jump to navigation

Cell Phone Dangers April 12, 2007

Posted by healthyself in "Cellular" Relay Antennas, "No Fry Zone", 1.9 GHz, 217 Hz, Absorption, Accelerated Aging, Aging, Alzheimer's, Anatomy, Anger, Animal Research, Antennas, arteriosclerosis, Asthma, B-Cell Lymphomas, Biochemical, Bioeffects, Biological Activity, Biological Effects, Biophysicist, Birth Rate, Blogroll, Brain, Brain Cancer, Brain Damage, Brain Tumors, Bronchial Spasms, Calcium, Cancer, Captive Animals, Cardiac Problems, Cell changes, Cell Masts, cell membrane, Cell phone industry, Cell Phone Pulses, Cell phone safety, Cell phone towers, Cell Phone Transmissions, Cell Phones, Cellular Damage, Cellular Destruction, Cellular Phone Frequencies, Children, Children's health, Chromosomal damage, Chronic, Chronic Exhaustion, Chronic Fatigue, Chronic Illness, Church, Churches, Confusion, Consciousness, Cordless Phones, Cytotoxic Effects, Dangerous, Death, Death Rates, Denial of Risk, Diagnostic marker, Digital, Diseases, Dizziness, DNA, DNA Damage, Edginess, Effectiveness, Electrical Pulses, Electrochemical, Electrochemical Communications, Electromagnetic pollution, Electromagnetic Radiation, Electromagnetic Signals, Electromagnetic waves, Electrosensitivity, Electrosmog, ELF, Emergency Medicine, EMF Research, EMF's, Emissions, Employees, EMR, EMR meter, encoded electrical energy, Energy Spikes, Environment, Epidemiologists, Epidemiology, Exposure, Fatigue, Federal Communication Commission, Fiber Optic, Fibre-Optic, Forgetfulness, Frequencies, Generations, genetic damage, Global Health Disaster, Government's role, Harmonics, Hazard, headaches, Headsets, Health and Safety Officer, Health related, Health Risks, Health warnings, Heart, Heart Attacks, Heart Disease, Hidden, high voltage transmission lines, Histamine, Homes, HOuseholds, HRD, Human Populations, Human Resources, Hz, Illness, Immune system, Immunity, Infectious Disease, Inherited, Interdisciplinary, Lab Tested, Learning, lethality, Lethargy, LF, Lifestyle, Lifetime, Long Term Health Effects, Long Term Health Risks, Low Dosage, Low Frequencies, Maximum Output Level, Medical Research, Memory, Memory Loss, Men's Health, Menstrual Cycle, microchips, Microwave exposure, Microwave Ovens, microwaves, Mitigation, Mobile Phone Transmissions, mobile telephones, Molecules, Monitoring Authorities, Moods, MS, National Security, nausea, nerves, Nervous System, neurological, Neurologist, Ovaries, Parenting, Peak Absorption, People in Laboratories, Permanent Brain Damage, Pets, Politics, Pollution, Power Densities, Prolonged calls, Proteins, Public Hearings, Public Policy, Pulsed Radiation, Pulses, Radar, radiation, Radio Frequency Microwaves, Radio Frequency Radiation, Radio Transmitters, Radio Waves, Radios, Rage, Rapidly pulsing, Real Time, Recovery, Relay Towers, Research, Research Needed, Resonance, Resonant Frequency, Right Side of the Head, Risk Factor, Risk of Disease, Rooflines, Safe Levels, Safety, Safety Barrier, SAR, Scary, School administrators, School Boards, Schools, sensations, Serotonin, Shields, Silicon Sensors, Sleep, Sleep Disorders, Sleep disturbances, Species-Limiting, Spectrum Analyzer, Stand-by Mode, Standards, Steeples, Stress, Studies, Subtle Energies, Suicide, Switched On, Symptoms, Testicles, Tissues, Toxic Interactions, toxicity, Toxin, Transmitter Towers, Tumors, Twangs, UHF, Unsafe, Violence, Voting, White Blood Cells, Who is Affected?, Wireless, Wireless Phones, Wireless Revolution, Women's Health, Workplace, zapped.
5 comments

Grave Cell Phone Dangers Revealed

“Though intended for renovations, Chris Anderson would like all visitors to deposit their cellular phones in the cement mixer by his front door. This sounds excessive – until you step into Anderson’s orchard, where the pegged needle of a shrieking electromagnetic radiation (EMR) meter placed beside a connected cellphone still shows significant exposure 100 feet away.”

