Why Would WHO Do This If There Weren’t a Recognized Problem? (Even if they won’t admit it yet) September 5, 2006
Posted by healthyself in Health related, Environment, Parenting, Men's Health, Teenagers, Cell phone safety, Legal Issues, radiation, EMF's, Immune system, miscarriages, Research, Electromagnetic pollution, mobile telephones, Women's Health, Epidemiologists, Tweenies, Who is Affected?, Electrosensitivity, Children's health, School administrators, Employees, Funding, EMF Research, ELF, Government's role, EMR, genes, Medical Research, HOuseholds, Chromosomal damage, Risk of Disease, Microwave exposure, Emergency Medicine, Grants, Electrosmog, High Frequencies, Risk Factor, 60 Hz Magnetic Fields, Community, University, Safe Levels, Noise, Decision Making, Public Policy, 500 Volts, 12000 volts, Communication, MHz, GHz, 50 Hz, 200 gauss, Workplace, Safety, 900 mHz, 17.6 Hz, Pulsed Radiation, Electromagnetic waves, SAR, 8W/kg, 16 Hz, Long Term Health Risks, Hand Portables, 2.4 GHz, 5 GHz, W/Kg, watts, 1.6 W/kg, 2 W/kg, grams of tissue, Games and Gaming, 100 kHz-94GHz, Animal Research, Death, Military, 10mW, 14 mG, 138 kv, 4 mG, 35 mG, Low Frequencies, 20 Hz, 45, 45 Hz, 85, 5 Hz, 10000 Hz, 20000 Hz, 200000 Hz, Digital, Hz, .2 mHz, .000021 W/Kg, .0021 W/KG, .0004 W/Kg, .001 W/Kg, .0317 W/Kg, .005 W/Kg, .05 W/Kg, .14 W/Kg, .13 W/Kg, .26 W/Kg, .4 W/Kg, .58 W.Kg, .75 W/Kg, .6 W/Kg, 1.2 W/Kg, 2.4 mW/Kg, 3W/Kg, Reaction Time.3 comments
Electromagnetic fields 
“Electromagnetic fields of all frequencies represent one of the most common and fastest growing environmental influences, about which anxiety and speculation are spreading. All populations are now exposed to varying degrees of EMF, and the levels will continue to increase as technology advances.”
“As part of its Charter to protect public health and in response to public concern, the World Health Organization (WHO) established the International EMF Project in 1996 to assess the scientific evidence of possible health effects of EMF in the frequency range from 0 to 300 GHz.”
“The EMF Project is open to broad participation.”
“The EMF Project is open to any WHO Member State government, i.e. department of health, or representatives of other national institutions concerned with radiation protection. The project is fully funded by participating countries and agencies.”
Dangers from Various SAR levels on Cell Phones September 4, 2006
Posted by healthyself in .000021 W/Kg, .0004 W/Kg, .001 W/Kg, .0021 W/KG, .005 W/Kg, .0317 W/Kg, .05 W/Kg, .13 W/Kg, .14 W/Kg, .26 W/Kg, .4 W/Kg, .58 W.Kg, .6 W/Kg, .75 W/Kg, 1.2 W/Kg, 2 W/kg, 2.4 mW/Kg, 3W/Kg, Cell phone safety.3 comments
| SAR | Reported Biological Effects | References |
| 0.000021 – .0021 W/Kg | Changes in cell cycle and cell proliferation (960 MHz GSM cell phone signal) | Kwee, 1997 |
| 0.0004 W/Kg | Pulsed cell phone RF caused changes in blood-brain barrier that protects brain from outside harmful chemicals and toxins (915 MHz GSM cell phone) | Salford, 1997 |
| 0.001 W/Kg | EEG brain waves are altered when exposed to cell phone signal at 0.1 µW/cm2 | Von KIitzing, 1995 |
| 0.0317 W/Kg | Decrease in eating and drinking | Ray & Behari, 1990 |
| .005 to .05 W/Kg | Calcium efflux | Dutta et al, 1989 |
| 0.14 W/Kg | Elevation of immune response at 100 µW/cm2 | Elekes, 1996 |
| 0.13 – 1.4 W/Kg | Lymphoma cancer rate is 2.4 times normal with two 1/2 hour exposures per day of cell phone exposure (pulsed digital mobile phone signal 900 MHz) | Repacholi, 1997 |
| 0.26 W/Kg | Harmful effects to the eyes/ certain drugs can sensitize eyes to RFR | Kues, 1992 |
| 0.4 W/Kg | Statistically significant increase in malignant tumors at 480 µW/cm2 | Guy, 1984 |
| 0.58 – 0.75 W/Kg | Biological effect on the development of brain tumors at 18% of standard (836 MHz TDMA digital cell phone signal) | Adey, 1996 |
| 0.6 and 1.2 W/Kg | DNA single and double strand breaks from RF exposure (2450 MHz) | Lai, 1995 |
| 2.4 mW/Kg to 24 mW/Kg | Digital cell phone (836 TDMA) at very low intensities cause DNA effects in human cells. DNA effects are direct DNA damage and the rate at which DNA is repaired. Is equal to about 800 µW/cm2 power density | Phillips, 1998 |
| 2-3 W/Kg | Cancer acceleration in skin and breast tumors at 50 – 75% of standard | Szmigielski, 1982 |
