jump to navigation

Have YOU noticed a Problem with YOUR Teeth near a Cell Tower? March 23, 2007

Posted by healthyself in "Silver" Fillings, Amalgam filings, Amplified Signals, Biochemical, Bioeffects, Biological Activity, Biological Dentistry, Biological Effects, Blogroll, Cell Masts, Cell phone safety, Cell phone towers, Cell Phones, Chronic Illness, Connective Tissue Pains, Cordless Phones, Cytotoxic Effects, Diagnostic marker, Electromagnetic Communications, Electromagnetic Interference, Electromagnetic pollution, Electromagnetic Radiation, Electromagnetic waves, Electrosensitivity, Electrosmog, ELF, Emergency Medicine, EMF Research, EMF's, Employees, EMR, Environment, Epidemiology, Exposure, Health and Safety Officer, Health related, HOuseholds, HRD, Human Resources, Interdisciplinary, Lifestyle, Long Term Health Risks, Metal, mobile telephones, Pain, Pain Perception, Penetration, Pulsed Radiation, radiation, Research Needed, Risk Factor, Risk of Disease, Safe Levels, sensations, Symptoms, teeth grinding, Toxic Interactions, Trace Minerals, Who is Affected?, Wireless Phones, Women's Health, Workplace.
1 comment so far

posted by Christine Ellis on 19 Mar 2006 at 9:58 am

“I have been working for a local District Council for 18 yrs and approximately 3 years ago a mast was erected outside our office window. Since then I have had problems with my teeth, pain in my mouth quite regularly over these years.”

“I have requested information from my Health & Safety Officer and twice got back the latest information on the dangers of these masts, which is saying there is no proven risks. In the last 6 months, we have had 5 new ladies employed in our office, all working in the same vicinity of this mast. 2 of the five have had severe problems with their teeth in these 6 months, one has very back teeth anyway, I have had one wisdom tooth losen and had to have out and another break in half, we were discussing this on Friday, and another lady has started having strange sensations in her mouth, she said like a magnet going over her teeth. The only lady who hasn’t had any problems has got all white fillings in her teeth. I asked all the others whether they have got all Mercury fillings and they have, as I have.”

“QUESTION: Could the mast be having an effect on Mercury fillings. ??????????”

“We would like to know please.”

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/youropinions.php?opinionid=8711

Metals in the Mouth March 22, 2007

Posted by healthyself in "Silver" Fillings, Aging, Alzheimer's, Amalgam filings, Amplified Signals, Animal Research, Biochemical, Bioeffects, Biofield, Biological Activity, Biological Dentistry, Biological Effects, Blogroll, Bluetooth, cell membrane, Cell Phones, Children's health, Cordless Phones, Cytotoxic Effects, Decision Making, Detoxification, Electrochemical, Electromagnetic Communications, Electromagnetic Field, Electromagnetic pollution, Electromagnetic Radiation, Electromagnetic waves, Electrosensitivity, Electrosmog, ELF, EMF Research, EMF's, Environment, Financial Considerations, Frequencies, grams of tissue, Health related, Heavy Metals, Integrative Medicine, Interdisciplinary, Kids, Legal Issues, Lifestyle, Long Term Health Risks, Men's Health, Mercury, mobile telephones, Parenting, People in Laboratories, radiation, Research Needed, Risk Factor, Risk of Disease, Stress, Symptoms, Teenagers, teeth grinding, Toxic Interactions, Tweenies, Vapor, Who is Affected?, Women's Health.
add a comment

 This is an important video concerning the affect of mercury which comes from fillings in the teeth as vapor as they are rubbed or scratched.

http://iaomt.org/videos/index.asp

Besides creating vapor in the mouth and tissues of the body, metals in the mouth can carry electrical charge…guess from where?

Sound, Noise, Vibration and….Circulation October 23, 2006

Posted by healthyself in Aesthetics, Amplified Signals, Amplitude, Art, Bioeffects, Biological Effects, Body Temperature, Buzzing, Children's health, Circulation, Color, Computer Rooms, Decision Making, Ear, Electrical Components, Electrical Pulses, Electrical Surges, Electrical Wiring, Electromagnetic Field, Electromagnetic Spectrum, Electromagnetic waves, Electrosensitivity, Electrosmog, ELF, EMF Research, EMF's, Environment, Exposure, Frequencies, Health related, Hearing, Interdisciplinary, Lifestyle, Long Term Health Risks, Men's Health, Parenting, Pulses, Radio Frequency Radiation, Radio Waves, Research Needed, Risk Factor, Safe Levels, School administrators, Schools, Sound, Who is Affected?, Women's Health, Workplace.
add a comment
  "In art processes, noise can be caused by vibration, forging,

woodworking and other machinery, pneumatic tools, exhaust fans,

etc.  In particular, old or improperly maintained equipment tends

to create more noise.  In general, if someone has to raise their

voice to be heard by another person one to two feet away, then

the noise level is too high, especially if it is a steady noise....
Some studies have shown that woodworking teachers have a higher rate
of hearing loss than other teachers."

