes Verizon Wireless N/A
Sierra Wireless 598U Yes Sprint N/A
Pantech C610 Yes AT&T N/A
Kyocera X-tc M2000 Yes Virgin Mobile N/A
LG Rumor Yes Kajeet N/A
Motorola MOTO Q 9c Yes CREDO, Sprint N/A
Sony z555a Yes CellularONE N/A
Pantech Breeze Yes AT&T N/A
Pantech Slate (C530) Yes AT&T, AT&T GoPhone N/A
HTC Touch (ELF0100) Yes CellularONE, U.S. Cellular N/A
Motorola Boost i290 Yes Boost Mobile N/A
HTC Snap Yes Sprint N/A
Motorola i920 Yes Sprint N/A
Motorola Renew W233 Yes T-Mobile N/A
Sony Ericsson F305 Yes CellularONE N/A
LG Flare (LX165) Yes Virgin Mobile N/A
Blackberry Curve 8830 Yes Sprint N/A
Motorola Boost i335 Yes Boost Mobile N/A
Motorola KRZR Yes CellularONE N/A
Motorola V170 Yes TracFone N/A
Sony Ericsson W350 Yes AT&T, AT&T GoPhone N/A
Kyocera Mako S4000 Yes MetroPCS N/A
Cricket A100 Yes Cricket N/A
Motorola V195s Yes T-Mobile N/A
Samsung t636 Yes CellularONE N/A
Verizon Wireless G’zOne Boulder Yes Verizon Wireless N/A
Verizon Wireless Blitz Yes Verizon Wireless N/A
Verizon Wireless XV6900 Yes Verizon Wireless N/A
UTStarcom Shuttle Yes Virgin Mobile N/A
UTStarcom Arc Yes Virgin Mobile N/A
Palm Treo 755p Yes Sprint N/A

http://www.ewg.org/cellphoneradiation/Get-a-Safer-Phone?allavailable=1

I PHONE Safety September 24, 2009

Posted by healthyself in Bioeffects, Biofield, Electromagnetic Field, Electromagnetic Interference, Electromagnetic pollution, Electromagnetic Radiation, Electrosmog, Emissions, Exposure, radiation.
1 comment so far

“As innovative and popular as it is, the iPhone may well be one of the worst offenders, for a number of reasons.

Even when you’re not using your iPhone but have it on, it still operates as a base station, transmitting radiation to you.

Further, iPhones tend to get a great deal of use due to their amazing plethora of applications, which increases your risk.

Data waves from your iPhone substantially affect your biology, altering intercellular communication.  But, iPhones aren’t the only offenders.  Though they may not act as base stations, every phone still has to connect to a base station.  As long as your phone is turned on, it continually emits EMR in an attempt to connect to that base station.”

http://products.mercola.com/blue-tube-headset/?source=nl

Vital Force June 9, 2009

Posted by healthyself in Blogroll, Quantum Physics.
add a comment

“Our physical structures do not first exist and then radiate energy; our energy determines our physical structures.” The software that governs the human body is a non-electromagnetic energy called Subtle Energy. It is the body’s own Vital Force. Our formulations combine the Western understanding of quantum physics and the Eastern understanding of Chi and the Five Elements.

The Energy Within by Dr. R.M. Chin M.D.

EMF’s and the Heart March 19, 2009

Posted by healthyself in Blogroll, Blood Brain Barrier, Brain, Brain Waves, Ear, ear ache, EEG, Electrical Pulses, Electrical Surges, Electrochemical Communications, Electromagetic pollution, Electromagnetic pollution, Electromagnetic Radiation, Electrosensitivity, EMF Exposure, EMF Research, EMF's, EMF-induced effects, Hearing, Heart, Heart Attacks, Heart Disease, Heightened Risk.
1 comment so far

