jump to navigation

Victims of Mast Radiation October 18, 2006

Posted by healthyself in Animal Research, Bioeffects, Biological Activity, Biological Dentistry, Biological Effects, Biomimetic, BioPhotons, Bioscalar Energy, Birth Defects, Blogroll, Brainwave Interference, Cell changes, Cell Cultures, Cell death, cell membrane, Cell phone industry, CFIDS, Children's health, Chromosomal damage, Chronic Exhaustion, Chronic Fatigue, Chronic Illness, Communication, Conversations, Cordless Phones, Cytotoxic Effects, Decision Making, Definitions, Diagnostic marker, Digital, DNA, EHF, Electrical Components, Electrical Pulses, Electrical Surges, Electrical Wiring, Electrochemical, Electromagetic pollution, electromagnetic, Electromagnetic Communications, Electromagnetic Field, Electromagnetic Interference, Electromagnetic pollution, Electromagnetic Spectrum, Electromagnetic waves, Electrosensitivity, Electrosmog, ELF, Emergency Medicine, EMF Research, EMF's, Employees, EMR, Environment, Epidemiologists, Epidemiology, Family, Financial Considerations, Frequencies, Funding, GHz, headaches, Health related, HF, High Frequencies, high voltage transmission lines, HOuseholds, HRD, Hz, Immune system, Integrative Medicine, Interdisciplinary, Lack of Concentration, Legal Issues, LF, Lifestyle, Long Term Health Risks, Low Frequencies, MCS, Medical Research, Medicine, Men's Health, MF, MHz, Microwave exposure, Migraines, mobile telephones, MS, Neural Electrophysiology, Non Profit Organizations, Public Policy, Pulsed Radiation, Quantum Physics, radiation, Research, Research Needed, Resonant Frequency, Risk Factor, Risk of Disease, SAR, School administrators, SHF, Sick People, Sleep disturbances, Telecommunications, Transformation, University, Waves, Women's Health.
3 comments

[There]..” is a website dedicated to a international community of people suffering adverse health effects from masts and antennas in the vicinity of their homes.

If you are a victim of mast radiation or strongly concerned about the issue, please write your story and share your thoughts on this website! Please click on “Tell your story” in the left hand menu and create an online case history file. You don’t need to register with this website to participate and no personal information will be recorded. You only give out as much information as you wish to.
You can also email your story to us at: story@mast-victims.org and we will put it online.

The purpose of this website is to bring together people from all over the world that have become victims of insensitive mast and antenna siting. Telecommunications companies are drowning us in radiation and they are in a state of complete denial on whether these masts and antennas have any negative health impact on the population. Credible scientific research shows that especially mobile phone mast radiation is harmful and people are suffering. Some people have even been forced to abandon their homes after becoming ill from radiation.

This has got to change. So far only few people have come forward against the telecommunication industry and those who have deserve to be known and heard.

http://www.mast-victims.org is built as a community where people living under the threat of masts and antennas can record their case histories and share their thoughts online.”

http://www.mast-victims.org/

How is the Electromagnetic Radiation Measured? October 16, 2006

Posted by healthyself in Blogroll, Definitions, Electrical Components, Electrical Pulses, Electrical Surges, Electrical Wiring, Electromagetic pollution, electromagnetic, Electromagnetic Communications, Electromagnetic Field, Electromagnetic Interference, Electromagnetic pollution, Electromagnetic Spectrum, Electromagnetic waves, Electrosensitivity, Electrosmog, ELF, EMF's, EMR, Environment, Exposure, Frequencies, GHz, Global Warming, Government's role, HF, High Frequencies, high voltage transmission lines, HOuseholds, Hz, Infrared, LF, Lifestyle, light beam, Low Frequencies, MF, MHz, Microwave exposure, Pulsed Radiation, Pulses, Quantum Waves, radiation, Radio Waves, Radios, Sound, Spectrum, transmission, Ultraviolet, Unified Field, Visible Light, VLF, Waves.
1 comment so far

…The electromagnetic (EM) spectrum is …types of radiation … as a group. Radiation is energy that travels and spreads out as it goes– visible light …. from a lamp….or radio waves .. or from a radio station are two types of electromagnetic radiation. Other examples of EM radiation are microwaves, infrared and ultraviolet light, X-rays and gamma-rays. Hotter, more energetic objects and events create higher energy radiation than cool objects. Only extremely hot objects or particles moving at very high velocities can create high-energy radiation like X-rays and gamma-rays. Here are the different types of radiation in the EM spectrum, in order from lowest energy to highest:

Radio Radio: …this is the same kind of energy that radio stations emit into the air …to capture and turn into your favorite Mozart, Madonna, or Coolio tunes. But radio waves are also emitted by other things … such as stars and gases in space…
Microwave Microwaves: … will cook your popcorn in just a few minutes! In space, microwaves are used by astronomers to learn about the structure of nearby galaxies, including our own Milky Way!
Infrared to UV Infrared: we often think of this as being the same thing as ‘heat’, because it makes our skin feel warm. In space, IR light maps the dust between stars. Visible:…this is the part that our eyes see. Visible radiation is emitted by everything from fireflies to light bulbs to stars … also by fast-moving particles hitting other particles.

Ultraviolet: we know that the Sun is a source of ultraviolet (or UV) radiation, because it is the UV rays that cause our skin to burn! Stars and other “hot” objects in space emit UV radiation.

X-ray X-rays: your doctor uses them to look at your bones and your dentist to look at your teeth. Hot gases in the Universe also emit X-rays .
Gamma-ray Gamma-rays: radioactive materials (some natural and others made by man in things like nuclear power plants) can emit gamma-rays. Big particle accelerators that scientists use to help them understand what matter is made of can sometimes generate gamma-rays. But the biggest gamma-ray generator of all is the Universe! It makes gamma radiation in all kinds of ways.

A Radio Wave is not a Gamma-Ray, a Microwave is not an X-ray … or is it?

Across the EM spectrum
Radio waves, visible light, X-rays, and all the other parts of the electromagnetic spectrum are fundamentally the same thing, electromagnetic radiation.

We may think that radio waves are completely different physical objects or events than gamma-rays. They are produced in very different ways, and we detect them in different ways. But are they really different things? The answer is ‘no’. Radio waves, visible light, X-rays, and all the other parts of the electromagnetic spectrum are fundamentally the same thing. They are all electromagnetic radiation.

Electromagnetic radiation can be described in terms of a stream of photons, which are massless particles each traveling in a wave-like pattern and moving at the speed of light. Each photon contains a certain amount (or bundle) of energy, and all electromagnetic radiation consists of these photons. The only difference between the various types of electromagnetic radiation is the amount of energy found in the photons. Radio waves have photons with low energies, microwaves have a little more energy than radio waves, infrared has still more, then visible, ultraviolet, X-rays, and … the most energetic of all … gamma-rays.

Across the EM spectrum
The electromagnetic spectrum can be expressed in terms of energy, wavelength, or frequency.

“Actually, the electromagnetic spectrum can be expressed in terms of energy, wavelength, or frequency. Each way of thinking about the EM spectrum is related to the others in a precise mathematical way. So why do we have three ways of describing things, each with a different set of physical units? After all, frequency is measured in cycles per second (which is called a Hertz), wavelength is measured in meters, and energy is measured in electron volts.”

“The answer is that scientists don’t like to use big numbers when they don’t have to. It is much easier to say or write “two kilometers or 2 km” than “two thousand meters or 2,000 m”. So generally, scientists use whatever units are easiest for whatever they are working with. In radio astronomy, astronomers tend to use wavelengths or frequencies. This is because most of the radio part of the EM spectrum falls in the range from a about 1 cm to 1 km (30 gigahertz (GHz) to 100 kilohertz (kHz)). The radio is a very broad part of the EM spectrum. Infrared astronomers also use wavelength to describe their part of the EM spectrum. They tend to use microns (or millionths of meters) for wavelengths, so that they can say their part of the EM spectrum falls in the range 1 to 100 microns. Optical astronomers use wavelengths as well. In the older “CGS” version of the metric system, the units used were angstroms. An angstrom is equal to 0.0000000001 meters (10-10 m in scientific notation)! In the newer “SI” version of the metric system, we think of visible light in units of nanometers or 0.000000001 meters (10-9 m). In this system, the violet, blue, green, yellow, orange, and red light we know so well has wavelengths between 400 and 700 nanometers. This range is only a small part of the entire EM spectrum, so you can tell that the light we see is just a little fraction of all the EM radiation around us! By the time you get to the ultraviolet, X-ray, and gamma-ray regions of the EM spectrum, lengths have become too tiny to think about any more. So scientists usually refer to these photons by their energies, which are measured in electron volts. Ultraviolet radiation falls in the range from a few electron volts (eV) to a about 100 eV. X-ray photons have energies in the range 100 eV to 100,000 eV (or 100 keV). Gamma-rays then are all the photons with energies greater than 100 keV.