“Much to the chagrin of this certified EMR-mitigation specialist, every day some 300 million cell phone users are “reaching out and touching someone you love. Yourself, and anyone else within range of the microwaves emitted by your cell phone.”

“Mesmerized by magical gadgets, we have yet to count the costs of miniature radio transmitters that are transforming Marconi’s invention into new possibilities for portable personal pollution. As entire nations reach for pocket communicators, the explosively emergent $40 billion a year cell phone industry is poised to deliver a “Wireless Revolution” which, over the next five years, is expected to double the one-billion people connected by telephone lines over the past century.”

“Silicon sensors are already calling to each other. Soon, countless communicating microchips embedded in everything from bumpers to brooms will be sending streams of encoded electrical energy through glass, steel, concrete, bone and flesh. Exquisitely sensitive to subtle electromagnetic harmonies, human brains and bodies as intricate as galaxies depend on tiny electrical impulses to conduct complex life-processes – including the ability to read, recall and respond to these words. Acting as antennas, our anatomies just as easily tune into spurious signals from radio and microwave transmissions. Blake Levitt, author of Electromagnetic Fields, says that when it comes to cellphones, “a worse frequency could not have been chosen for the human anatomy.”

“As cell phones conquer consumer minds and markets, researcher Carolanne Patton notes that “the brain reaches peak absorption in the UHF bands, right where cellular telecommunications operate.” British military scientists have discovered that cellphone transmissions disrupt the brain sites for memory and learning, causing forgetfulness and sudden confusion.”
….”Instead of just another dangerous distraction, tests conducted by the U.S.Department of Energy found that using a cell phone severely impairs memory and reaction times. “Hands-free” mobile speaker-phones cause even more crashes because they typically emit 10-times more brainwave interference than handheld units.”….In New Zealand, cellphone towers are prohibited on school property because of possible health effects. But Health Canada regulations ignore the hidden hazards of cell-wrenching cellphones, which send pulsed signals through the skull in a process one expert likens to “jackhammers on the brain.” “Safety Code 6″ looks only at microwaves burning skin.” “Basically, Health Canada claims if it can’t cook you, it can’t hurt you,” says Walter McGinnis. “It’s like saying cigarettes aren’t dangerous unless they burn you.”

“One of a handful of licensed electricians who understand electromagnetic fields well enough to eliminate them from household wiring, McGinnis has been testing EMFs and collaborating with fellow testers and researchers for nearly a decade. In Victoria, where he has helped residents defeat six cellphone towers, there was dancing in the streets after Microcell Connexions withdrew its application to erect a microwave transmission tower against the Wishart Elementary School fence in the spring of 1998. Microcell spokesman Colin McCrae points out that emissions from the company’s towers carry about the same energy as a 50-watt lightbulb – well within federal guidelines.”

“This is hardly reassuring, retorts the former president of the Wisehart parents advisory council. Tania Berenuik observes that Health Canada “also told us thalidomide, asbestos and the blood supply were safe.” Carrying similar risks of long-term lethality, and strangely just as legal, cellphone addiction mirrors the prestigious early allure of smoking – as well as an immensely profitable industry’s steadfast denial of risk and responsibility. As poisonous as cigarette smoke and even harder to corral, the cellphone’s “second-hand” microwave and to bystanders – particularly children riding in cars that transmit amplified cellphone signals through their steel structure. Reporting the conclusions of a 12-person British study team, scientist Sir William Stewart told London’s Financial Times that “children may be more vulnerable because of their developing nervous system, the greater absorption of energy in the tissues of the head and a longer lifetime of exposure.”

“Roger Coghill became a long-standing advocate for health warnings to be affixed to cell phones after this biologist found that cellphone transmissions damage the ability of white blood cells to ward off infectious disease by disrupting the immune system’s electromagnetic communications. Dr. Neil Cherry has measured accelerated aging, increased cell death and cancers caused by radio frequency microwaves from cellphones and their relay towers. With the brain’s electro-chemical communications repeatedly zapped by lightning-like cellphone pulses, this Ph.D. biophysicist warns that headaches, fatigue, lethargy, nausea, dizziness, depression, arteriosclerosis and even Alzheimer’s can result from frequent or prolonged calls on cell phones.”

