jump to navigation

Did you know…………… January 11, 2008

Posted by healthyself in Absorption, Accelerated Aging, Addiction, Adolescents, Aging, airports, Alzheimer's, Anger, angst, Antioxidants, Anxiety, arteriosclerosis, Attention Deficit, Autism / Asperger's, Biofield, Biological Activity, Biological Dentistry, Birth Defects, Birth Rate, Blogroll, Blood Brain Barrier, Bluetooth, Brain Cancer, Brain Damage, Brain Tumors, Brainwave Interference, Breast Cancer, Bronchial Spasms, Buzzing, Canaries, Cancer, Cancer Protection, Captive Animals, Cell changes, Cell death, Cell Masts, cell membrane, Cell phone industry, Cell Phone Pulses, Cell phone safety, Cell phone towers, Cell Phone Transmissions, Cell Phones, Cellular Damage, Cellular Destruction, cellular functions, Cellular Phone Frequencies, Central Nervous System, Childhood Cancer, Children's health, Chromosomal damage, Chronic Exhaustion, Chronic Fatigue, Chronic Illness, Circulation, Computer Rooms, Consciousness, Control Group, Conversations, Cordless Phones, Cytotoxic Effects, Dangerous, Death Rates, Definitions, Denial of Risk, Dental Fillings, Detoxification, Digestion, Diseases, Disruption of cellular, DNA, DNA breakage, DNA Damage, Dolphins, Double Strand DNA breakage, Ear Tumors, EEG, EHF, Elderly, Electric Field, Electrical Components, Electrical Pulses, Electrical Wiring, Electrochemical Communications, electromagnetic, Electromagnetic Communications, Electromagnetic Field, Electromagnetic Interference, Electromagnetic Radiation, Electromagnetic Signals, Electrophysiology, Electrosensitivity, Electrosmog, ELF, Emergency Medicine, EMF Exposure, EMF Research, EMF Shielding, EMF's, EMF-induced effects, EMR, Endocrine, Endogenous Fields, Entrainment, Entropy, Environment, Epidemiologists, Epidemiology, Extremely Low Frequency, Eye Cancer, Family, Fatigue, Federal Communication Commission, Forgetfulness, Free Radicals, Frequencies, Games and Gaming, Gamma Rays, Generations, genes, genetic damage, GHz, Global Health Disaster, Ground Currents, Grounding Conductors, GSM, Hand Portables, Handheld Units, Handsets, Harmonics, Hazard, headaches, Headsets, Healing, Health, Health and Safety Officer, Health related, Health Risk, Health Risks, Health warnings, Hearing, Heart Attacks, Heart Disease, heat, Heavy Metals, Heightened Risk, HF, Hidden, High Voltage Power Line, Homes, Hormones, Hospitals, HOuseholds, HRD, Human Biological Experiment, Human Populations, Human Resources, Hz, Illness, immune and nervous funtions, Immune system, Immunity, Infant Death Syndrome, Infectious Disease, Inflammation, Infrared, Inherited, Inner Agitation, Insects, Insomnia, Interdisciplinary, International, Intuition, Investigate, Lab Tested, Lack of Concentration, Laptops, Learning, Leukemia, LF, Lifestyle, Lifetime, Light, Long Term Health Effects, Long Term Health Risks, Low Birth Weight, Low Frequencies, Lung Disorders, Lymphoma, Mad Wave Disease, Magnetic Field Exposure, Malignant, masts, Medical Research, Medicine, Melatonin, Memory, Memory Loss, Men's Health, Menstrual Cycle, Metabolic Changes, Metabolism, MHz, microchips, Microwave exposure, Microwave Ovens, Microwave Sickness, microwaves, Migraines, Military, miscarriages, Mitigation, Mitochondria, Mobile Phone Transmissions, mobile telephones, Mold, Moods, Motivation, Motor Activity, nausea, nerves, Nervous System, Neural Electrophysiology, Neurasthenia, neurological, Neurologist, neuroma, neurons, neurosurgeons, Neurotransmitters, Noise, Non-Thermal Levels, Nutrition, Occupation, Ocular, oncogenes, Optical, Oscillate, Ovaries, Pain, Pain Perception, Panic Attacks, Paralysis, Parotid Gland, Patients, Peak Absorption, Penetration, People in Laboratories, Perinatal Depressio, Permanent Brain Damage, Pesticides, Pets, PH, Phone mast, Photosensitive, Pineal Gland, plasma membrane, Poisons, Police Officers, Politics, Pollution, Potential Hydrogen, Power Densities, Power poles, Pregnant Women, Preventive Caution, Prolonged calls, Prolonged Periods, Public areas, Public Hearings, Public Policy, Quantum Physics, Questionnaires, QV, radiation, Radio Field Sickness, Radio Frequency Microwaves, Radio Frequency Radiation, Radio Transmitters, Radio Waves, Rapidly pulsing, Recommendations, Recovery, Research, Research Needed, Resonance, Resonant Frequency, Resources, Right Side of the Head, ringing, ringtones, Risk Factor, Risk of Cancer, Risk of Disease, Safe Levels, Safety, Safety Barrier, SAR, Scalar Wave, School administrators, School Boards, Schools, Seizure, Sensitivity, Serotonin, Shielding, Shields, Sick People, signaling enzymes, signaling systems, Signals, Skull, Sleep, Sleep Disorders, Sleep disturbances, Solutions, Sound, Sparrows, Speakerphones, Species-Limiting, Spine, Staph, Stress, Stroke, Studies, subcellular structures, Subtle Energies, Suffering, Suicide, Susceptibility to Infection, Switched On, Symptoms, T3-T4, Teachers, teeth grinding, Telecommunications, telemetry interference, Terrain, terrorism, Tinnitus, Tissues, Toxic Interactions, toxic particles, toxicity, Toxin, Traffic Pollution, Transmitter Towers, TSH, tumorigenesis, Tumors, Tweenies, University, University Research, Unsafe, VDT, Violence, Well-Being, Whales, Who is Affected?, WiFi, Wireless, Wireless Phones, Wireless Revolution, Wireless Transmitter, Withdrawal, Women's Health, Workplace, X bearing sperm, X-Rays, zinging/crackling.
2 comments

