Posted by healthyself in "Cellular" Relay Antennas, Adolescents, Alarming, Amplified Signals, Antennas, Biological Effects, Biologically Signficant, Blogroll, Brain Cancer, Cell phone safety, Cell Phone Transmissions, Cell Phones, Cellular Damage, Childhood Cancer, Children, Children's health, Cordless Telephone Base Units, Danger, Dangerous, Denial of Risk, Electromagnetic Radiation, Electrosensitivity, Electrosmog meter, EMF Exposure, EMF Research, EMF-induced effects, Exposure, Health Deterioratrion, Health Risk, Health Risks, Human Populations, Kids, Landline, Lifestyle, Lifetime, Long Term Health Effects, Long Term Health Risks, Medical Research, radiation, RF Meters, Risk of Cancer, Risk of Disease, Smart Meter, Tweenies, Unsafe, Who is Affected?, Wireless Microphones, Wireless Phones, Wireless Revolution, Wireless router.
http://emf.mercola.com/sites/emf/archive/2011/03/12/will-microwaves-kill-more-than-cigarettes-and-asbestos-combined.aspx
Posted by healthyself in Bioeffects, Biofield, Electromagnetic Field, Electromagnetic Interference, Electromagnetic pollution, Electromagnetic Radiation, Electrosmog, Emissions, Exposure, radiation.
“As innovative and popular as it is, the iPhone may well be one of the worst offenders, for a number of reasons.
Even when you’re not using your iPhone but have it on, it still operates as a base station, transmitting radiation to you.
Further, iPhones tend to get a great deal of use due to their amazing plethora of applications, which increases your risk.
Data waves from your iPhone substantially affect your biology, altering intercellular communication. But, iPhones aren’t the only offenders. Though they may not act as base stations, every phone still has to connect to a base station. As long as your phone is turned on, it continually emits EMR in an attempt to connect to that base station.”
http://products.mercola.com/blue-tube-headset/?source=nl
Posted by healthyself in Blogroll, Blood Brain Barrier, Brain, Brain Waves, Ear, ear ache, EEG, Electrical Pulses, Electrical Surges, Electrochemical Communications, Electromagetic pollution, Electromagnetic pollution, Electromagnetic Radiation, Electrosensitivity, EMF Exposure, EMF Research, EMF's, EMF-induced effects, Hearing, Heart, Heart Attacks, Heart Disease, Heightened Risk.
“The heart’s EMF (electro-magnetic field) is five thousand times more powerful than the electromagnetic field created by the brain and, in addition to its immense power, has subtle, non-local effects that travel within these forms of energy. … the heart generates over fifty thousand femtoteslas (a measure of EMF) compared to less than ten femtoteslas recorded from the brain.” (p. 55) The profound significance of these facts leads … to comment: “The Heart’s Code points the way to a new revolution in our thinking. Metaphorically, the heart is the sun, the pulsing, energetic centre of our biophysical “solar”system, and the brain is the earth, one of the most important planets in our biophysical system. One implication of the energy cardiology/cardio-energetic revolution is the radical (meaning “root”) idea that energetically, the brain revolves around the heart, not the other way around.” (1998, p. xii) The heart is the largest source of biophysical energy in the body and within our psychological life. … the heart involves energy and information that comprises the essence or soul of who we are. The idea, that the heart is the centre of the psychology of the individual, instead of the brain, would indeed revolutionize our understanding of normal and supernormal psychology. Adopting this view would be analogous to the Copernican revolution, wherein scientists realized that the earth, rather than being the centre of the universe, traveled around the sun within the solar system. The egocentric attitude of humans was shattered. Likewise, the acceptance of a deeper conceptualization of the heart, consciousness and the nature of Self would constitute a revolutionary development in modern psychology, philosophy and the life sciences.”
http://www.zeropoint.ca/heartIII6enigmasheart.htm
“The Soviets have led the way in learning about the risks of electropollution, and, as we have seen, they’ve apparently been the first to harness those dangers for malicious intent. .. the spectrum of potential weapons extends far beyond the limits of the Moscow signal, and Americans have been actively exploring some of them for many years. Most or all …EMR effects can be scaled up or down for use against individuals or whole crowds …”
“The crudest of these … would be a sort of electromagnetic flamethrower with a greater range than chemical types. Dogs were cooked to death in experiments … as long ago as 1955, and high-power transmitters using short UHF wavelengths can severely burn exposed skin in seconds.”……
.”…. discovery that certain pulsed microwave beams increased the permeability of the blood-brain barrier could be turned into a supplemental weapon to enhance the effects of drugs, bacteria, or poisons.”