“There is also a higher incidence of cardiac problems,” Cherry comments, “in terms of the timing function in hearts. You get more heart attacks and more heart disease – it has now been shown in many studies.” The biophysicist from Lincoln University in Christ Church, New Zealand has also found that cell phones can murderously modify moods. In brains and bodies seriously derailed by tiny imbalances in trace minerals and hormones, depression, suicide, anger, rage and violence can result when calcium and serotonin levels are disrupted by cellphone transmissions.”

“In 1995, Cell phone sales in North America exceeded the birth rate. Hired by the Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association to condone cellphones, public health scientist George Carlo found that rare tumors on the outside of the brain are more than doubled among cell phone callers – particularly on the right side of the head where phones are usually held. Carlo told ABC’s “20/20” that cell phone causes genetic damage that leads to cancer. Warning of “the potential for a global health disaster,” ABC recommended “prudent avoidance” of cellphones after finding that every cellphone they lab-tested exceeded the Federal Communication Commission’s standards for EMF absorption rates. EMF researcher Dave Ashton cautioned 20/20 viewers that because cellphones constantly search for the nearest repeating tower, “long-term damage comes from cell phones in the stand-by mode.” Cell phone “shields” and headsets “cannot adequately address these problems,” Ashton added.”

“Dr. Carlo later told London’s Express newspaper that cellphones cause genetic damage following a dose-response curve. That is, the more a person uses a cell phone, the more cellular destruction and health risks they incur. Cell phone-confused cells can go crazy, Carlo cautioned. Experiments on captive animals show that this cumulative DNA damage is passed on to succeeding generations.”

“Addicted as we are to a culture of convenience, we forget how inconvenient it is to contract cancer. An Adelaide Hospital study confirmed Carlo’s conclusions after finding B-cell lymphomas doubled in mice within 18 months of one-hour daily exposure to power densities experienced by a cellphone user. B-cell lymphomas are implicated in 85% of all cancers.”

“Ready or Not As magazine-size “cellular” relay antennas hidden in church steeples and rooflines keep popping up just about everywhere, more and more communities are declaring their airspace a “No Fry Zone”. But in Canada, where cell phone towers come under federal jurisdiction, municipalities are only “advisers’ to a process in which no permits are required to erect transmitter towers deemed necessary for “national security.” Cellphones do save a lot of lives. FCC Chairman William Kennard reports that every day more than 98,000 people make 911 calls from wireless cell phones.”

“Many more lives are involuntarily imperiled by non-emergency calls. Pat Irwin was working in a Colwood health food store when she noticed a truck unloading metal framework. The next morning, a new cellphone tower was ready to add its emissions to another BC Tel tower already operating down the street. There had been no announcement, no public hearings – just a quiet notification to the municipality that a tower was going up, literally overnight.”

“The intruder radiated for a month when Irwin felt her immunity dropping. She wondered if other changes in her energy and menstrual cycle were “not from the moon or something that I ate.”

“Irwin also seemed more irritable after her central nervous switchboard began receiving round-the-clock cellphone calls. With cellular relay towers in Kansas and Oklahoma being shut down because they interfered with passing aircraft, Irwin sensed how the same transmissions plucked her own electrical circuitry, inflicting a “chronic edginess” that “twangs human nerves.” Sleep disorders, she learned, are common among people exposed to high levels of electromagnetic pollution.”

“After several other women in the same business centre reported similar symptoms, Irwin quit her job. “I saw it as something that was there to stay and I’d be daily exposed to it over a long period of time,” she told Alive. “All this stuff is what we’re playing with on a daily basis, and we don’t know the long-term health effects.”

“Implying recognized hazard, cell phone companies such as B.C.’s FIDO insist that the new digital phones operating at 1/50 the power of older analog models are safer. But there is nothing “safe” about the new 1.9 gigahertz broadcasting frequency. Much like a boxer taking repeated blows to the head, rapidly pulsing cellphones signal permanent brain damage. A study by Dr. Peter Franch found unequivocally that “cells are permanently damaged by cellular phone frequencies.” This cellular damage, Franch noted, is maximized at low dosage – and “inherited unchanged, from generation to generation.”

