jump to navigation

Why Would WHO Do This If There Weren’t a Recognized Problem? (Even if they won’t admit it yet) September 5, 2006

Posted by healthyself in .000021 W/Kg, .0004 W/Kg, .001 W/Kg, .0021 W/KG, .005 W/Kg, .0317 W/Kg, .05 W/Kg, .13 W/Kg, .14 W/Kg, .2 mHz, .26 W/Kg, .4 W/Kg, .58 W.Kg, .6 W/Kg, .75 W/Kg, 1.2 W/Kg, 1.6 W/kg, 100 kHz-94GHz, 10000 Hz, 10mW, 12000 volts, 138 kv, 14 mG, 16 Hz, 17.6 Hz, 2 W/kg, 2.4 GHz, 2.4 mW/Kg, 20 Hz, 200 gauss, 20000 Hz, 200000 Hz, 35 mG, 3W/Kg, 4 mG, 45, 45 Hz, 5 GHz, 5 Hz, 50 Hz, 500 Volts, 60 Hz Magnetic Fields, 85, 8W/kg, 900 mHz, Animal Research, Cell phone safety, Children's health, Chromosomal damage, Communication, Community, Death, Decision Making, Digital, Electromagnetic pollution, Electromagnetic waves, Electrosensitivity, Electrosmog, ELF, Emergency Medicine, EMF Research, EMF's, Employees, EMR, Environment, Epidemiologists, Funding, Games and Gaming, genes, GHz, Government's role, grams of tissue, Grants, Hand Portables, Health related, High Frequencies, HOuseholds, Hz, Immune system, Legal Issues, Long Term Health Risks, Low Frequencies, Medical Research, Men's Health, MHz, Microwave exposure, Military, miscarriages, mobile telephones, Noise, Parenting, Public Policy, Pulsed Radiation, radiation, Reaction Time, Research, Risk Factor, Risk of Disease, Safe Levels, Safety, SAR, School administrators, Teenagers, Tweenies, University, W/Kg, watts, Who is Affected?, Women's Health, Workplace.
4 comments

Electromagnetic fields Photos permitted by the National Radiological Protection Board, UK

“Electromagnetic fields of all frequencies represent one of the most common and fastest growing environmental influences, about which anxiety and speculation are spreading. All populations are now exposed to varying degrees of EMF, and the levels will continue to increase as technology advances.”

“As part of its Charter to protect public health and in response to public concern, the World Health Organization (WHO) established the International EMF Project in 1996 to assess the scientific evidence of possible health effects of EMF in the frequency range from 0 to 300 GHz.”
“The EMF Project is open to broad participation.”

“The EMF Project is open to any WHO Member State government, i.e. department of health, or representatives of other national institutions concerned with radiation protection. The project is fully funded by participating countries and agencies.”

Advertisements

Dangers from Various SAR levels on Cell Phones September 4, 2006

Posted by healthyself in .000021 W/Kg, .0004 W/Kg, .001 W/Kg, .0021 W/KG, .005 W/Kg, .0317 W/Kg, .05 W/Kg, .13 W/Kg, .14 W/Kg, .26 W/Kg, .4 W/Kg, .58 W.Kg, .6 W/Kg, .75 W/Kg, 1.2 W/Kg, 2 W/kg, 2.4 mW/Kg, 3W/Kg, Cell phone safety.
3 comments
SAR Reported Biological Effects References
0.000021 – .0021 W/Kg Changes in cell cycle and cell proliferation (960 MHz GSM cell phone signal) Kwee, 1997
0.0004 W/Kg Pulsed cell phone RF caused changes in blood-brain barrier that protects brain from outside harmful chemicals and toxins (915 MHz GSM cell phone) Salford, 1997
0.001 W/Kg EEG brain waves are altered when exposed to cell phone signal at 0.1 µW/cm2 Von KIitzing, 1995
0.0317 W/Kg Decrease in eating and drinking Ray & Behari, 1990
.005 to .05 W/Kg Calcium efflux Dutta et al, 1989
0.14 W/Kg Elevation of immune response at 100 µW/cm2 Elekes, 1996
0.13 – 1.4 W/Kg Lymphoma cancer rate is 2.4 times normal with two 1/2 hour exposures per day of cell phone exposure (pulsed digital mobile phone signal 900 MHz) Repacholi, 1997
0.26 W/Kg Harmful effects to the eyes/ certain drugs can sensitize eyes to RFR Kues, 1992
0.4 W/Kg Statistically significant increase in malignant tumors at 480 µW/cm2 Guy, 1984
0.58 – 0.75 W/Kg Biological effect on the development of brain tumors at 18% of standard (836 MHz TDMA digital cell phone signal) Adey, 1996
0.6 and 1.2 W/Kg DNA single and double strand breaks from RF exposure (2450 MHz) Lai, 1995
2.4 mW/Kg to 24 mW/Kg Digital cell phone (836 TDMA) at very low intensities cause DNA effects in human cells. DNA effects are direct DNA damage and the rate at which DNA is repaired. Is equal to about 800 µW/cm2 power density Phillips, 1998
2-3 W/Kg Cancer acceleration in skin and breast tumors at 50 – 75% of standard Szmigielski, 1982

http://www.rfsafe.com/health_effects.htm

A Call for Grant Money for Interdisciplinary Research to Study the Biological Effects of EMF’s! August 26, 2006