“…calcium-outflow windows …could be used to interfere with the functioning of the entire brain….”
“… microwaves of 300 to 3,000 megahertz were pulsed at specific rates, humans (even deaf people) could “hear” them. The beam caused a booming, hissing, clicking, or buzzing, depending on the exact frequency and pulse rate, and the sound seemed to come from just behind the head…”
“….ridiculed for this announcement, just like many radar technicians who’d been told they were crazy for hearing certain radar beams. Later work has shown that the microwaves are sensed somewhere in the temporal region just above and slightly in front of the ears. The phenomenon apparently results from pressure waves set up in brain tissue, some of which activate the sound receptors of the inner ear via bone conduction, while others directly stimulate nerve cells in the auditory pathways. Experiments on rats have shown that a strong signal can generate a sound pressure of 120 decibels, or approximately the level near a jet engine at takeoff….”
“…could speed up, slow down, or stop isolated frog hearts by synchronizing the pulse rate of a microwave beam with the beat of the heart itself. Similiar results have been obtained using live frogs, indicating that it’s technically feasible to produce heart attacks with a ray designed to penetrate the human chest.”
http://www.fiu.edu/~mizrachs/emf-war.html
Posted by healthyself in Health related, Blogroll, Brain Cancer, Teenagers, Cell phone safety, EMF's, Children, Research, Electromagnetic pollution, Kids, Tweenies, neuroma, Electrosensitivity, Symptoms, Children's health, EMF Research, Risk of Disease, Biological Effects, Risk Factor, neurological, Brain, Pulsed Radiation, Long Term Health Risks, Cell Phones, Bioeffects, Cordless Phones, Research Needed, Hearing, Wireless Phones, Electromagnetic Radiation, Health warnings, Cell Phone Transmissions, Health Risks, Long Term Health Effects, Brain Damage, Human Populations, Brain Tumors, Investigators, EMF-induced effects, Biologically Signficant, EMF Exposure, Childhood Cancer, Risk of Cancer, Danger, Heightened Risk, Risk, Health Risk, Human Biological Experiment, Ear Tumors, immune and nervous funtions, Electrosensitive, Brain Stress, Cordless Telephone Base Units.
Tags: Add new tag
“
Alarming new research indicates that children and teenagers are five times more likely to get brain cancer if they use cell phones. The study is raising fears that today’s young people may suffer an epidemic of the disease in later life.”
“The Swedish research was reported this month at the first international conference on cell phones and health. It came from a further analysis of data from one of the biggest studies carried out on the cell phone/cancer link… “people who started mobile phone use before the age of 20″ had more than five-fold increase in glioma, a cancer of the glial cells that support the central nervous system.”
“The risk to young people from household cordless phones was almost as great. Cordless phones caused a fourfold increase in risk.”
“Young cell phone users were also five times more likely to get acoustic neuromas, disabling tumors of the auditory nerve that often cause deafness.”
Sources:
- EMF & Health: A Global Issue September 8-9, 2008, The Royal Society, London
Posted by healthyself in Adolescents, Aging, Alarming, Bioeffects, Biofield, Blogroll, Cell Phone Pulses, Cell phone safety, Cell Phone Transmissions, Cell Phones, Cordless Phones, Danger, Denial of Risk, Electrical Pulses, Electrical Surges, Electromagnetic pollution, Electromagnetic Radiation, Electromagnetic Signals, Electrosensitivity, Electrosmog, EMF's, EMF-induced effects, Emissions, Environment, Exposure, Hand Portables, Handheld Units, Health related, Health Risk, Health Risks, heat, Humor, Kids, Lifestyle, Long Term Health Effects, Long Term Health Risks, Microwave exposure, Microwave Ovens, Mobile Phone Transmissions, mobile telephones, Pulsed Radiation, Research Needed, ringing, Risk of Disease, Safe Levels, Sufficient Evidence, Teenagers, transmission, Tweenies, Who is Affected?, Wireless, Wireless Phones, Wireless Revolution.