“Attempting to explain a 25% increase in asthma and a 5% increase in asthma-related death rates throughout rapidly “mobilizing” metropolitan Sydney, Franch found that the production of histamine, which triggers bronchial spasms, is nearly doubled after exposure to mobile phone transmissions. Cellphones also reduce the effectiveness of anti-asthmatic drugs, and retard recovery from illness.”

“Katharina Gustavss, a certified Building Biology consultant with 25 years experience, explains that CDMA’s 217 Hz spikes are very close to the frequencies of human cell membranes. Gustavss accompanied a Microcell technician to the Colwood microwave relay tower Irwin and others had complained about. When he waved a spectrum analyzer, Gustavss checked the display and saw “pretty scary” energy spikes. “What’s that?” she asked the tech. “I’ve never seen that before,” he told her. It turned out that this cellphone tower tester only set his meter to an averaging mode. Switching to “real time” froze the readings at “scary” maximum output levels.”

“How dangerous are cell phones? “The risk is extremely high,” declares Dr. Cherry. “There are 66 epidemiological studies showing that electromagnetic radiation across the spectrum increaseS brain tumors in human populations. Two of those studies are for particular brain tumors from cell phones.”

“Cherry says that because cancer takes decades to develop, it will be another 10 or 20 years before “mobiles” manifest a big bonanza in brain tumors. But he adds, we’re already seeing “acute effects that are noticed within minutes of using a cell phone.”

“After two minutes’ conversation, a cell phone’s digitized impulses disable the safety barrier that isolates the brain from destructive proteins and poisons in the blood. Professor Leif Salford, the neurologist who carried out the research for this finding, informed the Daily Mail: “It seems that molecules such as proteins and toxins can pass out of the blood, while the phone is switched on, and enter the brain. We need to bear in mind diseases such as MS and Alzheimer’s which are linked to proteins being found in the brain.”

“Dancing with the Telecomonster If you must pack a cell phone, treat it like a loaded pistol. Keep it turned off. Don’t carry it near ovaries, testicles, or the heart. For partial protection, buy an antenna shield. Limit calls to one-minute, six to 10 minutes a month. Never fire off a cellphone with children anywhere in sight.”

“A better bet is to facilitate the growth of organic telephone networks with lots of fibre. Instead of more microwave towers, “We should be wiring up our cities with fibre-optic cables to provide Internet, fax, telephone, radio and television at very high quality,” Cherry urges, “rather than saturating our cities with the microwave, radiowave and low frequency signals all the time.”

“When it comes to cells, consciousness and cell phones, every call is collect. How can convenience count more than cancer? What is gained by being in constant contact with disembodied voices, while being “out of touch” with the friends and neighbours around us? Are we comfortable having our location traced by monitoring authorities?”

“Unless we start voting with our wallets, consumer complacency could prove as species-limiting as corporate cynicism. “Microwave frequencies are the same as those used in radar and your microwave oven,” says Florida cellphone tower opponent Joe Chwick. “You wouldn’t think of sticking your head in the oven, but there is no hesitation to putting the cell phone to your ear.”

By: will thomas

Thursday, July 06, 2006

http://campaignfortruth.com/Eclub/210305/CTM%20-%20phone%20dangers%20revealed.htm

Churches and Cell Phone Jammers April 4, 2007

Posted by healthyself in Cell Phones, Churches, Decision Making, Electromagnetic Communications, Electromagnetic Field, Electromagnetic Interference, Electromagnetic pollution, Environment, jammers, Lifestyle, mobile telephones, Noise, Non Profit Organizations, Sound, Telecommunications, Who is Affected?, Wireless Phones.
add a comment

“It was the reporters who noticed first. Unable to call their editors while covering the weddings of the rich and famous, they asked the priest why their cell phones never worked at Sacred Heart. His reply: Israeli counterintelligence.”

“In four Monterrey churches, Israeli-made cell phone jammers the size of paperbacks have been tucked unobtrusively among paintings of the Madonna and statues of the saints.”

“The jarring polychromatic din of ringing cell phones is increasingly being thwarted — from religious sanctuaries to India’s parliament to Tokyo theaters and commuter trains — by devices originally developed to help security forces avert eavesdropping and thwart phone-triggered bombings.”