     "Sound intensity is measured in decibels (dB), on a

logarithmic scale.  In this scale, 90 dB is ten times more

intense than 80 dB, and 110 dB is ten times more intense than 100

dB.  The sound intensity doubles for every increase of 3 dB,

showing that small increases in decibel levels can involve large

increases in sound intensity.  Table 7-1 shows the decibel levels

of common sounds.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table 7-1   Approximate Sound Levels of Common Noise Sources

Source                                       Sound Level (dB)

Jet engine                                      160

Loud amplified music                            118

Planer                                          115

Portable grinder                                110

Circular saw                                    105

Sander, foundry                                  95

Classroom teaching voice at 3 feet               75

Normal speaking voice at 3 feet

"Pneumatic and vibrating equipment such as chain saws can

also create problems due to vibration.  Raynaud's phenomenon,

which is also called "white fingers" or "dead fingers", affects

the circulation of the fingers, causing them to turn white from

lack of blood and to lose sensation.  Vibration can cause this,

particularly with simultaneous exposure to cold, for example,

from the air blast of pneumatic tools.  This condition is

initially temporary, but can spread to the whole hand and cause

permanent damage."

http://www.uic.edu/sph/glakes/harts1/HARTS_library/school7.txt

Fiber Optics and EMF’s October 22, 2006

Posted by healthyself in Amplified Signals, Amplitude, Cell phone safety, Cell Phones, Children's health, Conversations, Cordless Phones, Decision Making, Distribution, Electrical Components, Electrical Pulses, Electrical Surges, Electrical Wiring, Electrochemical, Electromagetic pollution, Electromagnetic Communications, Electromagnetic Field, Electromagnetic Interference, Electromagnetic pollution, Electromagnetic Radiation, Electromagnetic Spectrum, Electromagnetic waves, Electrosensitivity, Electrosmog, ELF, EMF Research, EMF's, EMR, Environment, Exposure, Family, Fiber Optic, Health related, HOuseholds, Lifestyle, Light, light beam, MCS, Men's Health, mobile telephones, Networks, Pulsed Radiation, Pulses, radiation, Radio Frequency Radiation, Radio Waves, Radios, Research, Research Needed, Safety, Solutions, Stress, Telecommunications, Telephony, transmission, Who is Affected?, Women's Health, Workplace.
5 comments

“No EMF or RF interference
The very nature of fiber optic transmission makes it virtually immune to electromagnetic and radio-frequency interference – and even lightning – which can be especially valuable in environments such as power-transmission or generating facilities, antenna or broadcast installations, or certain industrial environments.”

http://www.panasonic.com/business/security/fiberoptics.asp

‘Manageable’ fear a handy safety tool

i_9602b00.gif

‘As fiber optics continues to spread throughout broadband communication plants, and new fiber equipment is beginning to feature higher power outputs, many safety and training professionals in the industry are re-energizing their fiber optic training efforts. Kevin Wilkes, director of field services for Integration Technologies, says that while fiber optic technology continues to change, fiber optic safety issues have not. In fact, he believes new technology only underscores the importance of long-term safety training that needs a healthy dose of fear to succeed.

“I think probably 99 percent of the concerns about safety involving fiber have not changed with technology,” says Wilkes. “I think they’ve been amplified by higher launch powers and connectivity. But, the basis is still there for problems with the eyes.

“It’s pretty straightforward…. Of course, there are other things to worry about. But they’re pretty trivial compared to the eyes. You instill what I call ‘manageable’ fear. And, there’s nothing wrong with that at all. Because too much comfort breeds carelessness.”

http://www.cedmagazine.com/article/CA6261762.html

Advantages of Fiber Optic Systems

“Fiber optic transmission systems – a fiber optic transmitter and receiver, connected by fiber optic cable – offer a wide range of benefits not offered by traditional copper wire or coaxial cable. These include:1. The ability to carry much more information and deliver it with greater fidelity than either copper wire or coaxial cable.

2. Fiber optic cable can support much higher data rates, and at greater distances, than coaxial cable, making it ideal for transmission of  serial digital data.