The largest study ever done on wireless safety, which involved over 220 scientists around the world, demonstrated clinical evidence of double strand DNA breakage caused by cell phone radiation…..proved double strand DNA breakage along with altered gene mutation as well. … Swedish neurologist … who has been doing research studies for over 15 years, has verbalized about cell phone radiation, “This is the largest human biological experiment in the history of civilization”.

….a highly respected scientist, found shocking penetration rates of radiation in children as compared to adults. These differences in exposure signify potentially serious health risks for children in the area of cancer, genetic damage, disruptions of cellular, immune and nervous system functions. Scientists say that the thickness of the skull in children makes a difference. It is quite thin compared with adults, and there is more brain fluid – which means that the radio frequencies can travel through the brain more easily .


The BEFORE photo: Only 15 minutes use of a cell phone can create significant heating of tissues in the head. The orange, red and pink colors indicate the areas being heated.

The AFTER photo was taken after 15 minutes of using the same cell phone NOW protected with BIOPRO harmonization technology! Tissue temperatures remained normal! (Blue and green indicate coolness!)

Testing Details: The testing Protocol followed the IACT… guidelines….digital infrared imaging was performed …. The thermal window used was 10 degrees Celcius with each color on the color bar representing 1 degree Celcius. The ambient room temperature remained at 20 degrees Celcius throughout the test. A 15 minute equilibration period was used. The purpose of the testing was to determine if there is a change in infrared emission of the body part near a cellular phone with and without the BIOPRO EMF-Harmonization Chips in place.

Live Blood Analysis


Control blood test of human Blood test of human subject exposed to Blood test of human subject exposed to cell phone
subject not exposed to cell cell phone radiation without any protection radiation with Cell Chip protection
phone radiation

Live Blood Analysis, EEG Brainwave and other tests prove conclusively the new revolutionary Cell Chip with the breakthrough patented Noise-field Technology and ERT effectively neutralizes the harmful effects of radiation from your cell phone.

HOW WILL YOU PROTECT YOUR FAMILY FROM ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION?

There is a simple, cost-effective, scientifically-validated way to make all of our wonderful electronic conveniences safe for you, your family, and your pets.

Unprotected exposure to EMF radiation has been shown to interfere with sleep, make you irritable, effect your concentration while driving, prematurely age and wrinkle your skin, make your children jittery and restless, make you gain weight, make you tired during the day, and decrease focus and attention, among other things.

BioPro Products energize you, keep you looking great, relieve stress, help you sleep better, and make you smile all day long. You will look younger, feel better, and smile more!

Get yours at: http://mybiopro.com/Products.aspx?ID=vibrantenergy



Cell chip Universal chip Bio Life Pendant Home Harmonizer SMART card iWater Energitically charged “ingestibles”

KEEP YOUR VISION

40 studies and proof at http://www.bioenergeticsinstitute.com

Many national and international organizations have recognized the need to define the true risk of low intensity, non-thermal RF/MW radiation exposure, calling for intensive scientific investigation to answer the open questions. These include:

  • The World Health Organization, noting reports of “cancer, reduced fertility, memory loss, and adverse changes in the behavior and development of children.”
  • Journal of American Medical Association, “talking 500 minutes per month increases the probability of brain cancer by 140%”
  • Reproductive Research Center at Cleveland Clinic, “men who carry their mobiles near the groin on a belt or in a pocket could potentially have their sperm count reduced by as much as 30 %”, also citing that less than 20 % of the sperm looked normal under the microscope.
  • Stewart Inquiry U.K. “Young people under the age of 16 are strongly advised to use mobile phones for essential purposes only and to keep those calls short”

Day in and day out, you may be exposing yourself to more stress than you thought by simply using your Cell Phone, PDA or Bluetooth headset, computers, laptops, and other devices. Electromagnetic radiation (EMR) emitted from these devices has been linked to various stress-induced problems and illnesses and could very well be compromising your health and well being. As a leader in the field of bioenergetics, BIOPRO’s suite of products are the most advanced dual action technology designed to significantly address this newest source of stress in our daily lives.

BIOPRO’s suite of products combine the benefits of two powerful, innovative and scientifically substantiated technologies: BIOPRO’s patented noise field nano-technology MRET (Molecular Resonance Effect Technology), and its proprietary subtle energy innovation ERT (Energy Resonance Technology). Individually and collectively, these cutting-edge technologies offer a groundbreaking and effective way to deal with the cumulative stress associated with living in today’s electronic environment.