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6263292/

 

Camouflaged Cell Phone Towers September 13, 2006

Posted by healthyself in Aesthetics, Antennas, Bioeffects, Biological Effects, Blogroll, Boulders, Cacti, Cell phone industry, Cell phone safety, Cell phone towers, Cell Phones, Cemetaries, Chimneys, Church, Churches, Decision Making, Electromagnetic Field, Electromagnetic pollution, Electromagnetic waves, Electrosensitivity, Electrosmog, ELF, EMF Research, EMF's, EMR, Environment, Financial Considerations, Firehouse, Firehouses, Flagpoles, GHz, Government's role, Health related, Historic Buildings, HOuseholds, Hz, Island, Islands, Legal Issues, Lifestyle, Long Term Health Risks, Microwave exposure, mobile telephones, National Monuments, National Parks, Old Faithful, Old Stone Buildings, Parenting, Politics, Public Policy, Pulsed Radiation, radiation, Risk of Disease, School administrators, School Boards, School yards, Schools, State Park, State Parks, Toxin, transmission, Trees, Waves, Who is Affected?.
2 comments

“Former eyesores now blend into the landscape, but some say the structures are still nuisances.The next time you go on a hike, take a closer look at the surrounding trees. You might be surprised to discover that “tree” is actually a cellphone tower….Cellular phone towers can take any shape: tree, church steeple, chimney, flagpole, windmill, cactus, and even boulder…….”One of the major ways that a town can deny an antenna permit application is because of aesthetic appeal or property values,” said Libby Kelley, executive director of the Council on Wireless Technology Impacts….

…”In many cases today, cities will not allow carriers to install sites without some sort of concealment and then when they conceal it, it really expedites the zoning process,….Normally, getting a cell tower approved can take a year or more, but a disguised tower could shorten the process — possibly to just six months….once approved, it takes about 8 to 10 weeks to construct a tree pole.”

“Hidden towers have their drawbacks, however. Camouflaged towers can cost between $40,000 and $100,000 to produce, roughly 10 times more than normal towers…. the return costs to wireless carriers offset the expense.”

http://www.g4tv.com/techtvvault/features/35310/Cellphone_Towers_Transformed.html

EMF’s, Cell Phone Towers, and Aesthetics September 13, 2006

Posted by healthyself in Aesthetics, Antennas, Bioeffects, Biofield, Biological Effects, Blogroll, Cell phone industry, Cell phone safety, Cell phone towers, Cell Phones, Cemetaries, Children's health, Church, Churches, Cordless Phones, Electromagnetic Field, Electromagnetic pollution, Electromagnetic waves, Electrosensitivity, Electrosmog, ELF, EMF's, Employees, EMR, Environment, Exposure, Firehouse, Firehouses, Flagpoles, Government's role, Health related, HOuseholds, Islands, MHz, Microwave exposure, National Monuments, National Parks, Old Faithful, Parenting, Pulsed Radiation, radiation, Risk of Disease, Safety, School administrators, School Boards, School yards, Schools, State Parks, T-Mobile, Toxin, transmission, Waves, Who is Affected?, Workplace.
2 comments

“To keep up, cell “sites” — towers and antennas mostly — have increased tenfold, from fewer than 18,000 in 1994 to more than 175,000 now. Without additional towers, calls are lost and reception suffers.”

“Our companies are always running into this conundrum, which is, ‘We want cell phone service, but don’t put that tower here,'” Farren said. “When you’re dealing with communications through the air, you have to have antennas and towers.”

“To meet demand, companies are increasingly turning to nontraditional sites — fire houses, churches, schools, even cemeteries and national parks. A cell tower now sits near Yellowstone’s Old Faithful, despite strong opposition.”…..

….”Cell sites can be a financial boon to those who provide space for them. Cell companies won’t discuss rent, but Donohue said companies typically pay $800 to $2,000 per month, depending on location, the size of the tower or antenna, and other factors. That can be a significant amount for a struggling school district or a church with stagnant or declining membership.”….