Posted by healthyself in 1.6 W/kg, 12000 volts, 16 Hz, 17.6 Hz, 2 W/kg, 2.4 GHz, 2.4 mW/Kg, 2.5 GHz, 200 gauss, 5 GHz, 50 Hz, 500 Volts, 5000 volts, 60 Hz Magnetic Fields, 8W/kg, 900 mHz, ADD, Addiction, ADHD, Aesthetics, Aging, Allergies, ALS, Alzheimer's, Amalgam filings, angst, Animal Research, Antennas, Antioxidants, arteriole, Atmospheric Pressure, Attention, Attention Deficit, Auric Field, Autism, Autism / Asperger's, Beneficial frequencies, Beta Rhythm, Bioeffects, Biofield, Biological Activity, Biological Dentistry, Biological Effects, Biomimetic, BioPhotons, Bioscalar Energy, Birth Defects, Blogroll, Blood, Blood Brain Barrier, Blood Pressure, Brain, Brain Cancer, Breast Cancer, Cancer, Cancer Protection, Cataracts, Cell changes, Cell Cultures, Cell death, cell membrane, Cell phone industry, Cell phone safety, Cell Phones, Cells, Cellular Morphology, Central Nervous System, CFIDS, Childhood Leukemia, Children, Children's health, Chromosomal damage, Chronic Exhaustion, Chronic Fatigue, Chronic Illness, Churches, Circadian rhythms, Circulation, Cloning, Coherence, Communication, Community, Concentration, Connective Tissue Pains, Consciousness, Cordless Phones, Cytotoxic Effects, Death, Decision Making, Definitions, Dementia, Depression, Detoxification, Diabetes, Diagnostic marker, Dizziness, DNA, Dopamine, Ear, ear ache, earphones, EEG, EHF, Elderly, Electrical Surges, Electrical Wiring, Electrochemical, Electromagetic pollution, electromagnetic, Electromagnetic Field, Electromagnetic pollution, Electromagnetic Spectrum, Electromagnetic waves, Electrosensitivity, Electrosmog, ELF, Emergency Medicine, EMF Research, EMF's, Employees, EMR, Endocrine, Endogenous Fields, Energy, Entropy, Environment, Epidemiology, Epilepsy, Exposure, Extra-Sensory Perception, Eye Cancer, Eyes, Family, Fatigue, Financial Considerations, Free Radicals, Frequencies, Funding, Games and Gaming, genes, GHz, Government's role, grams of tissue, Grants, Hand Portables, Harmonics, headaches, Healing, Health, Health related, Hearing, Heart, heat, Heavy Metals, HF, High Frequencies, high voltage transmission lines, Hormones, HOuseholds, HRD, Hz, Immune system, Impotence, Infant Death Syndrome, Inflammation, Inner Agitation, Integrative Medicine, Interdisciplinary, Intuition, Kids, Lack of Concentration, Learning, Legal Issues, Lethargy, Leukemia, LF, Lifestyle, Light, Long Term Health Risks, Low Frequencies, Lymphocytes, Lymphoma, Magnetic, MCS, Medical Research, Medicine, Memory Loss, Men', Men's Health, Mercury, MF, MHz, Microwave exposure, miscarriages, Mitigation, mobile telephones, Monitoring, Motivation, MS, nerves, Neural Electrophysiology, Neurasthenia, neurological, neuroma, neurons, neurosurgeons, Neurotransmitters, Noise, Non Profit Organizations, Non-Thermal Levels, Nose, Nutrition, Ocular, oncogenes, Optical, Overtones, Pacemakers, Pain, Pain Perception, Parenting, Penetration, People in Laboratories, Pets, Pineal Gland, Politics, Pregnant Women, pressure, Proteins, Public Policy, Pulsed Radiation, Quantum Physics, Quantum Vacuum, QV, Radar, radiation, Radio Waves, Radios, Reaction Time, Research, Research Needed, Resonance, Risk Factor, Risk of Disease, Safe Levels, Safety, SAR, School administrators, School Boards, Schools, sensations, Serotonin, SHF, Sick People, signaling enzymes, Sleep, Sleep disturbances, Solutions, Sound, Spine, Stress, Stroke, Subtle Energies, Suicide, Susceptibility to Infection, Symptoms, Teenagers, Throat, Tinnitus, Toxic Interactions, Toxin, Traffic Pollution, trains, Transfer, Transformation, transmission, Tumors, Tweenies, Unified Field, University, vacuum, VDT, Vibration, Vibrational Medicine, Vision, W/Kg, watts, Waves, Who is Affected?, WiFi, Women, Women's Health, Workplace.
comments closed
It is time for the funding agencies to realizethat we need to be asking new and different questions

about electropollution, EMF’s, and radiation.

There has been considerable research already done showing

relationships between many dis-ease processes and

electromagnetic frequencies. However, there has been a

limitation in the thinking so far, which raises new questions.

What if the cause and effect are not a direct link?

If the cell membrane is being affected by EMF’s, what effect

does that have on the body?

Would it always be the same effect on different kinds

of people?

If the signalizing enzymes are being affected by EMF’s,

would that always show up as the same kind of disease?

Why are some people more susceptible to symptoms from

EMF’s than others? Is there a genetic difference? A

cumulative difference? A geographic differernce?

A psychological difference? A consciousness difference?

A usuage difference?

How can one possibly set up a truly valid scientific study

when there are so many variables?

How long will it be before more people show signs

of cellular damage? How can it be measured?

What tests are there?

Since kids are on the phone much more than adults,

in some cases, are they likely to show symptoms sooner

because of the cumulative effect, or later because of

stronger immune systems?

These are questions that require the input of many

different kinds of professional to set up a good study.

It’s not so simple as saying A cause B.

How many people have to suffer before this issue is resolved?

It’s time to think outside the box!