“The heart’s EMF (electro-magnetic field) is five thousand times more powerful than the electromagnetic field created by the brain and, in addition to its immense power, has subtle, non-local effects that travel within these forms of energy. … the heart generates over fifty thousand femtoteslas (a measure of EMF) compared to less than ten femtoteslas recorded from the brain.” (p. 55) The profound significance of these facts leads … to comment: “The Heart’s Code points the way to a new revolution in our thinking. Metaphorically, the heart is the sun, the pulsing, energetic centre of our biophysical “solar”system, and the brain is the earth, one of the most important planets in our biophysical system. One implication of the energy cardiology/cardio-energetic revolution is the radical (meaning “root”) idea that energetically, the brain revolves around the heart, not the other way around.” (1998, p. xii) The heart is the largest source of biophysical energy in the body and within our psychological life. … the heart involves energy and information that comprises the essence or soul of who we are. The idea, that the heart is the centre of the psychology of the individual, instead of the brain, would indeed revolutionize our understanding of normal and supernormal psychology. Adopting this view would be analogous to the Copernican revolution, wherein scientists realized that the earth, rather than being the centre of the universe, traveled around the sun within the solar system. The egocentric attitude of humans was shattered. Likewise, the acceptance of a deeper conceptualization of the heart, consciousness and the nature of Self would constitute a revolutionary development in modern psychology, philosophy and the life sciences.”

http://www.zeropoint.ca/heartIII6enigmasheart.htm

“The Soviets have led the way in learning about the risks of electropollution, and, as we have seen, they’ve apparently been the first to harness those dangers for malicious intent. .. the spectrum of potential weapons extends far beyond the limits of the Moscow signal, and Americans have been actively exploring some of them for many years. Most or all …EMR effects can be scaled up or down for use against individuals or whole crowds …”

“The crudest of these … would be a sort of electromagnetic flamethrower with a greater range than chemical types.  Dogs were cooked to death in experiments … as long ago as 1955, and high-power transmitters using short UHF wavelengths can severely burn exposed skin in seconds.”……

.”…. discovery that certain pulsed microwave beams increased the permeability of the blood-brain barrier could be turned into a supplemental weapon to enhance the effects of drugs, bacteria, or poisons.”

“…calcium-outflow windows …could be used to interfere with the functioning of the entire brain….”

“… microwaves of 300 to 3,000 megahertz were pulsed at specific rates, humans (even deaf people) could “hear” them. The beam caused a booming, hissing, clicking, or buzzing, depending on the exact frequency and pulse rate, and the sound seemed to come from just behind the head…”

“….ridiculed for this announcement, just like many radar technicians who’d been told they were crazy for hearing certain radar beams. Later work has shown that the microwaves are sensed somewhere in the temporal region just above and slightly in front of the ears. The phenomenon apparently results from pressure waves set up in brain tissue, some of which activate the sound receptors of the inner ear via bone conduction, while others directly stimulate nerve cells in the auditory pathways. Experiments on rats have shown that a strong signal can generate a sound pressure of 120 decibels, or approximately the level near a jet engine at takeoff….”

“…could speed up, slow down, or stop isolated frog hearts by synchronizing the pulse rate of a microwave beam with the beat of the heart itself. Similiar results have been obtained using live frogs, indicating that it’s technically feasible to produce heart attacks with a ray designed to penetrate the human chest.”

http://www.fiu.edu/~mizrachs/emf-war.html

Sleeping Brain Waves March 17, 2009

Posted by healthyself in Biological Activity, Blogroll, Sleep.
3 comments

“If you attach an electroencephalograph to a person’s head, you can record the person’s brainwave activity. An awake and relaxed person generates alpha waves, … consistent oscillations at about 10 cycles per second. An alert person generates beta waves, …. about twice as fast.  During sleep, two slower patterns called theta waves and delta waves take over. Theta waves have oscillations in the 3.5 to 7 cycle per second range… delta waves are … below 3.5 cycles per second. As a person falls asleep and sleep deepens, the brainwave patterns slow down. The slower the brain wave patterns, the deeper the sleep – a person deep in delta wave sleep is hardest to wake …. At several points during the night, Rapid Eye Movement (REM) sleep occurs, and brainwaves during this period speed up to awake levels (alpha or beta).”

http://library.thinkquest.org/C005545/english/sleep/waves.htm

“…[A} pervasive misconception about sleep is that [it] is just a matter of ..bodies “turning off” for several hours, followed by … bodies “turning back on” when … awake. …most of us think of sleep as a passive and relatively constant and unchanging process…. sleep is a very active state. … bodies move frequently… roll about during the night… brain activity is even more varied than it is during the normal waking state. …”

Sleep Stages: Measures

” …. [There are} three fundamental measures... basis for defining stages of sleep....gross brain wave activity ... as measured by an electroencephalogram (EEG)...[which] provides the summary of electrical activity from one area of the brain. … muscle tone is measured with a electromyogram (EMG) machine…. eye movement is recorded via an electro-oculogram (EOG)….