….”T-Mobile sued. U.S. Magistrate Judge Frederick Buckles ruled in favor of the company in July. Debbie Barrett, a spokeswoman for suburban Seattle-based T-Mobile, said the company is doing everything it can to make the site “blend in.” But she said the antenna is needed.”

http://www.wired.com/news/wireless/0,1382,68600,00.html

A Call for Grant Money for Interdisciplinary Research to Study the Biological Effects of EMF’s! August 26, 2006

Posted by healthyself in 1.6 W/kg, 12000 volts, 16 Hz, 17.6 Hz, 2 W/kg, 2.4 GHz, 2.4 mW/Kg, 2.5 GHz, 200 gauss, 5 GHz, 50 Hz, 500 Volts, 5000 volts, 60 Hz Magnetic Fields, 8W/kg, 900 mHz, ADD, Addiction, ADHD, Aesthetics, Aging, Allergies, ALS, Alzheimer's, Amalgam filings, angst, Animal Research, Antennas, Antioxidants, arteriole, Atmospheric Pressure, Attention, Attention Deficit, Auric Field, Autism, Autism / Asperger's, Beneficial frequencies, Beta Rhythm, Bioeffects, Biofield, Biological Activity, Biological Dentistry, Biological Effects, Biomimetic, BioPhotons, Bioscalar Energy, Birth Defects, Blogroll, Blood, Blood Brain Barrier, Blood Pressure, Brain, Brain Cancer, Breast Cancer, Cancer, Cancer Protection, Cataracts, Cell changes, Cell Cultures, Cell death, cell membrane, Cell phone industry, Cell phone safety, Cell Phones, Cells, Cellular Morphology, Central Nervous System, CFIDS, Childhood Leukemia, Children, Children's health, Chromosomal damage, Chronic Exhaustion, Chronic Fatigue, Chronic Illness, Churches, Circadian rhythms, Circulation, Cloning, Coherence, Communication, Community, Concentration, Connective Tissue Pains, Consciousness, Cordless Phones, Cytotoxic Effects, Death, Decision Making, Definitions, Dementia, Depression, Detoxification, Diabetes, Diagnostic marker, Dizziness, DNA, Dopamine, Ear, ear ache, earphones, EEG, EHF, Elderly, Electrical Surges, Electrical Wiring, Electrochemical, Electromagetic pollution, electromagnetic, Electromagnetic Field, Electromagnetic pollution, Electromagnetic Spectrum, Electromagnetic waves, Electrosensitivity, Electrosmog, ELF, Emergency Medicine, EMF Research, EMF's, Employees, EMR, Endocrine, Endogenous Fields, Energy, Entropy, Environment, Epidemiology, Epilepsy, Exposure, Extra-Sensory Perception, Eye Cancer, Eyes, Family, Fatigue, Financial Considerations, Free Radicals, Frequencies, Funding, Games and Gaming, genes, GHz, Government's role, grams of tissue, Grants, Hand Portables, Harmonics, headaches, Healing, Health, Health related, Hearing, Heart, heat, Heavy Metals, HF, High Frequencies, high voltage transmission lines, Hormones, HOuseholds, HRD, Hz, Immune system, Impotence, Infant Death Syndrome, Inflammation, Inner Agitation, Integrative Medicine, Interdisciplinary, Intuition, Kids, Lack of Concentration, Learning, Legal Issues, Lethargy, Leukemia, LF, Lifestyle, Light, Long Term Health Risks, Low Frequencies, Lymphocytes, Lymphoma, Magnetic, MCS, Medical Research, Medicine, Memory Loss, Men', Men's Health, Mercury, MF, MHz, Microwave exposure, miscarriages, Mitigation, mobile telephones, Monitoring, Motivation, MS, nerves, Neural Electrophysiology, Neurasthenia, neurological, neuroma, neurons, neurosurgeons, Neurotransmitters, Noise, Non Profit Organizations, Non-Thermal Levels, Nose, Nutrition, Ocular, oncogenes, Optical, Overtones, Pacemakers, Pain, Pain Perception, Parenting, Penetration, People in Laboratories, Pets, Pineal Gland, Politics, Pregnant Women, pressure, Proteins, Public Policy, Pulsed Radiation, Quantum Physics, Quantum Vacuum, QV, Radar, radiation, Radio Waves, Radios, Reaction Time, Research, Research Needed, Resonance, Risk Factor, Risk of Disease, Safe Levels, Safety, SAR, School administrators, School Boards, Schools, sensations, Serotonin, SHF, Sick People, signaling enzymes, Sleep, Sleep disturbances, Solutions, Sound, Spine, Stress, Stroke, Subtle Energies, Suicide, Susceptibility to Infection, Symptoms, Teenagers, Throat, Tinnitus, Toxic Interactions, Toxin, Traffic Pollution, trains, Transfer, Transformation, transmission, Tumors, Tweenies, Unified Field, University, vacuum, VDT, Vibration, Vibrational Medicine, Vision, W/Kg, watts, Waves, Who is Affected?, WiFi, Women, Women's Health, Workplace.
comments closed
It is time for the funding agencies to realizethat we need to be asking new and different questions