Put stress on hold today and enjoy the conveniences of modern life with the one-and-only suite of synergistic products.

HOW DO THEY WORK?

Everyone who uses wireless devices or spends time in areas where other people use wireless technology needs intervention. Radio waves coming from these devices trigger responses that lead to effects ranging from anxiety disorders, learning problems, and electrosensitivity to immunological deficiencies and cancer.

Doctors have told us that the MRET and ERT technologies are a very effective combined intervention because MRET emits a field that prevents biological tissue from reacting. ERT minimizes the symptoms by restoring cellular communication. This combined intervention represents the most efficient means of controlling this radio wave damage available anywhere in the world.

HOW DO YOU KNOW THEY WORK?

This patented, nano-technology has been scientifically tested and proven in laboratories at leading medical centers and universities around the world! Here is a list of some of them:

Cedar-Sinai Medical Center (Los Angeles)

University of Washington (Seattle)

Catholic University of America

University of Western Ontario (Canada)

Columbus University

Aarhus University (Denmark)

Elixir Health Ltd., Singapore

SI Biomedical Instrumentation Co., San Diego

University of Toronto, Canada

Tex Chu Corp. Laboratory, Taipei, Taiwan

Research Institute of Bioenergetics, USA

RF Exposure Laboratory, USA

Elys Scientific Corp., St. Petersburg, Russia

Advertisements

Are You Healthy? November 14, 2007

Posted by healthyself in Agriculture, Antioxidants, Blogroll, Cancer Protection, Children's health, Chronic Illness, Environment, Family, Health, Health and Wellness Products, Immune system, Men's Health, Women's Health.
add a comment

http://mybiopro.com/BioProTemplate.aspx?ItemID=1094&ID=vibrantenergy

We need to protect our bodies, especially our the cells and cell membranes.

Would You Put YOUR Kids At Risk? April 2, 2007

Posted by healthyself in Adolescents, Autism, Autism / Asperger's, Bioeffects, Biological Activity, Biological Effects, Blogroll, Brain Cancer, Cell changes, Cell Masts, cell membrane, Cell phone safety, Cell Phones, Cells, Children, Children's health, Chromosomal damage, Cordless Phones, Decision Making, Electromagnetic Communications, Electromagnetic Interference, Electromagnetic pollution, Electromagnetic Radiation, Electrosensitivity, Electrosmog, EMF Research, EMF's, EMR, Environment, Epidemiologists, Epidemiology, Exposure, Family, HOuseholds, Kids, Lifestyle, Long Term Health Risks, mobile telephones, Parenting, Pregnant Women, Research, Research Needed, Risk Factor, Risk of Disease, School administrators, School Boards, Schools, Teenagers, Tumors, Tweenies, Who is Affected?, Wireless Phones, Women's Health.
1 comment so far

“MOBILES’ PUT KIDS AT RISK OF AUTISM AND BRAIN TUMOURS’ Dr. Gerd Oberfield…gave a superbly clear and sombering presentation of the health dangers from these sources [at a recent conference]….”Parents who give their children mobile phones are ‘tempting fate’ and exposing them to a raft of potential health problems from brain tumors to autism” … “a new study “shows a link between electromagnetic radiation from mobile phones and masts and autism…[A scientist is asking] “parents not to give children under the age of 12 mobile phones as their DNA and cell membranes are especially vulnerable.”

http://omega.twoday.net/stories/3360329/

Should Cell Masts Be Allowed Near Schools or Homes? December 15, 2006

Posted by healthyself in Aging, Bioeffects, Biological Effects, Blogroll, Cancer, Cancer Protection, Cell phone industry, Cell phone safety, Cell phone towers, Cell Phones, Children's health, Conversations, Cordless Phones, Decision Making, Elderly, Electromagetic pollution, Electromagnetic Communications, Electromagnetic Interference, Electromagnetic pollution, Electromagnetic Radiation, Electromagnetic waves, Electrosensitivity, Electrosmog, ELF, EMF Research, EMF's, Environment, Exposure, Family, Frequencies, Government's role, Health, Health related, Homes, Legal Issues, Long Term Health Risks, Men', Men's Health, Microwave exposure, mobile telephones, Public Policy, Pulsed Radiation, Pulses, Research Needed, School administrators, School Boards, Schools, Stress, Who is Affected?, Wireless Phones, Women's Health, Workplace.
1 comment so far

A cancer expert has warned that a mobile phone mast that has contributed to 27 deaths and illnesses in 13 years was evidence to show masts should not be built near homes or schools.”

”Norwich North MP Ian Gibson has been a supporter of the Evening News Put Masts On Hold campaign, which calls for an end to masts being installed near homes and schools until there is conclusive proof that they pose no health risk.”

”Mr Gibson said it was essential that more research was carried out into the safety implications of such equipment after reports in national newspapers told of two estates where families said masts caused ill health. In Shooters Hill, Stoke-on-Trent, there have been seven deaths and 20 illnesses since phone giant Orange put up a mast in 1993.”

”Four people died of brain haemorrhages within three years of each other, while three others died from cancer. Another newspaper reported on a block of flats in Bristol where the cancer rate is 10 times that of the rest of the UK.”

“Orange said its masts were safe and cited a factsheet from the World Health Organisation which said there was no adverse or long-term health effects from that kind of low-level frequency.”