3. The fiber is totally immune to virtually all kinds of interference, including lightning, and will not conduct electricity. It can therefore   come in direct contact with high voltage electrical equipment and power lines. It will also not create ground loops of any kind.

4. As the basic fiber is made of glass, it will not corrode and is unaffected by most chemicals. It can be buried directly in most kinds of  soil or exposed to most corrosive atmospheres in chemical plants without significant concern.

5. Since the only carrier in the fiber is light, there is no possibility of a spark from a broken fiber. Even in the most explosive of atmospheres, there is no fire hazard, and no danger of electrical shock to personnel repairing broken fibers.

6. Fiber optic cables are virtually unaffected by outdoor atmospheric conditions, allowing them to be lashed directly to telephone poles or existing electrical cables without concern for extraneous signal pickup.

7. A fiber optic cable, even one that contains many fibers, is usually much smaller and lighter in weight than a wire or coaxial cable with similar information carrying capacity. It is easier to handle and install, and uses less duct space. (It can frequently be installed without ducts.)

8. Fiber optic cable is ideal for secure communications systems because it is very difficult to tap but very easy to monitor. In addition, there is absolutely no electrical radiation from a fiber.”

http://www.commspecial.com/fiberguide-print.htm

Hearing Aids and Cell Phones October 6, 2006

Posted by healthyself in Amplified Signals, Amplitude, Bioeffects, Biological Dentistry, Biological Effects, Blogroll, Brainwave Interference, Buzzing, Cell Phones, Communication, Conversations, Cordless Phones, Decision Making, Distribution, Ear, Elderly, Electrical Pulses, Electromagnetic Communications, Electromagnetic Interference, Electromagnetic pollution, Electromagnetic waves, Electrosensitivity, Electrosmog, ELF, EMF Research, EMF's, EMR, Environment, Exposure, Frequencies, GHz, Government's role, Health related, Hearing, HF, High Frequencies, HOuseholds, Interdisciplinary, LF, Lifestyle, Long Term Health Risks, Low Frequencies, MCS, Men's Health, MHz, Microwave exposure, mobile telephones, Neural Electrophysiology, Noise, Public Policy, Pulsed Radiation, Pulses, radiation, Radio Waves, Radios, Research Needed, Risk of Disease, Safety, Sound, Static, Toxic Interactions, Who is Affected?, Wireless Phones, Women's Health.
2 comments

Advice for People with Hearing Aids or Implanted Hearing Devices

“Before you buy a cell phone, you should try different brands and models to see which phone works best for you…People who wear hearing aids or have implanted hearing devices may experience some difficulties when trying to use cell phones. Some cell phones cause radio frequency interference with hearing aids, so the user hears high-pitched whistling sounds, buzzes, or static.”

“Fortunately, both cell phones and hearing aids are improving. Some phones have lower radio frequency (RF) emissions or different technology that can reduce the unwanted effects on hearing aids….”

“…On July 10, 2003, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) modified the exemption for wireless phones under the Hearing Aid Compatibility Act of 1988. This means that the FCC will require cell phone makers to produce several models that are designed to be compatible with hearing aids.”

http://www.fda.gov/cellphones/hearingaids.html

What is Analog? September 26, 2006

Posted by healthyself in Amplified Signals, Amplitude, Bioeffects, Biological Effects, Blogroll, Cell phone safety, Cell Phones, Cordless Phones, Decision Making, Definitions, Digital, Electrical Components, Electrical Surges, Electrical Wiring, Electrochemical, electromagnetic, Electromagnetic Communications, Electromagnetic Field, Electromagnetic Interference, Electromagnetic pollution, Electromagnetic Spectrum, Electromagnetic waves, Electrosensitivity, Electrosmog, EMF Research, EMF's, EMR, Environment, Frequencies, Health related, Heart Disease, Internet, Lifestyle, Light, Microwave exposure, mobile telephones, Pulsed Radiation, radiation, Radio Waves, Radios, Risk Factor, Sound, Speakerphones, Telecommunications, Telephony, Toxic Interactions, Transducer, Transfer, transmission.
add a comment

Analog – A signaling method that uses continuous changes in the amplitude or frequency of a radio transmission to convey information. It relies on a continuous (rather than pulsed as in digital) electrical signal that varies in amplitude or frequency in response to changes of sound, light, position, etc., impressed on a transducer in the sending device; opposite of digital.