Popping corn
88http://www.dailymotion.com/relevance/search/portable/video/x5odhh_pop-corn-telephone-portable-microon_news
Posted by healthyself in "Cellular" Relay Antennas, Adolescents, Bioeffects, Biological Effects, Blogroll, Broadcast Antennas, Cancer Protection, Cell Masts, Cell phone industry, Cell phone safety, Cell phone towers, Cell Phone Transmissions, Cellular Phone Frequencies, Children's health, Cordless Phones, Danger, Dangerous, Decision Making, Denial of Risk, Electromagnetic pollution, Electromagnetic Radiation, Electromagnetic Signals, Electromagnetic waves, Electrosensitivity, Electrosmog, ELF, EMF Exposure, EMF Research, EMF's, EMF-induced effects, Environment, Generations, Government's role, Guidelines, Health related, Health Risk, Health Risks, Health warnings, Heightened Risk, Human Populations, Kids, Lifestyle, Lifetime, Long Term Health Effects, Long Term Health Risks, masts, Men's Health, microwaves, Mobile Music, Mobile Phone Transmissions, mobile telephones, Monitoring, Monitoring Authorities, Parenting, Phone mast, Public areas, Public Policy, Pulsed Radiation, radiation, Recommendations, Research Needed, Risk, Risk Factor, Risk of Disease, School administrators, School Boards, School yards, Schools, Sufficient Evidence, Teachers, Teenagers, Transmitter Towers, Tweenies, Unsafe, Who is Affected?, Wireless, Wireless Phones, Wireless Revolution, Wireless Technologies, Women's Health, Workplace.
Tags: Add new tag, India
27 May 2008, 0545 hrs IST,Somdatta Basu,TNN
“KOLKATA: Cellphone towers could soon have to steer clear of schools and hospitals in Kolkata as the state environment department perceives them as a potential health and safety hazard.”
“A list of guidelines issued by the department has decreed that installation of base station antennas on the premises of schools and hospitals “may be avoided because children and patients are more susceptible to electromagnetic fields.”The order”…..”mentions that antennas be avoided in narrow lanes to reduce the risks caused by an earthquake or wind-related disaster.”…..”the antennas should be at least 3 metre from the nearest building and should not directly face it, and that the lower end of the towers should be at least 3 metres above the ground or roof. Barbed-wire fences should keep antenna sites barred to the public, it has said. And access to towers, the government has suggested, be kept to the minimum, even for maintenance personnel.”
“Cellphone firms have asked to put up warning signs and ensure that these are “clearly visible and identifiable”. A warning sign has been prescribed at the entrance of such zone. Such signs should carry cautionary notes discouraging people — even maintenance personnel — from staying too long in the zone. The environment department has suggested that the sign boards may contain the following text: Danger! RF radiation, Do not enter!“
“Operators and maintenance personnel…should be protected from electromagnetic radiation, the state says. It has advised cellphone firms to educate personnel on the possible hazards from these devices.”
“Cellphone service providers were guarded in their response”….”researchers felt it was still too early to reach a conclusion ….You need to study an entire generation to come to a definite conclusion. But precautions are always welcome”…”There were complaints from several districts. Many schools said mobile towers were being erected on their roofs and in nearby areas….”