”The cases have parallels with a road in the city where eight people in one road near a mast had cancer. “

”Families living in Furze Road, Thorpe St Andrew, believed their cancers had been caused by a huge mobile phone base station which towers over their homes.”

’Betty Chaplin, 80, who moved into Furze Road near the St Williams Way mast in 1998 and within months developed cancer in her small intestine which required an operation, said there should be more research done into the correlation.”

“I think there must be a link,” she said. “As soon as I moved into this house I developed bowel cancer but I was operated on and was alright.”

Last year the Government’s chief advisor on mobile phone safety Sir William Stewart called for a precautionary ban on putting masts near schools and homes.”

”Dr Gibson said: “These latest cases seem to confirm that Sir William Stewart’s precautionary approach is the right one.”

”Are you fighting a mobile phone mast application where you live? Or do you think a mobile phone mast has made you ill? Call Peter Walsh on 01603 772439 or e-mail peter.walsh @archant.co.uk”

By DAN GRIMMER
05 December 2006 10:30

Copyright © 2006 Archant Regional. All rights reserved.

http://omega.twoday.net/stories/3026302

Grave cell phone danger—pay attention to this! December 2, 2006

Posted by healthyself in 217 Hz, ADD, Addiction, ADHD, Adolescents, Aging, Allergies, ALS, Alzheimer's, angst, Antennas, Anxiety, arteriosclerosis, Attention, Attention Deficit, Autism / Asperger's, Bioeffects, Biological Activity, Biological Effects, Bioscalar Energy, Birth Defects, Blogroll, Blood Brain Barrier, Blood Pressure, Brain, Brain Cancer, Brainwave Interference, Breast Cancer, Cancer, Cardiac Problems, Cell changes, Cell death, cell membrane, Cell phone safety, Cell phone towers, Cell Phones, Cells, Cellular Morphology, Central Nervous System, Childhood Leukemia, Children, Children's health, Chromosomal damage, Chronic Exhaustion, Chronic Fatigue, Chronic Illness, Circadian rhythms, Circulation, Coherence, Communication, Community, Concentration, Connective Tissue Pains, Conversations, Cordless Phones, Cytotoxic Effects, Death, Dementia, Depression, Diagnostic marker, Digital, Dizziness, DNA, Dopamine, Ear, ear ache, earphones, EEG, Elderly, Electrical Components, Electrical Pulses, Electrical Surges, Electrical Wiring, Electrochemical, electromagnetic, Electromagnetic Communications, Electromagnetic Field, Electromagnetic Interference, Electromagnetic pollution, Electromagnetic Radiation, Electromagnetic waves, Electrosensitivity, Electrosmog, ELF, Emergency Medicine, EMF Research, EMF's, Employees, EMR, Endogenous Fields, Energy, Environment, Epidemiologists, Epidemiology, Epilepsy, Exposure, Eye Cancer, Eyes, Family, Fatigue, Fiber Optic, Flickering, Free Radicals, Frequencies, Games and Gaming, genes, genetic damage, grams of tissue, Hand Portables, Handheld Units, Harmonics, headaches, Healing, Health, Health related, Hearing, Heart, Heart Disease, heat, Heavy Metals, HF, High Frequencies, high voltage transmission lines, Hormones, HOuseholds, HRD, Human Resources, Humor, Imbalances, Immune system, Inflammation, Infrared, Inner Agitation, Insomnia, Integrative Medicine, Interdisciplinary, Internet, Intuition, Kids, Lack of Concentration, Learning, Legal Issues, LF, Lifestyle, Long Term Health Risks, Lymphoma, MCS, Medical Research, Medicine, Memory, Memory Loss, Men', Men's Health, Metabolic Changes, Metal Roofs, Microwave exposure, Migraines, Military, miscarriages, Mitigation, mobile telephones, Monitoring, Movement, nausea, nerves, Neural Electrophysiology, Neurasthenia, neurological, neuroma, neurons, neurosurgeons, Neurotransmitters, Noise, Non Profit Organizations, Non-Thermal Levels, Nutrition, oncogenes, Optical, Overtones, Pain, Pain Perception, Panic Attacks, Paralysis, Parenting, Penetration, People in Laboratories, Pets, Pineal Gland, Pregnant Women, pressure, Proteins, Public Policy, Pulsed Radiation, Pulses, radiation, Radio Frequency Radiation, Reaction Time, Research, Research Needed, ringing, ringtones, Risk Factor, Risk of Disease, Safe Levels, Safety, SAR, School administrators, School Boards, Schools, Seizure, sensations, Sick People, signaling enzymes, Sleep, Sleep disturbances, Stress, Symptoms, Teenagers, Telecommunications, Telephony, Tinnitus, Toxic Interactions, Traffic Pollution, Tumors, Tweenies, Unified Field, VDT, Vibrational Medicine, Who is Affected?, WiFi, Wireless Phones, Withdrawal, Women, Women's Health, Workplace, X-Rays, zinging/crackling.
20 comments

By: Will Thomas

Though intended for renovations, Chris Anderson would like all visitors to deposit their cellular phones in the cement mixer by his front door. This sounds excessive – until you step into Anderson’s orchard, where the pegged needle of a shrieking electromagnetic radiation (EMR) meter placed beside a connected cellphone still shows significant exposure 100 feet away.