http://www.mobiledia.com/glossary/23.html

Talking on a Cell Phone, Applying Makeup and Rage September 26, 2006

Posted by healthyself in aateriosclerosis, Addiction, Alzheimer's, Amplified Signals, Amplitude, Blogroll, Blood, Blood Brain Barrier, Brain, Brainwave Interference, Cardiac Problems, Cell phone safety, Cell phone towers, Cell Phones, Cells, Children, Children's health, Depression, Digital, Dizziness, Electrochemical, electromagnetic, Electromagnetic Communications, Electromagnetic pollution, Electromagnetic Spectrum, Electromagnetic waves, Electrosensitivity, Electrosmog, EMF Research, Environment, Exposure, Fatigue, Financial Considerations, Government's role, Handheld Units, headaches, Health related, Heart, Heart Disease, Imbalances, Immune system, Integrative Medicine, Kids, Memory, Memory Loss, Microwave exposure, MS, nausea, neurological, Parenting, Poisons, Proteins, Public Policy, Pulsed Radiation, Pulses, radiation, Radio Waves, Radios, Research, School administrators, School Boards, Schools, Serotonin, Skull, Speakerphones, Suicide, Susceptibility to Infection, Symptoms, Teenagers, Toxin, Trace Minerals, Tweenies, White Blood Cells, Who is Affected?.
1 comment so far

“After two minutes’ conversation, a cell phone’s digitized impulses disable the safety barrier (blood-brain-barrier) that isolates the brain from destructive proteins and poisons in the blood. Professor Leif Salford, the neurologist who carried out the research for this finding, said “It seems that molecules such as proteins and toxins can pass out of the blood, while the phone is switched on, and enter the brain. We need to bear in mind diseases such as MS and Alzheimer’s are linked to proteins being found in the brain.” Startled by $4 billion a year in extra claims among cell phone-wielding drivers, North American insurers did a double-take that found simply juggling phones is not causing a 600% increase in accidents over other drivers busy shaving, applying makeup, tuning radios, taming pets, making out, pouring coffee, retrieving dropped cigarettes, talking and gesturing to passengers, or actually steering the vehicle.  Instead of just another dangerous distraction, tests conducted by the U.S. Department of Energy found that using a cell phone severely impairs memory and reaction times. Hands-free mobile speakerphones cause even more crashes because they typically emit 10-times more brainwave interference than handheld units. For all drivers dialing out, University of Toronto investigators report that the heightened probability of cracking up your car persists for up to 15-minutes after completing a call.”

“That’s comparable to the risk of crashing while driving dead drunk exclaims Dr. Chris Runball, chairman of the B.C. Medical Association’s emergency medical services committee. Reeling from “dial-a-collision” costs, the government of British Columbia may join England, Spain, Israel, Switzerland and Brazil in restricting or banning the use of cell phones by drivers. In New Zealand, cell phone towers are prohibited on school property because of possible health effects. But Health Canada regulations ignore the hidden hazards of cell-wrenching cell phones, which send pulsed signals through the skull in a process one expert likens to “jackhammers on the brain.” “Safety Code 6” looks only at microwaves burning skin. Basically, Health Canada claims if it can’t cook you, it can’t hurt you, its like saying cigarettes aren’t dangerous unless they burn you. Carrying similar risks of long-term lethality, and strangely just as legal, cell phone addiction mirrors the prestigious early allure of smoking  – as well as an immensely profitable industry’s steadfast denial of risk and responsibility. As poisonous as cigarette smoke and even harder to corral, the cell phone’s second-hand microwave and radio-frequency (RF) pollution pose invisible but significant risks to bystanders–particularly children riding in cars that transmit amplified cell phone signals through their steel structure. Cell phone transmissions damage the ability of white blood cells to ward off infectious disease by disrupting the immune system’s electromagnetic communications. Dr. Neil Cherry has measured accelerated aging, increased cell death and cancers caused by radio frequency microwaves from cell phones and their relay towers.”

“With the brain’s electro-chemical communications repeatedly zapped by lightning-like cell phone pulses, this Ph.D. biophysicist warns that headaches, fatigue, lethargy, nausea, dizziness, depression, arteriosclerosis and even Alzheimer’s can result from frequent or prolonged calls.   “There is also a higher incidence of cardiac problems,” Cherry comments, “in terms of the timing function in hearts. You get more heart attacks and more heart disease – it has now been shown in many studies.” The biophysicist from Lincoln University in Christ Church, New Zealand has also found that cell phones can murderously modify moods. In brains and bodies seriously derailed by tiny imbalances in trace minerals and hormones, depression, suicide, anger, rage and violence can result when calcium and serotonin levels are disrupted by cell phone transmissions.”

http://www.tuberose.com/Cell_Phones.html