Why Do We Have to Go to Space to See All of the Electromagnetic Spectrum?

diagram of EM radiation that reaches the Earth's surface

Electromagnetic radiation from space is unable to reach the surface of the Earth except at a very few wavelengths, such as the visible spectrum, radio frequencies, and some ultraviolet wavelengths. Astronomers can get above enough of the Earth’s atmosphere to observe at some infrared wavelengths from mountain tops or by flying their telescopes in an aircraft. Experiments can also be taken up to altitudes as high as 35 km by balloons which can operate for months. Rocket flights can take instruments all the way above the Earth’s atmosphere for just a few minutes before they fall back to Earth, but a great many important first results in astronomy and astrophysics came from just those few minutes of observations. For long-term observations, however, it is best to have your detector on an orbiting satellite … and get above it all!

http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/science/know_l1/emspectrum.html

Science Says… October 10, 2006

Posted by healthyself in Animal Research, Antennas, Bioeffects, Biomimetic, Blogroll, Brainwave Interference, Cell changes, Cell Cultures, Cell death, cell membrane, Cell phone safety, Cell Phones, Cells, Cellular Morphology, Central Nervous System, Children's health, Chromosomal damage, Computer Rooms, Conversations, Cordless Phones, Cytotoxic Effects, Diagnostic marker, DNA, Electrical Components, Electrical Pulses, Electrical Surges, Electrical Wiring, Electrochemical, Electromagetic pollution, Electromagnetic Communications, Electromagnetic Field, Electromagnetic Interference, Electromagnetic pollution, Electromagnetic waves, Electrosensitivity, Electrosmog, ELF, EMF Research, EMF's, EMR, Encoding, Entrainment, Entropy, Environment, Epidemiology, Exposure, Frequencies, genes, GHz, grams of tissue, Hand Portables, Handheld Units, Health related, HF, High Frequencies, high voltage transmission lines, HOuseholds, Hz, Inner Agitation, Integrative Medicine, Interdisciplinary, Intuition, LF, Lifestyle, Long Term Health Risks, Low Frequencies, Medical Research, Men's Health, Metabolic Changes, MF, MHz, Microwave exposure, Mitochondria, nerves, Networks, Neural Electrophysiology, neurological, Neurotransmitters, Non-Thermal Levels, Parenting, Pulsed Radiation, Pulses, radiation, Radio Waves, Radios, Research Needed, Risk of Disease, Symptoms, Waves, WiFi, Wireless Phones, Women's Health, Workplace.
add a comment

FDTD analysis of a gigahertz TEM cell for ultra-wideband pulse exposure studies of biological specimens

IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2006 May;53(5):780-9.

Ji Z, Hagness SC, Booske JH, Mathur S, Meltz ML.

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Wisconsin, 1415 Engineering Drive, Madison, WI 53706, USA. zji@wisc.edu

Gigahertz transverse electromagnetic (GTEM) transmission cells have been previously used to experimentally study exposure of biological cells to ultra-wideband (UWB), monopolar, electromagnetic pulses. Using finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) simulations we examine the time-dependent electric field waveforms and energy dose spatial distributions within a finite volume of biological cell culture medium during these experiments. The simulations show that when one or more flasks containing cell culture media are placed inside the GTEM cell, the uniform fields of the empty GTEM cell are significantly perturbed. The fields inside the cell culture medium, representing the fields to which the biological cells are exposed, are no longer monopolar and are spatially highly nonuniform. These effects result from a combination of refraction and distortion of the incident wave, combined with excitation of resonant eigenmodes within the cell culture medium volume. The simulations show that these distortions of the incident waveform may be mitigated by supporting the sample on a high permittivity pedestal and modifying the incident waveform to more closely approximate a Gaussian pulse. Under all simulated conditions, the estimated maximum temperature rises are completely negligible, ensuring that any experimentally observed unusual cell function or histopathology can be associated with nonthermal effects.