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Kolkata_/Cell_towers_moved_out_of_schools/articleshow/3075285.cms
Posted by healthyself in Accelerated Aging, Bioeffects, Biological Activity, Biological Effects, Biologically Signficant, Blogroll, Brain Damage, Brain Stress, Cancer, Cancer Protection, Cell Cultures, Cell phone safety, Cell Phone Transmissions, Cell Phones, Children's health, Cognitive Function, Conversations, Cordless Phones, Cordless Telephone Base Units, Dangerous, Death, earphones, Electromagetic pollution, Electromagnetic Communications, Electromagnetic Field, Electromagnetic Forces, Electromagnetic Interference, Electromagnetic pollution, Electromagnetic Radiation, Electromagnetic Signals, Electromagnetic Spectrum, Electromagnetic waves, Electrophysiology, Electrosensitive, Electrosensitivity, ELF, EMF Exposure, EMF Research, EMF's, Environment, Epidemiology, Exposure, Extra-Sensory Perception, Frequencies, Guidelines, Health, Health related, Health Risk, Health Risks, Health warnings, HOuseholds, HRD, Human Populations, Immune system, Infectious Disease, Interdisciplinary, Legal Issues, Lifestyle, Long Term Health Effects, Long Term Health Risks, Medical Research, Men', Men's Health, Parenting, Pulsed Radiation, radiation, Research, Research Needed, Right Side of the Head, Risk, Risk Factor, Risk of Cancer, Risk of Disease, Safe Levels, Safety Barrier, sensations, Sufficient Evidence, Symptoms, Teenagers, Who is Affected?, Wireless, Wireless Phones, Women's Health.
http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/bestoftv/2008/05/28/lkl.cell.cancer.cnn
Posted by healthyself in Bioeffects, Biological Effects, Biologically Signficant, Blogroll, Cancer, Cancer Protection, Cell Phone Pulses, Cell phone safety, Cell Phone Transmissions, Cell Phones, Childhood Cancer, Children, Children's health, Clear Link, Cordless Phones, Cordless Telephone Base Units, Danger, Dangerous, Death, Death Rates, Diseases, Electromagnetic Radiation, Electrosmog, EMF Exposure, EMF Research, EMF-induced effects, Environment, Exposure, Health related, Health Risk, Health Risks, Health warnings, Heightened Risk, Human Biological Experiment, Investigators, Lifestyle, Long Term Health Effects, Long Term Health Risks, Men's Health, Mobile Phone Transmissions, mobile telephones, Pulsed Radiation, Research, Research Needed, Risk Factor, Risk of Cancer, Risk of Disease, Safe Levels, Safety, Studies, Sufficient Evidence, Unsafe, Wireless, Wireless Microphones, Wireless Phones, Wireless Revolution, Wireless Technologies, Wireless Transmitter, Women's Health, Workplace.
A study by an award-winning cancer expert shows that cell phone use could kill more people than smoking, it is reported.“According to the U.K.’s Independent newspaper, the study”….”shows that there is a growing body of evidence that using handsets for 10 years or more can double the risk of brain cancer.”
“…one of the world’s top neurosurgeons — based his assessment on the fact that three billion people now use the phones worldwide. That is three times higher than people who smoke. Smoking kills some five million globally each year.”
“He warned that people should avoid using handsets whenever possible and called on the phone industry to make them safer. France and Germany have already warned against the use of mobile phones, especially by children, it is reported.”
“The study is said to be the most damning indictment of cell phone use. According to the Independent, cancers take at least 10 years to develop, which has influenced earlier cancer studies showing relative safety when using cell phones.”
http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-wellbeing/health-news/mobile-phones-more-dangerous-than-smoking-or-asbestos-802602.html?r=RSS
Posted by healthyself in Blogroll, Blow Dryers, Electromagnetic Communications, Electromagnetic Forces, Electromagnetic Interference, Electromagnetic pollution, Electromagnetic Radiation, Electromagnetic Signals, Electromagnetic waves, Electrophysiology, Electrosmog, Elevators, ELF, Emergency Medicine, EMF Exposure, EMF Research, EMF's, EMF-induced effects, EMI, Emissions, EMR, Florescent Light Balasts, Health Care, Health Care Facilities, Medical Devices, Noisy Electric Motors, Walkie Talkies, Wireless Technologies.
“The delivery of health care is an inherently mobile activity, with patients moving though the care delivery process and almost all health care workers in constant motion. So it’s no wonder that wireless technologies have been adopted with gusto.”