Much to the chagrin of this certified EMR-mitigation specialist, every day some 300 million cell phone users are “reaching out and touching someone you love. Yourself, and anyone else within range of the microwaves emitted by your cell phone.”……Silicon sensors are already calling to each other. Soon, countless communicating microchips embedded in everything from bumpers to brooms will be sending streams of encoded electrical energy through glass, steel, concrete, bone and flesh. Exquisitely sensitive to subtle electromagnetic harmonies, human brains and bodies as intricate as galaxies depend on tiny electrical impulses to conduct complex life-processes – including the ability to read, recall and respond to these words. Acting as antennas, our anatomies just as easily tune into spurious signals from radio and microwave transmissions. .

….”a worse frequency could not have been chosen for the human anatomy.”

As cell phones conquer consumer minds and markets, researcher Carolanne Patton notes that “the brain reaches peak absorption in the UHF bands, right where cellular telecommunications operate.” British military scientists have discovered that cellphone transmissions disrupt the brain sites for memory and learning, causing forgetfulness and sudden confusion.

Other studies show that electromagnetic signals from cellular phones reduce the ability to concentrate, calculate and coordinate complicated activities such as driving a car. Startled by $4 billion a year in extra claims among cellphone-wielding drivers, North American insurers did a double-take that found simply juggling `cell phones is not causing a 600% increase in accidents over other drivers busy shaving, applying makeup, tuning radios, taming pets, making out, pouring coffee, retrieving dropped cigarettes, talking and gesturing to passengers, or actually steering the vehicle….Instead of just another dangerous distraction, tests conducted by the U.S.Department of Energy found that using a cell phone severely impairs memory and reaction times. “Hands-free” mobile speaker-phones cause even more crashes because they typically emit 10-times more brainwave interference than handheld units.

For all drivers dialing out on their cell phones, University of Toronto investigators report that the heightened probability of cracking up your car persists for up to 15-minutes after completing a call. That’s comparable to the risk of crashing while driving dead drunk exclaims Dr. Chris Runball, chairman of the B.C. Medical Association’s emergency medical services committee. Reeling from “dial-a-collision” costs, the government of British Columbia may join England, Spain, Israel, Switzerland and Brazil in restricting or banning the use of cell phones by drivers.

In New Zealand, cellphone towers are prohibited on school property because of possible health effects.
But Health Canada regulations ignore the hidden hazards of cell-wrenching cellphones, which send pulsed signals through the skull in a process one expert likens to “jackhammers on the brain.”

…. cellphone addiction mirrors the prestigious early allure of smoking – as well as an immensely profitable industry’s steadfast denial of risk and responsibility. …Sir William Stewart told London’s Financial Times that “children may be more vulnerable because of their developing nervous system, the greater absorption of energy in the tissues of the head and a longer lifetime of exposure.”

…a Ph.D. biophysicist warns that headaches, fatigue, lethargy, nausea, dizziness, depression, arteriosclerosis and even Alzheimer’s can result from frequent or prolonged calls on cell phones.

“There is also a higher incidence of cardiac problems,” Cherry comments, “in terms of the timing function in hearts. You get more heart attacks and more heart disease – it has now been shown in many studies.”

…..cell phones can murderously modify moods. In brains and bodies seriously derailed by tiny imbalances in trace minerals and hormones, depression, suicide, anger, rage and violence can result when calcium and serotonin levels are disrupted by cellphone transmissions….
.
….DNA damage is passed on to succeeding generations.

….we forget how inconvenient it is to contract cancer. …B-cell lymphomas doubled in mice within 18 months of one-hour daily exposure to power densities experienced by a cellphone user. B-cell lymphomas are implicated in 85% of all cancers.

…Sleep disorders, she learned, are common among people exposed to high levels of electromagnetic pollution.

…there is nothing “safe” about the new 1.9 gigahertz broadcasting frequency. Much like a boxer taking repeated blows to the head, rapidly pulsing cellphones signal permanent brain damage. A study by Dr. Peter Franch found unequivocally that “cells are permanently damaged by cellular phone frequencies.” This cellular damage, Franch noted, is maximized at low dosage – and “inherited unchanged, from generation to generation.”

….the production of histamine, which triggers bronchial spasms, is nearly doubled after exposure to mobile phone transmissions. Cellphones also reduce the effectiveness of anti-asthmatic drugs, and retard recovery from illness.

…. 217 Hz spikes are very close to the frequencies of human cell membranes.

…..because cancer takes decades to develop, it will be another 10 or 20 years before “mobiles” manifest a big bonanza in brain tumors. But he adds, we’re already seeing “acute effects that are noticed within minutes of using a cell phone.”

After two minutes’ conversation, a cell phone’s digitized impulses disable the safety barrier that isolates the brain from destructive proteins and poisons in the blood.

…If you must pack a cell phone, treat it like a loaded pistol. Keep it turned off. Don’t carry it near ovaries, testicles, or the heart. For partial protection, buy an antenna shield. Limit calls to one-minute, six to 10 minutes a month. Never fire off a cellphone with children anywhere in sight.

A better bet is to facilitate the growth of organic telephone networks with lots of fibre. Instead of more microwave towers, “We should be wiring up our cities with fibre-optic cables to provide Internet, fax, telephone, radio and television at very high quality,” Cherry urges, “rather than saturating our cities with the microwave, radiowave and low frequency signals all the time.”