PMID: 16686400 [PubMed – in process]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=16686400&dopt=Abstract

Tree Hugger’s Beware: Cell Phone Towers October 9, 2006

Posted by healthyself in Biological Effects, Blogroll, Brainwave Interference, Cell phone industry, Cell Phones, Community, Cordless Phones, Electrical Pulses, Electrical Surges, Electromagnetic Communications, Electromagnetic Interference, Electromagnetic pollution, Electromagnetic waves, Electrosensitivity, Electrosmog, ELF, Emergency Medicine, EMF Research, EMF's, Employees, EMR, Environment, Exposure, Frequencies, Health related, High Frequencies, HOuseholds, Hz, Interdisciplinary, Lifestyle, Long Term Health Risks, MHz, Microwave exposure, mobile telephones, Networks, Noise, Pulsed Radiation, Pulses, radiation, Research Needed, Risk of Disease, Safety, Trees, Who is Affected?.
add a comment

ke Cel Towers

http://www.fraudfrond.com/

http://www.polarinertia.com/may05/celltrees12.htm

 

Power Lines, EMF’s, Real Estate Values and Legal Issues October 7, 2006

Posted by healthyself in Aesthetics, Blogroll, Buzzing, Children's health, Conversations, Cordless Phones, Decision Making, Electrical Wiring, Electromagetic pollution, Electromagnetic pollution, Electromagnetic waves, Electrosensitivity, Electrosmog, ELF, EMF Research, EMF's, Environment, Exposure, Financial Considerations, Frequencies, GHz, Health related, HF, High Frequencies, high voltage transmission lines, HOuseholds, Hz, Legal Issues, Lifestyle, Long Term Health Risks, MHz, Microwave exposure, mobile telephones, Parenting, Pulsed Radiation, Radio Waves, Radios, Traffic Pollution, transmission, Who is Affected?, Wireless Phones.
5 comments

Crackling and Buzzing

“Position: Power lines affect property values
This party claims that since there is evidence that there is a health risk, a loss in value to property owners should be recognized. The key driver of this movement has been the environmental groups.”

“University of Missouri-Kansas School of Law A review of a case where “…that a tax assessor’s opinion that the proposed power line would not change the assessed value of the property for tax purposes was incompetent and prejudicial…”An exerpt of the correspondence: “Late last year, New York’s highest court, the Court of Appeals, ruled that the owner of property adjacent to a utility’s high-power electrical transmission lines could seek damages for a decrease in the market value of the property caused by the fear that the power lines might cause cancer, even if such a fear was not medically or scientifically reasonable. That decision has already begun to change the outlook on electromagnetic field (EMF) litigation for utilities.”

Hearing Aids and Cell Phones October 6, 2006

Posted by healthyself in Amplified Signals, Amplitude, Bioeffects, Biological Dentistry, Biological Effects, Blogroll, Brainwave Interference, Buzzing, Cell Phones, Communication, Conversations, Cordless Phones, Decision Making, Distribution, Ear, Elderly, Electrical Pulses, Electromagnetic Communications, Electromagnetic Interference, Electromagnetic pollution, Electromagnetic waves, Electrosensitivity, Electrosmog, ELF, EMF Research, EMF's, EMR, Environment, Exposure, Frequencies, GHz, Government's role, Health related, Hearing, HF, High Frequencies, HOuseholds, Interdisciplinary, LF, Lifestyle, Long Term Health Risks, Low Frequencies, MCS, Men's Health, MHz, Microwave exposure, mobile telephones, Neural Electrophysiology, Noise, Public Policy, Pulsed Radiation, Pulses, radiation, Radio Waves, Radios, Research Needed, Risk of Disease, Safety, Sound, Static, Toxic Interactions, Who is Affected?, Wireless Phones, Women's Health.
2 comments

Advice for People with Hearing Aids or Implanted Hearing Devices

“Before you buy a cell phone, you should try different brands and models to see which phone works best for you…People who wear hearing aids or have implanted hearing devices may experience some difficulties when trying to use cell phones. Some cell phones cause radio frequency interference with hearing aids, so the user hears high-pitched whistling sounds, buzzes, or static.”

“Fortunately, both cell phones and hearing aids are improving. Some phones have lower radio frequency (RF) emissions or different technology that can reduce the unwanted effects on hearing aids….”

“…On July 10, 2003, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) modified the exemption for wireless phones under the Hearing Aid Compatibility Act of 1988. This means that the FCC will require cell phone makers to produce several models that are designed to be compatible with hearing aids.”

http://www.fda.gov/cellphones/hearingaids.html

Do You Want to be Part Machine or Part Implanted Cell Phone? Please Vote. October 6, 2006