“Electromagnetic interference (EMI) has been a concern with medical devices since their inception. This EMI can be divided into intentional and unintentional interference. Intentional interference typically comes from radio frequency (RF) radiators like walkie-talkies, wireless phones, WiFi radios, and cell phones that use frequencies and specified power levels that may interfere with the operation of other radios or electronic devices. Unintentional interference is caused by things like paper shredders, bad florescent light ballasts, and noisy electric motors (from blow dryers to elevators). “
“Any electronic device can be affected by EMI, including medical devices. The wireless features of medical devices (or any other wireless device, for that matter) can also be affected. The larger medical device vendors have dedicated engineers and techs who do EMI testing and troubleshoot interference problems at customer sites.”
“In an effort to promote best practices regarding the use of mobile wireless communications and computing technologies in health care facilities, standards committees TC 215 and ISO 35.240.80 have created recommendations for electromagnetic compatibility (management of unintentional electromagnetic interference) with medical devices.”
“Here’s the abstract:
“ISO/TR 21730:2007 provides guidance for the deployment, use and management of mobile wireless communication and computing equipment in healthcare facilities in a way that promotes effective electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) among the wireless technology and active medical devices through mitigation of potential hazards due to electromagnetic interference (EMI). The recommendations given recognize the different resources, needs, concerns and environments of healthcare organizations around the world, and provide detailed management guidelines for healthcare organizations that desire full deployment of mobile wireless communication and computing technology throughout their facilities. In addition, suggestions are included for selective restrictions in cases where healthcare organizations have decided that comprehensive management procedures are not feasible, practical or desirable at the present time. The recommendations herein distinguish between wireless technology controlled by the facility and used by doctors and staff for healthcare-specific communication and health informatics transport versus non-controlled (personal) mobile wireless equipment randomly brought into the facility by visitors, patients or the healthcare organization workforce.”
http://medicalconnectivity.com/2007/04/11.html
Posted by healthyself in 884 MHz, Absorption, ADD, Addiction, ADHD, Adolescents, Alarming, Anger, Anxiety, Attention Deficit, Autism / Asperger's, Behavior problems, Bioeffects, Biological Activity, Biological Effects, Biologically Signficant, Blogroll, Brain, Brain Cancer, Brain Damage, Brain Stress, Brain Tumors, Brainwave Interference, Cell phone industry, Cell phone safety, Cell Phone Transmissions, Cell Phones, Cellular Phone Frequencies, Children's health, Chronic Exhaustion, Chronic Fatigue, Chronic Illness, Clear Link, Cognitive Function, Concentration, Confusion, Conversations, Cordless Phones, Cytotoxic Effects, Danger, Dangerous, Decision Making, Deep Sleep, Delays sleep, Denial of Risk, Depression, Difficulty Concentrating, Dizziness, Electromagnetic Interference, Electromagnetic pollution, Electromagnetic Radiation, Electrophysiology, Electrosensitive, Electrosensitivity, Electrosmog, ELF, EMF Exposure, EMF Research, EMF's, EMF-induced effects, EMR, Encoding, Environment, Epidemiologists, Epidemiology, Evidence, Exposure, Fall Asleep, Fatigue, Forgetfulness, Frequencies, Games and Gaming, Global Health Disaster, Grouchiness, Hand Portables, Handheld Units, Handsets, Hazard, headaches, Health and Safety Officer, Health related, Health Risk, Health Risks, Health warnings, Heightened Risk, Homes, HOuseholds, Human Biological Experiment, Human Populations, Human Resources, Hyperactivity, Hz, immune and nervous funtions, Immune system, Immunity, Impotence, Inner Agitation, Integrity of sleep, Interdisciplinary, Kids, Lack of Concentration, Leakage, Learning, Lifestyle, Long Term Health Effects, Long Term Health Risks, Men's Health, Migraines, Mobile Music, Mobile Phone Transmissions, mobile telephones, Monitoring Authorities, Mood changes, Neural Electrophysiology, Pain Perception, Panic Attacks, Peak Absorption, Penetration, Personality changes, Poor academic performance, Preventive Caution, Prolonged calls, Realistic, Recovery, Repair Damage, Reputable Investigators, Research, Research Needed, Risk Factor, Risk of Cancer, Risk of Disease, Safe Levels, Safety, School administrators, School Boards, Sensitivity, Sick People, Sleep, Sleep Centers, Sleep Disorders, Sleep disturbances, Stress, Suffering, Sufficient Evidence, Symptoms, Toxic Interactions, Tweenies, Wear and Tear, Who is Affected?, WiFi, Wind Down, Wireless, Wireless Phones, Wireless Revolution, Wireless Transmitter, Women's Health.