When it comes to cells, consciousness and cell phones, every call is collect. How can convenience count more than cancer? What is gained by being in constant contact with disembodied voices, while being “out of touch” with the friends and neighbours around us? Are we comfortable having our location traced by monitoring authorities?

Unless we start voting with our wallets, consumer complacency could prove as species-limiting as corporate cynicism.

“Microwave frequencies are the same as those used in radar and your microwave oven,” … “You wouldn’t think of sticking your head in the oven, but there is no hesitation to putting the cell phone to your ear.”

It’s worth reading this whole article…. put this in your url NOW:

http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/chris/2005/02/15/grave_cell_phone_dangers_revealed.htm

Fiber Optics and EMF’s October 22, 2006

Posted by healthyself in Amplified Signals, Amplitude, Cell phone safety, Cell Phones, Children's health, Conversations, Cordless Phones, Decision Making, Distribution, Electrical Components, Electrical Pulses, Electrical Surges, Electrical Wiring, Electrochemical, Electromagetic pollution, Electromagnetic Communications, Electromagnetic Field, Electromagnetic Interference, Electromagnetic pollution, Electromagnetic Radiation, Electromagnetic Spectrum, Electromagnetic waves, Electrosensitivity, Electrosmog, ELF, EMF Research, EMF's, EMR, Environment, Exposure, Family, Fiber Optic, Health related, HOuseholds, Lifestyle, Light, light beam, MCS, Men's Health, mobile telephones, Networks, Pulsed Radiation, Pulses, radiation, Radio Frequency Radiation, Radio Waves, Radios, Research, Research Needed, Safety, Solutions, Stress, Telecommunications, Telephony, transmission, Who is Affected?, Women's Health, Workplace.
5 comments

“No EMF or RF interference
The very nature of fiber optic transmission makes it virtually immune to electromagnetic and radio-frequency interference – and even lightning – which can be especially valuable in environments such as power-transmission or generating facilities, antenna or broadcast installations, or certain industrial environments.”

http://www.panasonic.com/business/security/fiberoptics.asp

‘Manageable’ fear a handy safety tool

i_9602b00.gif

‘As fiber optics continues to spread throughout broadband communication plants, and new fiber equipment is beginning to feature higher power outputs, many safety and training professionals in the industry are re-energizing their fiber optic training efforts. Kevin Wilkes, director of field services for Integration Technologies, says that while fiber optic technology continues to change, fiber optic safety issues have not. In fact, he believes new technology only underscores the importance of long-term safety training that needs a healthy dose of fear to succeed.

“I think probably 99 percent of the concerns about safety involving fiber have not changed with technology,” says Wilkes. “I think they’ve been amplified by higher launch powers and connectivity. But, the basis is still there for problems with the eyes.

“It’s pretty straightforward…. Of course, there are other things to worry about. But they’re pretty trivial compared to the eyes. You instill what I call ‘manageable’ fear. And, there’s nothing wrong with that at all. Because too much comfort breeds carelessness.”

http://www.cedmagazine.com/article/CA6261762.html

Advantages of Fiber Optic Systems

“Fiber optic transmission systems – a fiber optic transmitter and receiver, connected by fiber optic cable – offer a wide range of benefits not offered by traditional copper wire or coaxial cable. These include:1. The ability to carry much more information and deliver it with greater fidelity than either copper wire or coaxial cable.

2. Fiber optic cable can support much higher data rates, and at greater distances, than coaxial cable, making it ideal for transmission of  serial digital data.

3. The fiber is totally immune to virtually all kinds of interference, including lightning, and will not conduct electricity. It can therefore   come in direct contact with high voltage electrical equipment and power lines. It will also not create ground loops of any kind.

4. As the basic fiber is made of glass, it will not corrode and is unaffected by most chemicals. It can be buried directly in most kinds of  soil or exposed to most corrosive atmospheres in chemical plants without significant concern.

5. Since the only carrier in the fiber is light, there is no possibility of a spark from a broken fiber. Even in the most explosive of atmospheres, there is no fire hazard, and no danger of electrical shock to personnel repairing broken fibers.

6. Fiber optic cables are virtually unaffected by outdoor atmospheric conditions, allowing them to be lashed directly to telephone poles or existing electrical cables without concern for extraneous signal pickup.

7. A fiber optic cable, even one that contains many fibers, is usually much smaller and lighter in weight than a wire or coaxial cable with similar information carrying capacity. It is easier to handle and install, and uses less duct space. (It can frequently be installed without ducts.)

8. Fiber optic cable is ideal for secure communications systems because it is very difficult to tap but very easy to monitor. In addition, there is absolutely no electrical radiation from a fiber.”