Posted by healthyself in Animal Research, Beneficial frequencies, Bioeffects, Biological Effects, Blogroll, Brainwave Interference, Buzzing, Cell phone industry, Cell phone safety, Cell Phones, Children's health, Cordless Phones, Electrical Components, Electrical Pulses, Electrical Surges, Electrical Wiring, Electromagetic pollution, Electromagnetic Communications, Electromagnetic Field, Electromagnetic Interference, Electromagnetic pollution, Electromagnetic waves, EMF's, EMR, Encoding, Environment, Exposure, Frequencies, Hand Portables, Handheld Units, Health related, HOuseholds, Integrative Medicine, Legal Issues, Lifestyle, Long Term Health Risks, Medical Research, Men's Health, MHz, Microwave exposure, Military, mobile telephones, Penetration, People in Laboratories, Police Officers, pressure, Pulsed Radiation, Pulses, Research Needed, Sleep disturbances.
add a comment

“In-your-face Interface

Wrap your head around this:

As technology gets smaller, faster, more futuristic, imagine yourself connected to a device that doesn’t just lamely hang on your ear but invades your skull. Not yet. Soon…. This trend is more than just folks looking like something off the Star Trek set. It is, say some academics, cultural critics and industry analysts, the latest of inevitable steps in the blurring of the line between man and machine…”I like machines a lot better than humans,”…businessman said before flying home….”I just have to interface with humans to do business.”….….sometimes falls asleep with the thing (Bluetooth) still on his ear….”Once you start,” he said, “you don’t go back.” Now it’s on us. Clinging like a caterpillar to our cartilage. When, then, will it be in us?” Some still scoff at the idea of Borglike implants. But plenty of others say it’s inevitable. Even coming soon.” “This gets into the question not so much what we’re going to be capable of; it’s more a question of what we as a species decide we want,” “… “This is a conversation about what it means to be human.” “We call it the Bluetooth ecosystem….”We…believe everything in a consumer’s life revolves around their cell phone.”…they can be synched with you.”… “We’re going to wind up in essence with ‘intelligent earrings,…”The size is going to continue to decrease until it disappears,”…And then . . . “the next step” and “a relatively minor one.”…” they’ll go internal pretty soon,”"Not in a matter of months. But maybe five or 10 years from now.” A cyborg is a human with robotic enhancements. Some people are cyborgs already…”We’re moving inside” the body with cell phones…a bioethicist and sociologist …”My opinion is it is realistic. But for at least a couple of decades, I don’t think it’s going to be terribly attractive to open up our heads.”….the man in the airport, said he wanted anything that would make him more efficient - except that….”I’m interested in what this means for the future of humans,” ….Not off in the distant future - in the next two, three, 10, 15 years, in our lifetimes and those of our children.” “It’s not about the little piece of plastic,” he said. “It’s about thefuture of human connection.”

Michael Kruse can be reached at mkruse@sptimes.com or 352 848-1434.

© Copyright, St. Petersburg Times. All rights reserved.

 

http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/sptimes/access/1141156841.html?dids=1141156841:1141156841&FMT=FT&FMTS=ABS:FT&date=Oct+5%2C+2006&author=MICHAEL+KRUSE&pub=St.+Petersburg+Times&edition=&startpage=1.E&desc=In-your-face+interface

Court Victory About Cell Phone Damage October 5, 2006

Posted by healthyself in Animal Research, Bioeffects, Biological Effects, Blogroll, Brain, Brain Cancer, Brainwave Interference, Cancer, Cell phone industry, Cell phone safety, Cell Phones, Cells, Children's health, Chronic Illness, Communication, Computer Rooms, Conversations, Death, Decision Making, Electrical Components, Electrical Pulses, Electrical Surges, Electromagetic pollution, Electromagnetic Communications, Electromagnetic pollution, Electromagnetic waves, Electrosensitivity, Electrosmog, ELF, Emergency Medicine, EMF Research, EMF's, Employees, EMR, Environment, Epidemiologists, Epilepsy, Financial Considerations, Frequencies, Games and Gaming, GHz, Hand Portables, Handheld Units, Healing, Health related, HOuseholds, Integrative Medicine, Internet, Legal Issues, Lifestyle, Long Term Health Risks, Low Frequencies, MHz, Microwave exposure, Migraines, Mobile Music, mobile telephones, Motor Activity, MS, nerves, Networks, Neural Electrophysiology, Neurasthenia, neurological, neuroma, neurons, neurosurgeons, Neurotransmitters, Non-Thermal Levels, Parenting, Penetration, People in Laboratories, Politics, Pulsed Radiation, Pulses, radiation, Radio Waves, Radios, Research, Research Needed, Risk Factor, Risk of Disease, Seizure, Stress, Symptoms, Teenagers, Telecommunications, Toxin, transmission, Tumors, Waves, Who is Affected?, WiFi, Wireless Phones, Women's Health, Workplace.
add a comment