about electropollution, EMF’s, and radiation.

There has been considerable research already done showing

relationships between many dis-ease processes and

electromagnetic frequencies. However, there has been a

limitation in the thinking so far, which raises new questions.

What if the cause and effect are not a direct link?

If the cell membrane is being affected by EMF’s, what effect

does that have on the body?

Would it always be the same effect on different kinds

of people?

If the signalizing enzymes are being affected by EMF’s,

would that always show up as the same kind of disease?

Why are some people more susceptible to symptoms from

EMF’s than others? Is there a genetic difference? A

cumulative difference? A geographic differernce?

A psychological difference? A consciousness difference?

A usuage difference?

How can one possibly set up a truly valid scientific study

when there are so many variables?

How long will it be before more people show signs

of cellular damage? How can it be measured?

What tests are there?

Since kids are on the phone much more than adults,

in some cases, are they likely to show symptoms sooner

because of the cumulative effect, or later because of

stronger immune systems?

These are questions that require the input of many

different kinds of professional to set up a good study.

It’s not so simple as saying A cause B.

How many people have to suffer before this issue is resolved?

It’s time to think outside the box!

 

Mobile Phones Alter Human DNA’ August 15, 2006

Posted by healthyself in 2.4 GHz, 5 GHz, 50 Hz, 60 Hz Magnetic Fields, Biological Activity, Biological Effects, Blogroll, Cancer, Cell changes, Cell phone safety, Cell Phones, Cells, Children's health, Churches, Decision Making, Digital, DNA, Electromagnetic pollution, Electrosensitivity, Electrosmog, ELF, EMF Research, EMF's, EMR, Environment, Epidemiologists, Family, Free Radicals, Games and Gaming, genes, Health related, heat, High Frequencies, high voltage transmission lines, HOuseholds, Hz, Immune system, Kids, Leukemia, Lifestyle, Long Term Health Risks, Low Frequencies, MCS, Medical Research, Men's Health, Microwave exposure, mobile telephones, nerves, Noise, Parenting, Penetration, Public Policy, Pulsed Radiation, radiation, Research, Risk of Disease, Safe Levels, Safety, Symptoms, Tweenies, Women's Health.
1 comment so far

“Radio waves from mobile phones do harm body cells and damage DNA, a laboratory study has shown.”

“Around 1.5 billion people around the world use mobile phones.”

“There is an ongoing debate over their safety, with fears over potential dangers linked to mobile phone masts and the handsets themselves.”

“….the report did recommend a precautionary approach and said children should only use mobile phones in emergencies.”

“….They found that, after being exposed to electromagnetic fields, the cells showed a significant increase in DNA damage which could not always be repaired by the cell.”

“Damage was also seen in the next generation of cells. Mutated cells are seen as a possible cause of cancer.”

“The study, which has not been published in a journal, also reported other harmful effects on cells.”

“The radiation used in the study was at Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) levels of between 0.3 and 2 watts per kilogram.”

“The SAR is the rate at which the body absorbs emissions from the phone handset.”

“Most phones emit radio signals at SAR levels of between 0.5 and 1 W/kg.”

“Mobile phones cannot be sold to unless they fall within the SAR of 2 watts per kg.”

“Franz Adlkofer, who led the Reflex study, said people should use landlines, rather than mobiles, wherever possible.”

….”We don’t want to create a panic, but it is good to take precautions.”