http://www.commspecial.com/fiberguide-print.htm

Victims of Mast Radiation October 18, 2006

Posted by healthyself in Animal Research, Bioeffects, Biological Activity, Biological Dentistry, Biological Effects, Biomimetic, BioPhotons, Bioscalar Energy, Birth Defects, Blogroll, Brainwave Interference, Cell changes, Cell Cultures, Cell death, cell membrane, Cell phone industry, CFIDS, Children's health, Chromosomal damage, Chronic Exhaustion, Chronic Fatigue, Chronic Illness, Communication, Conversations, Cordless Phones, Cytotoxic Effects, Decision Making, Definitions, Diagnostic marker, Digital, DNA, EHF, Electrical Components, Electrical Pulses, Electrical Surges, Electrical Wiring, Electrochemical, Electromagetic pollution, electromagnetic, Electromagnetic Communications, Electromagnetic Field, Electromagnetic Interference, Electromagnetic pollution, Electromagnetic Spectrum, Electromagnetic waves, Electrosensitivity, Electrosmog, ELF, Emergency Medicine, EMF Research, EMF's, Employees, EMR, Environment, Epidemiologists, Epidemiology, Family, Financial Considerations, Frequencies, Funding, GHz, headaches, Health related, HF, High Frequencies, high voltage transmission lines, HOuseholds, HRD, Hz, Immune system, Integrative Medicine, Interdisciplinary, Lack of Concentration, Legal Issues, LF, Lifestyle, Long Term Health Risks, Low Frequencies, MCS, Medical Research, Medicine, Men's Health, MF, MHz, Microwave exposure, Migraines, mobile telephones, MS, Neural Electrophysiology, Non Profit Organizations, Public Policy, Pulsed Radiation, Quantum Physics, radiation, Research, Research Needed, Resonant Frequency, Risk Factor, Risk of Disease, SAR, School administrators, SHF, Sick People, Sleep disturbances, Telecommunications, Transformation, University, Waves, Women's Health.
3 comments

[There]..” is a website dedicated to a international community of people suffering adverse health effects from masts and antennas in the vicinity of their homes.

If you are a victim of mast radiation or strongly concerned about the issue, please write your story and share your thoughts on this website! Please click on “Tell your story” in the left hand menu and create an online case history file. You don’t need to register with this website to participate and no personal information will be recorded. You only give out as much information as you wish to.
You can also email your story to us at: story@mast-victims.org and we will put it online.

The purpose of this website is to bring together people from all over the world that have become victims of insensitive mast and antenna siting. Telecommunications companies are drowning us in radiation and they are in a state of complete denial on whether these masts and antennas have any negative health impact on the population. Credible scientific research shows that especially mobile phone mast radiation is harmful and people are suffering. Some people have even been forced to abandon their homes after becoming ill from radiation.

This has got to change. So far only few people have come forward against the telecommunication industry and those who have deserve to be known and heard.

http://www.mast-victims.org is built as a community where people living under the threat of masts and antennas can record their case histories and share their thoughts online.”

http://www.mast-victims.org/

Electromagnetic Fields of Household Appliances October 1, 2006

Posted by healthyself in 50 Hz, Bioeffects, Biological Effects, Blogroll, Buzzing, Cell phone safety, Computer Rooms, Digital, Electrical Components, Electrical Pulses, Electrical Surges, Electrochemical, Electromagetic pollution, Electromagnetic Communications, Electromagnetic Field, Electromagnetic Interference, Electromagnetic pollution, Electromagnetic waves, Electrosensitivity, Electrosmog, ELF, Emergency Medicine, EMF Research, EMF's, Employees, EMR, Environment, Family, Frequencies, Hand Portables, Handheld Units, Health related, HF, High Frequencies, high voltage transmission lines, HOuseholds, Hz, Internet, LF, Lifestyle, Light, Long Term Health Risks, Low Frequencies, Men's Health, MHz, Microwave exposure, mobile telephones, nerves, neurological, Parenting, Pulsed Radiation, Pulses, radiation, Radio Waves, Radios, Research Needed, Telecommunications, transmission, WiFi, Women's Health, Workplace.
1 comment so far

Electric appliances in the household
The strongest power frequency electric fields that are ordinarily encountered in the environment exist beneath high voltage transmission lines. In contrast, the strongest magnetic fields at power frequency are normally found very close to motors and other electrical appliances, as well as in specialized equipment such as magnetic resonance scanners used for medical imaging.

(Typical electric field strengths measured near household appliances
(at a distance of 30 cm)
(From: Federal Office for Radiation Safety, Germany 1999)

Electric appliance Electric field strength (V/m)
Stereo receiver 180
Iron 120
Refrigerator 120
Mixer 100
Toaster 80
Hair dryer 80
Colour TV 60
Coffee machine 60
Vacuum cleaner 50
Electric oven 8
Light bulb 5
Guideline limit value 5000

Many people are surprised when they become aware of the variety of magnetic field levels found near various appliances. The field strength does not depend on how large, complex, powerful or noisy the device is. Furthermore, even between apparently similar devices, the strength of the magnetic field may vary a lot. For example, while some hair dryers are surrounded by a very strong field, others hardly produce any magnetic field at all. These differences in magnetic field strength are related to product design. The following table shows typical values for a number of electrical devices commonly found in homes and workplaces. The measurements were taken in Germany and all of the appliances operate on electricity at a frequency of 50 Hz. It should be noted that the actual exposure levels vary considerably depending on the model of appliance and distance from it.