Phone makers’ own scientists discover that bedtime use can lead to headaches, confusion and depression
“Radiation from mobile phones delays and reduces sleep, and causes headaches and confusion, according to a new study…. “The research, sponsored by the mobile phone companies themselves, shows that using the handsets before bed causes people to take longer to reach the deeper stages of sleep and to spend less time in them, interfering with the body’s ability to repair damage suffered during the day.
“The findings are especially alarming for children and teenagers, most of whom – surveys suggest – use their phones late at night and who especially need sleep. Their failure to get enough can lead to mood and personality changes, ADHD-like symptoms, depression, lack of concentration and poor academic performance.”
“The study – carried out by scientists from the blue-chip Karolinska Institute and Uppsala University in Sweden and from Wayne State University in Michigan, USA – is thought to be the most comprehensive of its kind….” Published by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s Progress in Electromagnetics Research Symposium and funded by the Mobile Manufacturers Forum, representing the main handset companies, it has caused serious concern among top sleep experts, one of whom said that there was now “more than sufficient evidence” to show that the radiation “affects deep sleep.”
“The scientists studied 35 men and 36 women aged between 18 and 45. Some were exposed to radiation that exactly mimicked what is received when using mobile phones; others were placed in precisely the same conditions, but given only “sham” exposure, receiving no radiation at all….The people who had received the radiation took longer to enter the first of the deeper stages of sleep, and spent less time in the deepest one. The scientists concluded: “The study indicates that during laboratory exposure to 884 MHz wireless signals components of sleep believed to be important for recovery from daily wear and tear are adversely affected.”
“The embarrassed [manufacturers] played down the results, insisting – at apparent variance with this published conclusion – that its “results were inconclusive” and that “the researchers did not claim that exposure caused sleep disturbance”….”We did find an effect from mobile phones from exposure scenarios that were realistic. This suggests that they have measurable effects on the brain.”…”the radiation may activate the brain’s stress system, “making people more alert and more focused, and decreasing their ability to wind down and fall asleep”.
“About half of the people studied believed themselves to be “electrosensitive”, reporting symptoms such as headaches and impaired cognitive function from mobile phone use. But they proved to be unable to tell if they had been exposed to the radiation in the test.”…” This strengthens the conclusion of the study, as it disposes of any suggestion that knowledge of exposure influenced sleeping patterns. Even more significantly, it throws into doubt the relevance of studies the industry relies on to maintain that the radiation has no measurable effects.”…”A series of them … have similarly found that people claiming to be electrosensitive could not distinguish when the radiation was turned on in laboratory conditions, suggesting that they were not affected.”…”Critics have attacked the studies’ methodology, but the new findings deal them a serious blow. For they show that the radiation did have an effect, even though people could not tell when they were exposed.”
“It also complements other recent research. A massive study, following 1,656″ … “teenagers for a year, found most of them used their phones after going to bed. It concluded that those who did this once a week were more than three times – and those who used them more often more than five times – as likely to be “very tired”….the director of [a] Sleep Centre, says: “There is now more than sufficient evidence, from a large number of reputable investigators who are finding that mobile phone exposure an hour before sleep adversely affects deep sleep.” [Another director of a] Sleep Institute added: “Anything that disrupts the integrity of your sleep will potentially have adverse consequences in functioning during the day, such as grouchiness, difficulty concentrating, and in children hyperactivity and behaviour problems.”
By Geoffrey Lean, Environment Editor, London, Published: 20 January 2008
http://www.independent.co.uk/IoSblogs