“…The EEG reading is the most important measure in differentiating between the stages, while the EMG and EOG are most important in differentiating rapid eye movement (REM) sleep from the other stages.

Sleep Stages: Waking through Stage 2

“….When awake, most people exhibit brain wave, (EEG) patterns that can be classified into two types of waves, beta and alpha. Beta waves are those associated with day to day wakefulness. These waves are the highest in frequency and lowest in amplitude, and… more desynchronous than other waves…. the waves are not very consistent in their pattern. This desynchrony makes sense given that day to day mental activity consists of many cognitive, sensory, and motor activities and experiences, and, thus, when awake, we are mentally desynchronous …”

“During periods of relaxation, while… awake,  …brain waves become slower, increase in amplitude and become more synchronous. These types of waves are called alpha waves. … such brain waves are often associated with states of relaxation and peacefulness during meditation and biofeedback….. recent evidence indicates that activities that promote alpha wave activity, appear to have positive health benefits.”

“The first stage of sleep is characterized by theta waves, which are even slower in frequency and greater in amplitude than alpha waves. The difference between relaxation and stage 1 sleep is gradual and subtle. As the sleeper moves to stage 2 sleep theta wave activity continues, interspersed with two unusual wave phenomena. These phenomena, which occur periodically every minute or so, and are defining characteristics of stage 2 sleep, are termed sleep spindles and K complexes … The former is a sudden increase in wave frequency, and the latter is a sudden increase in wave amplitude. Stages 1 and 2 are relatively “light” stages of sleep. In fact, if someone is… [wakened] during one of these stages, he or she will often report not being asleep…”

Sleep Stages: Delta Sleep, REM, and the Sleep Cycle

“During a normal nights sleep a sleeper passes from the theta waves of stage 1 and 2, to the delta waves of stage 3 and 4. Delta waves are the slowest and highest amplitude brain waves. There is no real division between stages 3 and 4 except that, typically, stage 3 is considered delta sleep in which less than 50 percent of the waves are delta waves, and in stage 4 more than 50 percent of the waves are delta waves. Delta sleep is our deepest sleep, the point when our brain waves are least like waking. Consequently, it is most difficult stage in which to wake sleepers,… when they are awakened they are usually sleepy and disoriented…. delta sleep is when sleep walking and sleep talking is most likely to occur.”

“… another, unique, stage of sleep exists, REM. This stage gets its name from the darting eye movements that accompany it (rapid eye movement), as indicated by the EOG…. characterized by a sudden and dramatic loss of muscle tone, which is measured by the EMG. In fact, the skeletal muscles of a person during REM sleep are effectively paralyzed. This stage is …associated with a unique brain wave pattern…during REM sleep a sleepers brain waves demonstrate characteristics…similar to waking sleep, a combination of alpha, beta, and desynchronous waves…. this is the stage of sleep most associated with dreaming. When a sleeper in a research lab begins to exhibit the physiological indices of R.E.M sleep, and they are awakened, the great majority of the time they will report that they were having a vivid, story-like, dream. During other stages, on the other hand, they normally do not report dreaming….”

The vivid recall that could be elicited in the middle of the night when a subject was awakened while his eyes were moving rapidly was nothing short of miraculous. It [seemed to open] … an exciting new world to the subjects whose only previous dream memories had been the vague morning-after recall. Now, instead of perhaps some fleeting glimpse into the dream world each night, the subjects could be tuned into the middle of as many as ten or twelve dreams every night.

(Dement, 1978, p. 37; quoted in Pinel, 1993)

“In a normal night’s sleep, a sleeper begins in stage 1, moves down through the stages, to stage 4, then back up through the stages, with the exception that stage 1 is replaced by REM, then the sleeper goes back down through the stages again. One cycle, from stage 1 to REM takes approximately ninety minutes. This cycle is repeated throughout the night, with the length of REM periods increasing, and the length of delta sleep decreasing, until during the last few cycles there is no delta sleep at all.”

http://web.mst.edu/~psyworld/sleep_stages.htm

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 34 other followers