Typical magnetic field strength of household appliances at various distances

Electric appliance

3 cm distance (µT)

30 cm distance (µT)

1 m distance (µT)

Hair dryer

6 – 2000

0.01 – 7

0.01 – 0.03

Electric shaver

15 – 1500

0.08 – 9

0.01 – 0.03

Vacuum cleaner

200 – 800

2 – 20

0.13 – 2

Fluorescent light

40 – 400

0.5 – 2

0.02 – 0.25

Microwave oven

73 – 200

4 – 8

0.25 – 0.6

Portable radio

16 – 56

1

< 0.01

Electric oven

1 – 50

0.15 – 0.5

0.01 – 0.04

Washing machine

0.8 – 50

0.15 – 3

0.01 – 0.15

Iron

8 – 30

0.12 – 0.3

0.01 – 0.03

Dishwasher

3.5 – 20

0.6 – 3

0.07 – 0.3

Computer

0.5 – 30

< 0.01

Refrigerator

0.5 – 1.7

0.01 – 0.25

<0.01

Colour TV

2.5 – 50

0.04 – 2

0.01 – 0.15

With most household appliances the magnetic field strength at a distance of 30 cm is well below the guideline limit for the general public of 100 µT.

http://www.who.int/peh-emf/about/WhatisEMF/en/index3.html

Who’s in Charge of Cell Towers? September 24, 2006

Posted by healthyself in Blogroll, Cell phone industry, Cell phone safety, Cell phone towers, Cell Phones, Electrical Wiring, Electromagnetic Field, Electromagnetic pollution, Electromagnetic Spectrum, Electromagnetic waves, Electrosensitivity, Electrosmog, ELF, Emergency Medicine, EMF Research, EMF's, EMR, Environment, Exposure, Family, Frequencies, HOuseholds, Inner Agitation, Legal Issues, Lifestyle, Microwave exposure, mobile telephones, Public Policy, Pulsed Radiation, radiation, Waves.
1 comment so far

“If you do anything to your property, even put up a shed, you have to get a permit,” he said. “But you’re telling me nobody regulates a cell phone tower?”….

 

“Homeowners near the site didn’t know about it until Deborah Ernsberger answered a knock on her front door on a mid-summer afternoon. A representative of Firelands Electric Cooperative told her the company was going to run an electric line through her yard to power a tower that would be directly in front of her home.“”When he came home from work that day, Kenny Ernsberger was outraged not only by the tower’s location, but also by the electric co-op’s plans to cut down two trees in his front yard for the electric line. One is a white oak at least 80-feet tall, the other a 60-foot wild cherry.”

http://mansfieldnewsjournal.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060924/NEWS01/609240303/1002

Cell Phones Cause Excitability of the Brain Cells September 19, 2006

Posted by healthyself in Alzheimer's, Antennas, Beta Rhythm, Bioeffects, Biofield, Biological Activity, Biological Dentistry, Biological Effects, Blogroll, Brain, Brain Cancer, Cancer, Cancer Protection, Cell phone industry, Cell phone safety, Cell Phones, Central Nervous System, Community, Consciousness, Cordless Phones, Dementia, Digital, Electrical Surges, Electrochemical, electromagnetic, Electromagnetic Field, Electromagnetic pollution, Electromagnetic Spectrum, Electromagnetic waves, Electrosensitivity, Electrosmog, ELF, Emergency Medicine, EMF Research, EMF's, EMR, Environment, Epilepsy, Extra-Sensory Perception, Eye Cancer, Family, headaches, Health related, HOuseholds, Lifestyle, Long Term Health Risks, Men's Health, Microwave exposure, Migraines, Mitigation, Monitoring, nerves, neurological, Oscillate, pressure, Public Policy, Pulsed Radiation, Quantum Physics, radiation, Resonance, Resonant Frequency, Stroke, Tinnitus, Toxin, transmission, VDT, Vibration, Vibrational Medicine, Women's Health.
add a comment

“Cell phones appear to have a measurable physical impact on parts of your brain, new Italian research contends.”

Such an impact could possibly help if you suffer from migraines or other neurological disorders, the authors of a study published in the August issue of Annals of Neurology suggest.”

“And it could hurt if you have epilepsy or a brain disease.”

“Either way, the researchers and other experts caution, much more research needs to be done before any definitive conclusions can be drawn.”

“The researchers from Fatebenefratelli Hospital in Isola Tiberina, found that the electromagnetic field (EMF) emitted by cell phones can cause some cells in the brain’s cortex adjacent to the side of phone use to become excited, while others become inhibited.”

“They suggest that this could have beneficial effects for people with migraines, stroke or dementia, and possibly detrimental effects for those with epilepsy, the study authors suggested.”

“It should be argued that long-lasting and repeated exposure to EMFs linked with intense use of cellular phones in daily life might be harmful or beneficial in brain-diseased subjects. Further studies are needed to better circumstantiate these conditions and to provide safe rules for the use of this increasingly more widespread device,” the authors wrote.

“E. Roy John, director of New York University Medical Center’s Brain Research Laboratories, said, “Using a cell phone is not innocuous. It has an effect on your brain. Whether that’s good or bad, we don’t yet know, but it’s definitely having an effect.”….…for now, all that’s known for sure is that the EMF emitted by a cell phone can cause increased excitability in certain brain cells.

http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/news/fullstory_35328.html

While a certain frequency could possibly, accidentally, have a positive effect on someone with a particular malfunction, wouldn’t it be much better to apply such a treatment in a manner that is understood, known and given in the proper amount? We may not know enough about which frequencies help or hinder which processes; or if we do, the information is not being shared with the cell phone companies. It seems that companies are using any frequency that has been available for purchase, without really knowing the effects of that frequency on different kinds of people in different kinds of circumstances, such as distance, size of the skull, etc. This is not good medicine. Personally, I’d rather go to a neurologist than a cell phone company for “brain” treatment.