Court victory is a first for cell-phone programmers

“……[she] thought it was just another in a series of sinus infections. Her head and eyes hurt, and she was vomiting. But then Price had a seizure, and a brain scan found something far more troubling….the phone was ringing. It was the doctor’s office, … `Brace yourself. Honey, you have a brain tumor.’ “

“After her diagnosis in 1999 and surgery to remove most of the tumor, [she] started looking for answers…. convinced that exposure to radio-frequency radiation on the job, where she programmed cell phones for new customers, had caused the tumor.”…an administrative law judge who handles worker’s compensation claims awarded her $30,000 to pay her medical bills and other expenses. [She] may be the first person to convince a judge that her illness was caused by radio-frequency radiation….when she filed a workers comp claim, her boss fired her, eliminating her health insurance. Then she lost the case. The Native American single mother of two daughters was devastated. She turned to Tribal Health, a government health agency for Native Americans, to get anti-seizure medication.””…If I hadn’t been Indian, I would have died,” she said.”

“After Price recovered from brain surgery, she went to the Internet and found researchers studying the biological effects of radio-frequency radiation, and got to know them.”

“I would call them up and say, `You are absolutely dead on. If a rat could talk, this is what it would say. I’m the human rat.’ “

“[She] couldn’t find an attorney to take her case until she contacted … a semi-retired lawyer and president of the Wireless Consumers Alliance, a California-based consumer-advocacy group…[who] volunteered to represent her pro bono and re-filed her workers comp case….

“It’s not a money issue, suing the company, it’s a health and safety issue,” … [she] speaks to school assemblies and classes…

@sun-sentinel.com or 954-356-4593.

Written by Nancy McVicar, who can be reached at nmcvicar@sun-sentinel.com or 954-356-4593.
http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/health/sfl-otumor02oct02,0,1963897.story

How Much of a Particular Frequency Can a Body Handle? October 4, 2006

Posted by healthyself in Biological Activity, Biological Effects, Blogroll, Cell phone industry, Cell phone safety, Conversations, Cordless Phones, Electrical Pulses, Electrochemical, Electromagetic pollution, Electromagnetic Communications, Electromagnetic Interference, Electromagnetic pollution, Electromagnetic waves, Electrosensitivity, Electrosmog, ELF, EMF Research, EMF's, EMR, Environment, Exposure, Frequencies, Health related, HF, High Frequencies, HOuseholds, Hz, Lack of Concentration, Lifestyle, Long Term Health Risks, Men's Health, MHz, Microwave exposure, mobile telephones, Pulsed Radiation, Pulses, radiation, Radio Waves, Radios, Research Needed, Risk of Disease, Stress, transmission, UHF, Who is Affected?, WiFi, Wireless Phones, Women's Health, Workplace.
add a comment

“Mesmerized by magical gadgets, we have yet to count the costs of miniature radio transmitters that are transforming Marconi’s invention into new possibilities for portable personal pollution. As entire nations reach for pocket communicators, the explosively emergent $40 billion a year cell phone industry is poised to deliver a “Wireless Revolution” that over the next five years is expected to double the one-billion people connected by telephone lines over the past century.”
“Silicon sensors are already calling to each other. Soon, countless communicating microchips embedded in everything from bumpers to brooms will be sending streams of encoded electrical energy through glass, steel, concrete, bone and flesh. Exquisitely sensitive to subtle electromagnetic harmonies, human brains and bodies as intricate as galaxies depend on tiny electrical impulses to conduct complex life-processes ­ including the ability to read, recall and respond to these words. Acting as antennas, our anatomies just as easily tune into spurious signals from radio and microwave transmissions. Blake Levitt, author of Electromagnetic Fields, says that when it comes to cellphones, “a worse frequency could not have been chosen for the human anatomy.”

http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/chris/2005/02/15/grave_cell_phone_dangers_revealed.htm

What is a Negative, or Positive, Frequency? October 2, 2006

Posted by healthyself in Blogroll, Cell phone safety, Definitions, Electrical Wiring, Frequencies, Hz, MHz, Radians, rotation, transmission.
add a comment

“The concept of negative and positive frequency can be as simple as a wheel rotating one way or the other way. A signed value of frequency indicates both the rate and direction of rotation. The rate is expressed in units such as revolutions (aka cycles) per second (hertz) or radians/second (where 1 cycle corresponds to 2π radians). By convention, a positive frequency is associated with rotation in the counterclockwise direction, whereas a negative frequency represents rotation in the clockwise direction.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_frequency