 

BBC NEWS Tuesday, 21 December, 2004, 10:35 GMT

The Cover Up About EMF’s….Why? August 11, 2006

Posted by healthyself in Biological Effects, Blogroll, Cell changes, Cell phone industry, Cell phone safety, Cell phone towers, Children's health, Chromosomal damage, Churches, Electrosensitivity, Electrosmog, ELF, Emergency Medicine, EMF Research, EMF's, Employees, EMR, Environment, Fatigue, Government's role, Health related, high voltage transmission lines, HOuseholds, Immune system, Islands, Legal Issues, Lifestyle, MCS, Medical Research, Men's Health, Microwave exposure, mobile telephones, oncogenes, radiation, Research, School Boards, State Parks, VDT, Who is Affected?, Women's Health.
2 comments

COVER UP CONSEQUENCES

“A good ten years have been lost by cover-up attempts, improper research fundings and an unwillingness to address the issue. By not addressing the issue of VDT injuries and electrical sensitivity, we have allowed something far worse to happen. In the shadow of the cover up activities, we have built microwave transmitters in our cities ( for cellular phones). The microwave transmitters are on roof tops, on apartment buildings, on water towers, on hills, in the depth of forests, on islands in the archipelago. Soon they will be in every block, in tunnels, in shopping centers, in offices. This has been done without thoroughly investigating the long term effects on human health of micro-waves. Research in this field (high frequencies), has been ignored, discouraged and even stopped. This is by far the biggest environmental threat to humans. Soon there will be no place on earth where you can be without being enveloped in the invisible electro-smog. Had we listened to the electrically and-VDT-injured we might have learned someting and paused, before smothering ourselves in microwaves.”

http://www.feb.se/ARTICLES/CoverUp.html

If Not Now, When? Good Question. August 11, 2006

Posted by healthyself in Blogroll, Cell phone safety, Children's health, Churches, Electromagnetic pollution, Electrosensitivity, ELF, EMF Research, EMF's, Employees, EMR, Environment, Epidemiologists, Government's role, Health related, high voltage transmission lines, HOuseholds, Legal Issues, Lifestyle, Men's Health, Parenting, radiation, Research, School administrators, School Boards, Schools, Women's Health.
1 comment so far

“…..I trust that the public recognizes the concern of this Council for the health and safety of the public, evinced clearly in the protective constraints of Decision and Order of [Docket No. 141], with which the utilities have cooperated, including mandatory compliance with any new federal or state EMF standards. I voted for the Certificate in September, 1991, despite the troubling preliminary evidence of a link between low level EMF compared with 1988-1989, because of its uncertainty, in reliance on these features of the Decision and Order. Changed conditions as discussed above now require something more. At a minimum they require that the affected residences and schools along the Bridgeport to Norwalk new 115kv line be accorded at least additional informational protections pursuant to our 1993 Best Management Practices and such other measures as may be shown to be needed after a full evidentiary hearing. To the object that this Docket is not the forum to achieve this purpose, which I believe to be shared by all Council members, I must ask, ‘if not now, when?’ Moreover, if reopening [Docket No. 141] has implications for households and schools adjacent to other electric power line in the state, then so be it. Associated costs would clearly fall within the scope of prudent expenses and investment by the utilities, includable as such in their rates….”

Litigation – Recent Cases.
Dissenting Opinion Filed By Council Commissioner Paulann Sheets

Last modified on: Thursday, March 11, 1999 12:15:42
Copyright © 1994-2006, Information Ventures, Inc. http://infoventures.com/emf/legal/lt-ct004.html

Citizens are rebelling against cell towers successfully! July 31, 2006

Posted by healthyself in Blogroll, Cancer Protection, Cell phone safety, Cell phone towers, Churches, Electromagetic pollution, electromagnetic, Electromagnetic pollution, Electrosensitivity, Electrosmog, ELF, EMF Research, EMF's, EMR, Environment, mobile telephones, Parenting, radiation, Risk of Disease, School administrators, School Boards, Schools.
5 comments

This seems to be coming a trend. Citizens are rebelling and some communities are responding. School boards and churches should know about this.

“Norfolk councillors have decided to get rid of a cellphone tower in the centre of Simcoe that residents say is a health risk.

After hearing from more than 20 people in an often emotional five-hour debate Tuesday, council voted to move recently installed Rogers Wireless Inc. antennae on the Simcoe water tower – even though it could cost the county an estimated $300,000.”

Cheryl Bauslaugh

http://www.brantfordexpositor.ca

http://www.emfacts.com/weblog/?p=487